Jahnvee Solanki, Tiwini Hemi, Amy Chen, Sarah Welch, Rachael Niederer
{"title":"新西兰提供的糖尿病视网膜病变治疗:是否存在种族差异?","authors":"Jahnvee Solanki, Tiwini Hemi, Amy Chen, Sarah Welch, Rachael Niederer","doi":"10.26635/6965.6282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Ethnic disparities have been observed in treatment at first specialist appointments across various specialties within New Zealand. This study aimed to examine documentation and treatment decisions for diabetic retinopathy by ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective audit of first specialist diabetic retinopathy clinic appointments for 388 patients at the Department of Ophthalmology, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland. Multiple domains of care were assessed, including comprehensiveness of history taking, examination, investigations and treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Europeans comprised 42%, Māori only 9.5%, Pacific peoples 13.19%, Asian 32.7% and Middle Eastern/Latin American/African in 2%. Māori patients were eligible for a significantly greater number of treatments (p=0.001). The comprehensiveness of history taking (p=0.809), examination (p=0.513), investigations (p=0.623) and proportion of eligible treatments provided (p=0.788) was similar but did not reach the gold standard of care across all ethnicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The standard of care provided in first specialist appointments for diabetic retinopathy appear to be similar across all ethnic groups, although Māori were underrepresented and had a higher disease burden at presentation. Our data highlights the need to reduce barriers faced by Māori in accessing GP, optometry and retinopathy screening referrals in Auckland, and improving local consultation and treatment guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1600","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provision of care for diabetic retinopathy in New Zealand: are there ethnic disparities?\",\"authors\":\"Jahnvee Solanki, Tiwini Hemi, Amy Chen, Sarah Welch, Rachael Niederer\",\"doi\":\"10.26635/6965.6282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Ethnic disparities have been observed in treatment at first specialist appointments across various specialties within New Zealand. This study aimed to examine documentation and treatment decisions for diabetic retinopathy by ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective audit of first specialist diabetic retinopathy clinic appointments for 388 patients at the Department of Ophthalmology, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland. Multiple domains of care were assessed, including comprehensiveness of history taking, examination, investigations and treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Europeans comprised 42%, Māori only 9.5%, Pacific peoples 13.19%, Asian 32.7% and Middle Eastern/Latin American/African in 2%. Māori patients were eligible for a significantly greater number of treatments (p=0.001). The comprehensiveness of history taking (p=0.809), examination (p=0.513), investigations (p=0.623) and proportion of eligible treatments provided (p=0.788) was similar but did not reach the gold standard of care across all ethnicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The standard of care provided in first specialist appointments for diabetic retinopathy appear to be similar across all ethnic groups, although Māori were underrepresented and had a higher disease burden at presentation. Our data highlights the need to reduce barriers faced by Māori in accessing GP, optometry and retinopathy screening referrals in Auckland, and improving local consultation and treatment guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"137 1600\",\"pages\":\"12-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在新西兰各专科的首次专科就诊治疗中发现了种族差异。本研究旨在按种族检查糖尿病视网膜病变的记录和治疗决定:方法:对奥克兰Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai眼科部388名患者的首次糖尿病视网膜病变专科门诊预约进行回顾性审计。对多个护理领域进行了评估,包括病史采集、检查、检验和治疗决定的全面性:结果:欧洲人占 42%,毛利人仅占 9.5%,太平洋岛屿族裔占 13.19%,亚洲人占 32.7%,中东/拉丁美洲/非洲人占 2%。毛利患者接受治疗的次数明显较多(P=0.001)。所有种族的病史采集(p=0.809)、检查(p=0.513)、检验(p=0.623)和合格治疗比例(p=0.788)的全面性相似,但未达到黄金护理标准:结论:尽管毛利人在糖尿病视网膜病变首次专科就诊中的比例较低,且就诊时的疾病负担较重,但各族裔群体在首次专科就诊中提供的护理标准似乎相似。我们的数据突出表明,有必要减少奥克兰毛利人在获得全科医生、验光师和视网膜病变筛查转诊方面所面临的障碍,并改进当地的咨询和治疗指南。
Provision of care for diabetic retinopathy in New Zealand: are there ethnic disparities?
Aims: Ethnic disparities have been observed in treatment at first specialist appointments across various specialties within New Zealand. This study aimed to examine documentation and treatment decisions for diabetic retinopathy by ethnicity.
Methods: Retrospective audit of first specialist diabetic retinopathy clinic appointments for 388 patients at the Department of Ophthalmology, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland. Multiple domains of care were assessed, including comprehensiveness of history taking, examination, investigations and treatment decisions.
Results: Europeans comprised 42%, Māori only 9.5%, Pacific peoples 13.19%, Asian 32.7% and Middle Eastern/Latin American/African in 2%. Māori patients were eligible for a significantly greater number of treatments (p=0.001). The comprehensiveness of history taking (p=0.809), examination (p=0.513), investigations (p=0.623) and proportion of eligible treatments provided (p=0.788) was similar but did not reach the gold standard of care across all ethnicities.
Conclusions: The standard of care provided in first specialist appointments for diabetic retinopathy appear to be similar across all ethnic groups, although Māori were underrepresented and had a higher disease burden at presentation. Our data highlights the need to reduce barriers faced by Māori in accessing GP, optometry and retinopathy screening referrals in Auckland, and improving local consultation and treatment guidelines.