Krishna K Eachempati, Apurve Parameswaran, Vinay K Ponnala, Apsingi Sunil, Neil P Sheth
{"title":"在机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中,\"扩展 \"受限运动学排列可减少骨关节炎外翻膝关节的残余内侧间隙紧缩。","authors":"Krishna K Eachempati, Apurve Parameswaran, Vinay K Ponnala, Apsingi Sunil, Neil P Sheth","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0054.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this study were: 1) to describe extended restricted kinematic alignment (E-rKA), a novel alignment strategy during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA); 2) to compare residual medial compartment tightness following virtual surgical planning during RA-TKA using mechanical alignment (MA) and E-rKA, in the same set of osteoarthritic varus knees; 3) to assess the requirement of soft-tissue releases during RA-TKA using E-rKA; and 4) to compare the accuracy of surgical plan execution between knees managed with adjustments in component positioning alone, and those which require additional soft-tissue releases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RA-TKA between January and December 2022 for primary varus osteoarthritis were included. Safe boundaries for E-rKA were defined. Residual medial compartment tightness was compared following virtual surgical planning using E-rKA and MA, in the same set of knees. Soft-tissue releases were documented. Errors in postoperative alignment in relation to planned alignment were compared between patients who did (group A) and did not (group B) require soft-tissue releases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of E-rKA helped restore all knees within the predefined boundaries, with appropriate soft-tissue balancing. E-rKA compared with MA resulted in reduced residual medial tightness following surgical planning, in full extension (2.71 mm (SD 1.66) vs 5.16 mm (SD 3.10), respectively; p < 0.001), and 90° of flexion (2.52 mm (SD 1.63) vs 6.27 mm (SD 3.11), respectively; p < 0.001). Among the study population, 156 patients (78%) were managed with minor adjustments in component positioning alone, while 44 (22%) required additional soft-tissue releases. The mean errors in postoperative alignment were 0.53 mm and 0.26 mm among patients in group A and group B, respectively (p = 0.328).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>E-rKA is an effective and reproducible alignment strategy during RA-TKA, permitting a large proportion of patients to be managed without soft-tissue releases. The execution of minor alterations in component positioning within predefined multiplanar boundaries is a better starting point for gap management than soft-tissue releases.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 8","pages":"628-636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Extended' restricted kinematic alignment results in decreased residual medial gap tightness among osteoarthritic varus knees during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Krishna K Eachempati, Apurve Parameswaran, Vinay K Ponnala, Apsingi Sunil, Neil P Sheth\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0054.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this study were: 1) to describe extended restricted kinematic alignment (E-rKA), a novel alignment strategy during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA); 2) to compare residual medial compartment tightness following virtual surgical planning during RA-TKA using mechanical alignment (MA) and E-rKA, in the same set of osteoarthritic varus knees; 3) to assess the requirement of soft-tissue releases during RA-TKA using E-rKA; and 4) to compare the accuracy of surgical plan execution between knees managed with adjustments in component positioning alone, and those which require additional soft-tissue releases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RA-TKA between January and December 2022 for primary varus osteoarthritis were included. Safe boundaries for E-rKA were defined. Residual medial compartment tightness was compared following virtual surgical planning using E-rKA and MA, in the same set of knees. Soft-tissue releases were documented. Errors in postoperative alignment in relation to planned alignment were compared between patients who did (group A) and did not (group B) require soft-tissue releases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of E-rKA helped restore all knees within the predefined boundaries, with appropriate soft-tissue balancing. E-rKA compared with MA resulted in reduced residual medial tightness following surgical planning, in full extension (2.71 mm (SD 1.66) vs 5.16 mm (SD 3.10), respectively; p < 0.001), and 90° of flexion (2.52 mm (SD 1.63) vs 6.27 mm (SD 3.11), respectively; p < 0.001). Among the study population, 156 patients (78%) were managed with minor adjustments in component positioning alone, while 44 (22%) required additional soft-tissue releases. The mean errors in postoperative alignment were 0.53 mm and 0.26 mm among patients in group A and group B, respectively (p = 0.328).