拉丁美洲专家小组成员认为,GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 对其所在地区的建议背景非常有用和重要。

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zil H. Nasir , Tamara Lotfi , Juan J. Yepes Nuñez , Yuan Zhang , Ignacio Neumann , Holger J. Schünemann
{"title":"拉丁美洲专家小组成员认为,GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 对其所在地区的建议背景非常有用和重要。","authors":"Zil H. Nasir ,&nbsp;Tamara Lotfi ,&nbsp;Juan J. Yepes Nuñez ,&nbsp;Yuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Ignacio Neumann ,&nbsp;Holger J. Schünemann","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p>Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-ADOLOPMENT is widely applied to efficiently use existing credible guidelines and contextualize them to a target setting. To highlight the experiences of a Latin American Guideline Development Group (GDG) applying GRADE-ADOLOPMENT to adapt the American Society of Hematology's clinical practice guideline on managing venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in Latin America.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><p>We employed a mixed-method postevaluation using self-administered surveys and semistructured interviews. We assessed the Latin American GDG (1) general satisfaction and confidence using the approach, (2) their ratings on the usefulness, appropriateness, and importance of GRADE-ADOLOPMENT and its tools to inform their judgements, and (3) any additional facilitators and barriers to refine the process.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven of the 14 GDG members, including nine panelists and two methodologists, provided survey responses and eight participated in the interview. Respondents felt “mostly” or “completely” satisfied with the adapted guideline. Eight panelists who were surveyed agree that GRADE-ADOLOPMENT is useful in countries with limited resources. Although panelists expressed initial apprehensions in their understanding of the process, they demonstrated enhanced confidence in their capacity to apply GRADE after completing workshop training and by acquiring experience. Panelists reiterated the importance of considering evidence-to-decision (EtD) criteria (ie, resources, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness) when adapting recommendations. The GDG encountered challenges with collecting local and regional data, prioritizing recommendations while considering intraregional diversity, and the lengthy publication period, although the latter stemmed from procedures not related to GRADE-ADOLOPMENT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GRADE-ADOLOPMENT is an important tool to facilitate the adaptation and uptake of clinical practice guidelines in novel settings. The GDG felt satisfied with their overall experience using the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach. However, their experience could have been optimized if they had access to robust regional evidence, more recommendations to adapt from, and worked with more efficient guideline production timelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 111483"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latin American panelists find GRADE-ADOLOPMENT useful and important to contextualize recommendations in their region\",\"authors\":\"Zil H. Nasir ,&nbsp;Tamara Lotfi ,&nbsp;Juan J. Yepes Nuñez ,&nbsp;Yuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Ignacio Neumann ,&nbsp;Holger J. Schünemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p>Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-ADOLOPMENT is widely applied to efficiently use existing credible guidelines and contextualize them to a target setting. To highlight the experiences of a Latin American Guideline Development Group (GDG) applying GRADE-ADOLOPMENT to adapt the American Society of Hematology's clinical practice guideline on managing venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in Latin America.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><p>We employed a mixed-method postevaluation using self-administered surveys and semistructured interviews. We assessed the Latin American GDG (1) general satisfaction and confidence using the approach, (2) their ratings on the usefulness, appropriateness, and importance of GRADE-ADOLOPMENT and its tools to inform their judgements, and (3) any additional facilitators and barriers to refine the process.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven of the 14 GDG members, including nine panelists and two methodologists, provided survey responses and eight participated in the interview. Respondents felt “mostly” or “completely” satisfied with the adapted guideline. Eight panelists who were surveyed agree that GRADE-ADOLOPMENT is useful in countries with limited resources. Although panelists expressed initial apprehensions in their understanding of the process, they demonstrated enhanced confidence in their capacity to apply GRADE after completing workshop training and by acquiring experience. Panelists reiterated the importance of considering evidence-to-decision (EtD) criteria (ie, resources, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness) when adapting recommendations. The GDG encountered challenges with collecting local and regional data, prioritizing recommendations while considering intraregional diversity, and the lengthy publication period, although the latter stemmed from procedures not related to GRADE-ADOLOPMENT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GRADE-ADOLOPMENT is an important tool to facilitate the adaptation and uptake of clinical practice guidelines in novel settings. The GDG felt satisfied with their overall experience using the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach. However, their experience could have been optimized if they had access to robust regional evidence, more recommendations to adapt from, and worked with more efficient guideline production timelines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624002397\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624002397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:GRADE-ADOLOPMENT被广泛应用于有效利用现有的可靠指南,并将其与目标环境相结合:重点介绍拉丁美洲指南制定小组应用 GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 对美国血液学会关于拉丁美洲静脉血栓栓塞症管理的临床实践指南进行调整的经验:我们采用了自填式调查和半结构式访谈的混合方法进行后期评估。我们评估了拉丁美洲指南制定小组(GDG)(1)使用该方法的总体满意度和信心(2)他们对 GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 及其工具的有用性、适当性和重要性的评价,以便为他们的判断提供信息,以及(3)完善该过程的其他促进因素和障碍:14 名 GDG 成员中有 11 人(包括 9 名专家组成员和 2 名方法论专家)提供了调查回复,8 人参加了访谈。受访者对调整后的指南感到 "基本 "或 "完全 "满意。接受调查的八位专家组成员同意 GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 对资源有限的国家有用。尽管专家组成员最初对这一过程的理解表示担忧,但在完成讲习班培训并积累经验后,他们对自己应用 GRADE 的能力表现出了更强的信心。专家组成员重申了在调整建议时考虑证据决定标准(即资源、可行性和成本效益)的重要性。GDG 在收集当地和地区数据、在考虑地区内多样性的同时确定建议的优先次序以及漫长的出版周期方面遇到了挑战,尽管后者是由与 GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 无关的程序引起的:结论:GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 是促进临床实践指南在新环境中适应和采纳的重要工具。专家组对使用 GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 方法的总体体验感到满意。不过,如果他们能获得可靠的地区证据、更多可供改编的建议,并与更高效的指南编制时间表合作,他们的经验本可以得到优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Latin American panelists find GRADE-ADOLOPMENT useful and important to contextualize recommendations in their region

