通过定量 PCR 检测唾液中的结核分枝杆菌复合体:肺结核诊断的潜在替代样本。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Sosina Ayalew , Teklu Wegayehu , Binium Wondale , Dawit Kebede , Mahlet Osman , Sebsib Niway , Azeb Tarekegn , Bamlak Tessema , Stefan Berg , Roland T. Ashford , Adane Mihret
{"title":"通过定量 PCR 检测唾液中的结核分枝杆菌复合体:肺结核诊断的潜在替代样本。","authors":"Sosina Ayalew ,&nbsp;Teklu Wegayehu ,&nbsp;Binium Wondale ,&nbsp;Dawit Kebede ,&nbsp;Mahlet Osman ,&nbsp;Sebsib Niway ,&nbsp;Azeb Tarekegn ,&nbsp;Bamlak Tessema ,&nbsp;Stefan Berg ,&nbsp;Roland T. Ashford ,&nbsp;Adane Mihret","doi":"10.1016/j.tube.2024.102554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic tests primarily rely on sputum samples, yet many TB patients cannot produce sputum. This study explored whether saliva could be used instead of sputum to diagnose pulmonary TB (PTB).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study included 32 patients with confirmed PTB and 30 patients with other respiratory diseases (ORD). Saliva from all study participants was subjected to quantitative (qPCR) assays targeting the IS<em>1081</em> gene for detection of <em>M. tuberculosis complex</em> DNA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity of saliva IS<em>1081</em> qPCR was 65.6 % (95 % CI 48.4–80.2 %) with positive results for 21/32 PTB cases, while the specificity was 96.7 % (95 % CI 85.9–99.6 %) with negative results for 29/30 participants with ORD. Sensitivity improved to 72.4 % (95 % CI 54.6–86.0 %) when sputum-Xpert was used as the reference standard, while remaining similar at 65.5 % (95 % CI 47.4–80.7 %) when culture was used as the reference standard. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for saliva IS<em>1081</em> qPCR was 82.5 % (95 % CI 71.7–93.3 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Saliva testing offers a promising alternative to sputum for TB diagnosis among confirmed PTB cases. Larger multicenter studies, encompassing diverse clinical TB characteristics, are needed to provide improved estimates of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23383,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 102554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in saliva by quantitative PCR: A potential alternative specimen for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Sosina Ayalew ,&nbsp;Teklu Wegayehu ,&nbsp;Binium Wondale ,&nbsp;Dawit Kebede ,&nbsp;Mahlet Osman ,&nbsp;Sebsib Niway ,&nbsp;Azeb Tarekegn ,&nbsp;Bamlak Tessema ,&nbsp;Stefan Berg ,&nbsp;Roland T. Ashford ,&nbsp;Adane Mihret\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tube.2024.102554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic tests primarily rely on sputum samples, yet many TB patients cannot produce sputum. This study explored whether saliva could be used instead of sputum to diagnose pulmonary TB (PTB).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study included 32 patients with confirmed PTB and 30 patients with other respiratory diseases (ORD). Saliva from all study participants was subjected to quantitative (qPCR) assays targeting the IS<em>1081</em> gene for detection of <em>M. tuberculosis complex</em> DNA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity of saliva IS<em>1081</em> qPCR was 65.6 % (95 % CI 48.4–80.2 %) with positive results for 21/32 PTB cases, while the specificity was 96.7 % (95 % CI 85.9–99.6 %) with negative results for 29/30 participants with ORD. Sensitivity improved to 72.4 % (95 % CI 54.6–86.0 %) when sputum-Xpert was used as the reference standard, while remaining similar at 65.5 % (95 % CI 47.4–80.7 %) when culture was used as the reference standard. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for saliva IS<em>1081</em> qPCR was 82.5 % (95 % CI 71.7–93.3 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Saliva testing offers a promising alternative to sputum for TB diagnosis among confirmed PTB cases. Larger multicenter studies, encompassing diverse clinical TB characteristics, are needed to provide improved estimates of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberculosis\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberculosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472979224000805\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472979224000805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的肺结核(TB)诊断测试主要依赖痰液样本,但许多肺结核患者无法提供痰液。本研究探讨了是否可以用唾液代替痰来诊断肺结核(PTB):研究对象包括 32 名确诊为肺结核的患者和 30 名患有其他呼吸道疾病(ORD)的患者。对所有参与者的唾液进行针对 IS1081 基因的定量(qPCR)检测,以检测结核杆菌复合体 DNA:结果:唾液 IS1081 qPCR 的灵敏度为 65.6 %(95 % CI 48.4-80.2%),21/32 例 PTB 患者的检测结果为阳性;特异性为 96.7 %(95 % CI 85.9-99.6%),29/30 例 ORD 患者的检测结果为阴性。以痰-Xpert作为参考标准时,灵敏度提高到72.4%(95 % CI 54.6-86.0%),而以培养作为参考标准时,灵敏度则保持在65.5%(95 % CI 47.4-80.7%)。在接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析中,唾液 IS1081 qPCR 的曲线下面积(AUC)为 82.5 %(95 % CI 71.7-93.3%):结论:在确诊的肺结核病例中,唾液检测是替代痰液进行肺结核诊断的一种很有前途的方法。需要进行更大规模的多中心研究,涵盖不同的结核病临床特征,以提供更好的诊断灵敏度和特异性估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in saliva by quantitative PCR: A potential alternative specimen for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis

Background

Current tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic tests primarily rely on sputum samples, yet many TB patients cannot produce sputum. This study explored whether saliva could be used instead of sputum to diagnose pulmonary TB (PTB).

Method

The study included 32 patients with confirmed PTB and 30 patients with other respiratory diseases (ORD). Saliva from all study participants was subjected to quantitative (qPCR) assays targeting the IS1081 gene for detection of M. tuberculosis complex DNA.

Results

The sensitivity of saliva IS1081 qPCR was 65.6 % (95 % CI 48.4–80.2 %) with positive results for 21/32 PTB cases, while the specificity was 96.7 % (95 % CI 85.9–99.6 %) with negative results for 29/30 participants with ORD. Sensitivity improved to 72.4 % (95 % CI 54.6–86.0 %) when sputum-Xpert was used as the reference standard, while remaining similar at 65.5 % (95 % CI 47.4–80.7 %) when culture was used as the reference standard. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for saliva IS1081 qPCR was 82.5 % (95 % CI 71.7–93.3 %).

Conclusion

Saliva testing offers a promising alternative to sputum for TB diagnosis among confirmed PTB cases. Larger multicenter studies, encompassing diverse clinical TB characteristics, are needed to provide improved estimates of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Tuberculosis is a speciality journal focusing on basic experimental research on tuberculosis, notably on bacteriological, immunological and pathogenesis aspects of the disease. The journal publishes original research and reviews on the host response and immunology of tuberculosis and the molecular biology, genetics and physiology of the organism, however discourages submissions with a meta-analytical focus (for example, articles based on searches of published articles in public electronic databases, especially where there is lack of evidence of the personal involvement of authors in the generation of such material). We do not publish Clinical Case-Studies. Areas on which submissions are welcomed include: -Clinical TrialsDiagnostics- Antimicrobial resistance- Immunology- Leprosy- Microbiology, including microbial physiology- Molecular epidemiology- Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria- Pathogenesis- Pathology- Vaccine development. This Journal does not accept case-reports. The resurgence of interest in tuberculosis has accelerated the pace of relevant research and Tuberculosis has grown with it, as the only journal dedicated to experimental biomedical research in tuberculosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信