Cresandra E Corbin, Anna Sliwowska, Jeffrey P Levine, Samantha Stimmel, Jennifer R Amico
{"title":"全科医疗机构早期人工流产后的避孕措施:回顾病历","authors":"Cresandra E Corbin, Anna Sliwowska, Jeffrey P Levine, Samantha Stimmel, Jennifer R Amico","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early abortion increasingly is provided in the primary care setting, allowing improved access, continuity of care, and contraception, if desired. We aimed in this retrospective chart review to describe postabortion contraception provision in a family medicine office.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were those patients who obtained an induced abortion during an 11-year period at a family medicine office. We documented contraception provision within 30 days of abortion and used simple proportions, Fisher exact tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests to describe differences in contraceptive provision by type of abortion and continuity status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the patients who underwent abortions (254/353, 72%) had documentation of a contraceptive method within 30 days of abortion, which was similar for patients who had either a medication (124/166, 75%) or an aspiration abortion (130/187, 70%, <i>P</i> = 0.71). The most common contraceptives were contraceptive pills (104/353, 29%) or intrauterine devices (68/353, 19%). Patients who chose a tier 1 method were more likely to have a procedure abortion (50/87, 57%), whereas patients who chose a tier 2 method were likely to have a medication abortion (83/160, 52%). Fewer than half (45%, 158/353, <i>P</i> = 0.0002) were continuity patients and established patients in the primary care office. Most tier 1 contraceptive users were continuity patients (49/87, 60%), whereas most patients without a contraceptive method were noncontinuity patients (72/99, 73%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary care setting is uniquely equipped for providing early abortion and postabortion contraception. Although the providers offered all contraceptive options to eligible patients, continuity patients were more likely to receive more effective contraception in their primary care office.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 8","pages":"498-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contraception Initiation after Early Abortion in a Family Medicine Setting: A Retrospective Chart Review.\",\"authors\":\"Cresandra E Corbin, Anna Sliwowska, Jeffrey P Levine, Samantha Stimmel, Jennifer R Amico\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early abortion increasingly is provided in the primary care setting, allowing improved access, continuity of care, and contraception, if desired. We aimed in this retrospective chart review to describe postabortion contraception provision in a family medicine office.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were those patients who obtained an induced abortion during an 11-year period at a family medicine office. We documented contraception provision within 30 days of abortion and used simple proportions, Fisher exact tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests to describe differences in contraceptive provision by type of abortion and continuity status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the patients who underwent abortions (254/353, 72%) had documentation of a contraceptive method within 30 days of abortion, which was similar for patients who had either a medication (124/166, 75%) or an aspiration abortion (130/187, 70%, <i>P</i> = 0.71). The most common contraceptives were contraceptive pills (104/353, 29%) or intrauterine devices (68/353, 19%). Patients who chose a tier 1 method were more likely to have a procedure abortion (50/87, 57%), whereas patients who chose a tier 2 method were likely to have a medication abortion (83/160, 52%). Fewer than half (45%, 158/353, <i>P</i> = 0.0002) were continuity patients and established patients in the primary care office. Most tier 1 contraceptive users were continuity patients (49/87, 60%), whereas most patients without a contraceptive method were noncontinuity patients (72/99, 73%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary care setting is uniquely equipped for providing early abortion and postabortion contraception. Although the providers offered all contraceptive options to eligible patients, continuity patients were more likely to receive more effective contraception in their primary care office.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 8\",\"pages\":\"498-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001718\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contraception Initiation after Early Abortion in a Family Medicine Setting: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Objectives: Early abortion increasingly is provided in the primary care setting, allowing improved access, continuity of care, and contraception, if desired. We aimed in this retrospective chart review to describe postabortion contraception provision in a family medicine office.
Methods: Participants were those patients who obtained an induced abortion during an 11-year period at a family medicine office. We documented contraception provision within 30 days of abortion and used simple proportions, Fisher exact tests, and χ2 tests to describe differences in contraceptive provision by type of abortion and continuity status.
Results: Most of the patients who underwent abortions (254/353, 72%) had documentation of a contraceptive method within 30 days of abortion, which was similar for patients who had either a medication (124/166, 75%) or an aspiration abortion (130/187, 70%, P = 0.71). The most common contraceptives were contraceptive pills (104/353, 29%) or intrauterine devices (68/353, 19%). Patients who chose a tier 1 method were more likely to have a procedure abortion (50/87, 57%), whereas patients who chose a tier 2 method were likely to have a medication abortion (83/160, 52%). Fewer than half (45%, 158/353, P = 0.0002) were continuity patients and established patients in the primary care office. Most tier 1 contraceptive users were continuity patients (49/87, 60%), whereas most patients without a contraceptive method were noncontinuity patients (72/99, 73%).
Conclusions: The primary care setting is uniquely equipped for providing early abortion and postabortion contraception. Although the providers offered all contraceptive options to eligible patients, continuity patients were more likely to receive more effective contraception in their primary care office.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.