肩胛骨位置测试的可靠性以及患有和未患有青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的患者的肩胛骨位置和肩部功能的比较。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Tae-Gyu Kim, Young-Hoon Kim, Rui Ma, Soo-Yong Kim
{"title":"肩胛骨位置测试的可靠性以及患有和未患有青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的患者的肩胛骨位置和肩部功能的比较。","authors":"Tae-Gyu Kim, Young-Hoon Kim, Rui Ma, Soo-Yong Kim","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An evaluation of scapula position is important to predict spine curvature and shoulder function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Therefore, a reliable scapula position is required to assess posture in patients with AIS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the reliabilities of scapula position tests and differences in scapula position and shoulder function between individuals with and without AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study compared 18 patients with AIS and 18 healthy controls to identify differences in scapula position and shoulder function. The acromion-table distance, lateral displacement of the scapula, acromion depression, winged scapula, upward rotation of the scapula, and anterior tilt of the scapula were measured. Scapula position test reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Shoulder function was measured using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliabilities of scapula position tests (ICC 0.85-0.93, SEM 0.1-1.2, and MCID 0.2-2.5) were good. There were significant differences in scapula position and shoulder function between patients with AIS and healthy controls (p< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scapula position tests were highly reliable in patients with AIS; they can be used to evaluate scapula position during clinical assessment of posture in patients with AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scapula position test reliability and comparisons of scapula position and shoulder function among individuals with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Tae-Gyu Kim, Young-Hoon Kim, Rui Ma, Soo-Yong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BMR-230357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An evaluation of scapula position is important to predict spine curvature and shoulder function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Therefore, a reliable scapula position is required to assess posture in patients with AIS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the reliabilities of scapula position tests and differences in scapula position and shoulder function between individuals with and without AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study compared 18 patients with AIS and 18 healthy controls to identify differences in scapula position and shoulder function. The acromion-table distance, lateral displacement of the scapula, acromion depression, winged scapula, upward rotation of the scapula, and anterior tilt of the scapula were measured. Scapula position test reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Shoulder function was measured using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliabilities of scapula position tests (ICC 0.85-0.93, SEM 0.1-1.2, and MCID 0.2-2.5) were good. There were significant differences in scapula position and shoulder function between patients with AIS and healthy controls (p< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scapula position tests were highly reliable in patients with AIS; they can be used to evaluate scapula position during clinical assessment of posture in patients with AIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩胛骨位置的评估对于预测青少年特发性脊柱侧弯症(AIS)患者的脊柱弯曲和肩部功能非常重要。因此,需要可靠的肩胛骨位置来评估 AIS 患者的姿势:本研究调查了肩胛骨位置测试的可靠性,以及AIS患者和非AIS患者在肩胛骨位置和肩关节功能方面的差异:该研究比较了 18 名 AIS 患者和 18 名健康对照者,以确定肩胛骨位置和肩关节功能的差异。研究测量了肩峰-肩台距离、肩胛骨外侧移位、肩峰凹陷、肩胛骨翼状、肩胛骨上旋和肩胛骨前倾。使用类内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)和最小临床重要差异(MCID)评估肩胛骨位置测试的可靠性。肩关节功能采用肩关节疼痛和残疾指数进行测量:肩胛骨位置测试的可靠性(ICC 0.85-0.93、SEM 0.1-1.2、MCID 0.2-2.5)良好。AIS患者与健康对照组在肩胛骨位置和肩关节功能方面存在明显差异(P< 0.05):肩胛骨位置测试在AIS患者中非常可靠,可用于在临床评估AIS患者姿势时评估肩胛骨位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scapula position test reliability and comparisons of scapula position and shoulder function among individuals with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Background: An evaluation of scapula position is important to predict spine curvature and shoulder function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Therefore, a reliable scapula position is required to assess posture in patients with AIS.

Objective: This study investigated the reliabilities of scapula position tests and differences in scapula position and shoulder function between individuals with and without AIS.

Methods: The study compared 18 patients with AIS and 18 healthy controls to identify differences in scapula position and shoulder function. The acromion-table distance, lateral displacement of the scapula, acromion depression, winged scapula, upward rotation of the scapula, and anterior tilt of the scapula were measured. Scapula position test reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Shoulder function was measured using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.

Results: The reliabilities of scapula position tests (ICC 0.85-0.93, SEM 0.1-1.2, and MCID 0.2-2.5) were good. There were significant differences in scapula position and shoulder function between patients with AIS and healthy controls (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Scapula position tests were highly reliable in patients with AIS; they can be used to evaluate scapula position during clinical assessment of posture in patients with AIS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信