与上胸椎融合术相比,胸腰椎融合术治疗成人腰椎畸形显示出更优越的 QALY 收益和更低的成本。

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00919-7
Andrew H Kim, Richard A Hostin, Samrat Yeramaneni, Jeffrey L Gum, Pratibha Nayak, Breton G Line, Shay Bess, Peter G Passias, D Kojo Hamilton, Munish C Gupta, Justin S Smith, Renaud Lafage, Bassel G Diebo, Virginie Lafage, Eric O Klineberg, Alan H Daniels, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Frank J Schwab, Christopher I Shaffrey, Christopher P Ames, Douglas C Burton, Khaled M Kebaish
{"title":"与上胸椎融合术相比,胸腰椎融合术治疗成人腰椎畸形显示出更优越的 QALY 收益和更低的成本。","authors":"Andrew H Kim, Richard A Hostin, Samrat Yeramaneni, Jeffrey L Gum, Pratibha Nayak, Breton G Line, Shay Bess, Peter G Passias, D Kojo Hamilton, Munish C Gupta, Justin S Smith, Renaud Lafage, Bassel G Diebo, Virginie Lafage, Eric O Klineberg, Alan H Daniels, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Frank J Schwab, Christopher I Shaffrey, Christopher P Ames, Douglas C Burton, Khaled M Kebaish","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00919-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with sagittal plane deformity (N) or structural lumbar/thoraco-lumbar (TL) curves can be treated with fusions stopping at the TL junction or extending to the upper thoracic (UT) spine. This study evaluates the impact on cost/cumulative quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in patients treated with TL vs UT fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ASD patients with > 4-level fusion and 2-year follow-up were included. Index and total episode-of-care costs were estimated using average itemized direct costs obtained from hospital records. Cumulative QALY gained were calculated from preoperative to 2-year postoperative change in Short Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) scores. The TL and UT groups comprised patients with upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) at T9-T12 and T2-T5, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 566 patients with type N or L curves, mean age was 63.2 ± 12.1 years, 72% were female and 93% Caucasians. Patients in the TL group had better sagittal vertical axis (7.3 ± 6.9 vs. 9.2 ± 8.1 cm, p = 0.01), lower surgical invasiveness (- 30; p < 0.001), and shorter OR time (- 35 min; p = 0.01). Index and total costs were 20% lower in the TL than in the UT group (p < 0.001). Cost/QALY was 65% lower (492,174.6 vs. 963,391.4), and 2-year QALY gain was 40% higher, in the TL than UT group (0.15 vs. 0.10; p = 0.02). Multivariate model showed TL fusions had lower total cost (p = 0.001) and higher QALY gain (p = 0.03) than UT fusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Schwab type N or L curves, TL fusions showed lower 2-year cost and improved QALY gain without increased reoperation rates or length of stay than UT fusions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":"1783-1791"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracolumbar fusions for adult lumbar deformity show superior QALY gain and lower costs compared with upper thoracic fusions.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew H Kim, Richard A Hostin, Samrat Yeramaneni, Jeffrey L Gum, Pratibha Nayak, Breton G Line, Shay Bess, Peter G Passias, D Kojo Hamilton, Munish C Gupta, Justin S Smith, Renaud Lafage, Bassel G Diebo, Virginie Lafage, Eric O Klineberg, Alan H Daniels, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Frank J Schwab, Christopher I Shaffrey, Christopher P Ames, Douglas C Burton, Khaled M Kebaish\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-024-00919-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with sagittal plane deformity (N) or structural lumbar/thoraco-lumbar (TL) curves can be treated with fusions stopping at the TL junction or extending to the upper thoracic (UT) spine. This study evaluates the impact on cost/cumulative quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in patients treated with TL vs UT fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ASD patients with > 4-level fusion and 2-year follow-up were included. Index and total episode-of-care costs were estimated using average itemized direct costs obtained from hospital records. Cumulative QALY gained were calculated from preoperative to 2-year postoperative change in Short Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) scores. The TL and UT groups comprised patients with upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) at T9-T12 and T2-T5, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 566 patients with type N or L curves, mean age was 63.2 ± 12.1 years, 72% were female and 93% Caucasians. Patients in the TL group had better sagittal vertical axis (7.3 ± 6.9 vs. 9.2 ± 8.1 cm, p = 0.01), lower surgical invasiveness (- 30; p < 0.001), and shorter OR time (- 35 min; p = 0.01). Index and total costs were 20% lower in the TL than in the UT group (p < 0.001). Cost/QALY was 65% lower (492,174.6 vs. 963,391.4), and 2-year QALY gain was 40% higher, in the TL than UT group (0.15 vs. 0.10; p = 0.02). Multivariate model showed TL fusions had lower total cost (p = 0.001) and higher QALY gain (p = 0.03) than UT fusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Schwab type N or L curves, TL fusions showed lower 2-year cost and improved QALY gain without increased reoperation rates or length of stay than UT fusions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1783-1791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00919-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00919-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:矢状面畸形(N)或结构性腰椎/胸椎-腰椎(TL)弯曲的成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者可采用止于TL交界处或延伸至胸椎上部(UT)的融合术进行治疗。本研究评估了TL与UT融合术对患者成本/累积质量调整生命年(QALY)的影响:方法:研究对象包括接受过 4 级以上融合术且随访 2 年的 ASD 患者。使用从医院记录中获得的平均逐项直接费用估算指数成本和总医疗费用。根据术前至术后2年的简表六维(SF-6D)评分变化计算累计QALY收益。TL组和UT组分别包括T9-T12和T2-T5椎体上部装有器械(UIV)的患者:在566名N型或L型曲线患者中,平均年龄为(63.2 ± 12.1)岁,72%为女性,93%为白种人。TL组患者的矢状纵轴更好(7.3 ± 6.9 vs. 9.2 ± 8.1 cm,P = 0.01),手术侵袭性更低(- 30;P 结论:TL组患者的矢状纵轴更好(7.3 ± 6.9 vs. 9.2 ± 8.1 cm,P = 0.01),手术侵袭性更低(- 30;P = 0.01):与UT融合术相比,在Schwab N型或L型曲线中,TL融合术的2年费用更低,QALY收益更高,但不增加再手术率或住院时间:证据等级:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoracolumbar fusions for adult lumbar deformity show superior QALY gain and lower costs compared with upper thoracic fusions.