Background and Objective

Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-ADOLOPMENT is widely applied to efficiently use existing credible guidelines and contextualize them to a target setting. To highlight the experiences of a Latin American Guideline Development Group (GDG) applying GRADE-ADOLOPMENT to adapt the American Society of Hematology's clinical practice guideline on managing venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in Latin America.

Study Design and Setting

We employed a mixed-method postevaluation using self-administered surveys and semistructured interviews. We assessed the Latin American GDG (1) general satisfaction and confidence using the approach, (2) their ratings on the usefulness, appropriateness, and importance of GRADE-ADOLOPMENT and its tools to inform their judgements, and (3) any additional facilitators and barriers to refine the process.

Results

Eleven of the 14 GDG members, including nine panelists and two methodologists, provided survey responses and eight participated in the interview. Respondents felt “mostly” or “completely” satisfied with the adapted guideline. Eight panelists who were surveyed agree that GRADE-ADOLOPMENT is useful in countries with limited resources. Although panelists expressed initial apprehensions in their understanding of the process, they demonstrated enhanced confidence in their capacity to apply GRADE after completing workshop training and by acquiring experience. Panelists reiterated the importance of considering evidence-to-decision (EtD) criteria (ie, resources, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness) when adapting recommendations. The GDG encountered challenges with collecting local and regional data, prioritizing recommendations while considering intraregional diversity, and the lengthy publication period, although the latter stemmed from procedures not related to GRADE-ADOLOPMENT.

Conclusions

GRADE-ADOLOPMENT is an important tool to facilitate the adaptation and uptake of clinical practice guidelines in novel settings. The GDG felt satisfied with their overall experience using the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach. However, their experience could have been optimized if they had access to robust regional evidence, more recommendations to adapt from, and worked with more efficient guideline production timelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信