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>E-rKA is an effective and reproducible alignment strategy during RA-TKA, permitting a large proportion of patients to be managed without soft-tissue releases. The execution of minor alterations in component positioning within predefined multiplanar boundaries is a better starting point for gap management than soft-tissue releases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 8\",\"pages\":\"628-636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0054.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0054.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是1)描述机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RA-TKA)中的一种新型对位策略--扩展受限运动学对位(E-rKA);2)在同一组骨性关节炎外翻膝关节中,比较 RA-TKA 期间使用机械对位(MA)和 E-rKA 进行虚拟手术规划后的残余内侧室紧绷情况;3)评估使用 E-rKA 进行 RA-TKA 期间软组织松解的要求;以及 4)比较仅通过调整组件定位管理的膝关节与需要额外软组织松解的膝关节之间手术计划执行的准确性。方法:纳入2022年1月至12月期间因原发性变位骨关节炎接受RA-TKA手术的患者。定义E-rKA的安全边界。在同一组膝关节中,使用E-rKA和MA进行虚拟手术规划后,比较残留的内侧间室紧缩度。记录软组织松解情况。比较了需要(A 组)和不需要(B 组)软组织松解的患者术后对位与计划对位的误差:结果:使用 E-rKA 有助于将所有膝关节恢复到预定边界内,并进行适当的软组织平衡。与 MA 相比,E-rKA 可减少手术规划后残留的内侧紧绷感,在完全伸展(分别为 2.71 mm (SD 1.66) vs 5.16 mm (SD 3.10);P < 0.001)和屈曲 90°(分别为 2.52 mm (SD 1.63) vs 6.27 mm (SD 3.11);P < 0.001)时均是如此。在研究人群中,156 名患者(78%)只需对组件定位进行微调即可,而 44 名患者(22%)则需要额外的软组织松解。A 组和 B 组患者术后对位的平均误差分别为 0.53 毫米和 0.26 毫米(P = 0.328):E-rKA是RA-TKA手术中一种有效且可重复的对位策略,使大部分患者无需进行软组织松解即可完成手术。与软组织松解相比,在预定义的多平面边界内对组件定位进行微小改动是间隙管理的更好起点。
'Extended' restricted kinematic alignment results in decreased residual medial gap tightness among osteoarthritic varus knees during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Aims: The aims of this study were: 1) to describe extended restricted kinematic alignment (E-rKA), a novel alignment strategy during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA); 2) to compare residual medial compartment tightness following virtual surgical planning during RA-TKA using mechanical alignment (MA) and E-rKA, in the same set of osteoarthritic varus knees; 3) to assess the requirement of soft-tissue releases during RA-TKA using E-rKA; and 4) to compare the accuracy of surgical plan execution between knees managed with adjustments in component positioning alone, and those which require additional soft-tissue releases.
Methods: Patients who underwent RA-TKA between January and December 2022 for primary varus osteoarthritis were included. Safe boundaries for E-rKA were defined. Residual medial compartment tightness was compared following virtual surgical planning using E-rKA and MA, in the same set of knees. Soft-tissue releases were documented. Errors in postoperative alignment in relation to planned alignment were compared between patients who did (group A) and did not (group B) require soft-tissue releases.
Results: The use of E-rKA helped restore all knees within the predefined boundaries, with appropriate soft-tissue balancing. E-rKA compared with MA resulted in reduced residual medial tightness following surgical planning, in full extension (2.71 mm (SD 1.66) vs 5.16 mm (SD 3.10), respectively; p < 0.001), and 90° of flexion (2.52 mm (SD 1.63) vs 6.27 mm (SD 3.11), respectively; p < 0.001). Among the study population, 156 patients (78%) were managed with minor adjustments in component positioning alone, while 44 (22%) required additional soft-tissue releases. The mean errors in postoperative alignment were 0.53 mm and 0.26 mm among patients in group A and group B, respectively (p = 0.328).
Conclusion: E-rKA is an effective and reproducible alignment strategy during RA-TKA, permitting a large proportion of patients to be managed without soft-tissue releases. The execution of minor alterations in component positioning within predefined multiplanar boundaries is a better starting point for gap management than soft-tissue releases.