Purpose: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with sagittal plane deformity (N) or structural lumbar/thoraco-lumbar (TL) curves can be treated with fusions stopping at the TL junction or extending to the upper thoracic (UT) spine. This study evaluates the impact on cost/cumulative quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in patients treated with TL vs UT fusion.

Methods: ASD patients with > 4-level fusion and 2-year follow-up were included. Index and total episode-of-care costs were estimated using average itemized direct costs obtained from hospital records. Cumulative QALY gained were calculated from preoperative to 2-year postoperative change in Short Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) scores. The TL and UT groups comprised patients with upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) at T9-T12 and T2-T5, respectively.

Results: Of 566 patients with type N or L curves, mean age was 63.2 ± 12.1 years, 72% were female and 93% Caucasians. Patients in the TL group had better sagittal vertical axis (7.3 ± 6.9 vs. 9.2 ± 8.1 cm, p = 0.01), lower surgical invasiveness (- 30; p < 0.001), and shorter OR time (- 35 min; p = 0.01). Index and total costs were 20% lower in the TL than in the UT group (p < 0.001). Cost/QALY was 65% lower (492,174.6 vs. 963,391.4), and 2-year QALY gain was 40% higher, in the TL than UT group (0.15 vs. 0.10; p = 0.02). Multivariate model showed TL fusions had lower total cost (p = 0.001) and higher QALY gain (p = 0.03) than UT fusions.

Conclusion: In Schwab type N or L curves, TL fusions showed lower 2-year cost and improved QALY gain without increased reoperation rates or length of stay than UT fusions.

Level of evidence: III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信