肱骨骨关节炎的成像:放射学分类的可靠性和再现性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Umile Giuseppe Longo, Alessandro de Sire, Sergio De Salvatore, Giuliano Zollo, Vincenzo Di Matteo, Alessandra Corradini, Alice Ceccaroli, Valerio Ammendolia, Giovanni Calabrese, Pieter D'Hooghe
{"title":"肱骨骨关节炎的成像:放射学分类的可靠性和再现性。","authors":"Umile Giuseppe Longo, Alessandro de Sire, Sergio De Salvatore, Giuliano Zollo, Vincenzo Di Matteo, Alessandra Corradini, Alice Ceccaroli, Valerio Ammendolia, Giovanni Calabrese, Pieter D'Hooghe","doi":"10.3233/BMR-240187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glenohumeral degenerative joint disease may affect up to 20% of the population. There are several classification systems of this disease in the scientific literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and reproducibility of glenohumeral osteoarthritis classification systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed glenohumeral plain radiographs performed in a University Hospital. These radiographs were graded into nine radiological classification systems by two observers on two evaluations. Patients who have performed CT/MRI scan were staged according to the Walch classification. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the classification schemes were determined by using Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 752 patients were included in the study (52.4% females and 47.6% males), mean aged 66.2 ± 16.3 years. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities were 0.543 (observer 1), 0.630 (observer 2), and 0.760 (inter-observer) for the Weinstein grading system; 0.661, 0.706, and 0.761 for the Guyette grading system; 0.575, 0.679 and 0.704 for the Kellgren and Lawrence classification; 0.817, 0.816 e 0.871 for the Samilson and Prieto classification; 0.791, 0.811 and 0.847 for the Allain modification; 0.797, 0.842 and 0.860 for the Gerber modification; 0.773, 0.827 and 0.828 for the Buscayret modification; 0.584, 0.648 and 0.755 for the Hawkins and Angelo classification; 0.661, 0.749 and 0.764 for the Rosenberg classification. Intra-observer reliability for MRI was 0.757 (observer 1) and 0.675 (observer 2), while intra-observer reliability for CT was 0.811 (observer 1) and 0.653 (observer 2). Inter-observer reliabilities were 0.790 for MRI and 0.673 for CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The classification systems according to Weinstein, Guyette, Hawkins and Angelo, Rosenberg and the modifications of the Samilson and Prieto classification according to Allain, Gerber and Buscayret showed a comparable reliability with the commonly used glenohumeral osteoarthritis grading systems, Samilson and Prieto and Kellgren and Lawrence. Thus, they are recommended for clinical and especially scientific purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: Reliability and reproducibility of radiological classifications.\",\"authors\":\"Umile Giuseppe Longo, Alessandro de Sire, Sergio De Salvatore, Giuliano Zollo, Vincenzo Di Matteo, Alessandra Corradini, Alice Ceccaroli, Valerio Ammendolia, Giovanni Calabrese, Pieter D'Hooghe\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BMR-240187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glenohumeral degenerative joint disease may affect up to 20% of the population. There are several classification systems of this disease in the scientific literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and reproducibility of glenohumeral osteoarthritis classification systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed glenohumeral plain radiographs performed in a University Hospital. These radiographs were graded into nine radiological classification systems by two observers on two evaluations. Patients who have performed CT/MRI scan were staged according to the Walch classification. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the classification schemes were determined by using Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 752 patients were included in the study (52.4% females and 47.6% males), mean aged 66.2 ± 16.3 years. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities were 0.543 (observer 1), 0.630 (observer 2), and 0.760 (inter-observer) for the Weinstein grading system; 0.661, 0.706, and 0.761 for the Guyette grading system; 0.575, 0.679 and 0.704 for the Kellgren and Lawrence classification; 0.817, 0.816 e 0.871 for the Samilson and Prieto classification; 0.791, 0.811 and 0.847 for the Allain modification; 0.797, 0.842 and 0.860 for the Gerber modification; 0.773, 0.827 and 0.828 for the Buscayret modification; 0.584, 0.648 and 0.755 for the Hawkins and Angelo classification; 0.661, 0.749 and 0.764 for the Rosenberg classification. Intra-observer reliability for MRI was 0.757 (observer 1) and 0.675 (observer 2), while intra-observer reliability for CT was 0.811 (observer 1) and 0.653 (observer 2). Inter-observer reliabilities were 0.790 for MRI and 0.673 for CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The classification systems according to Weinstein, Guyette, Hawkins and Angelo, Rosenberg and the modifications of the Samilson and Prieto classification according to Allain, Gerber and Buscayret showed a comparable reliability with the commonly used glenohumeral osteoarthritis grading systems, Samilson and Prieto and Kellgren and Lawrence. Thus, they are recommended for clinical and especially scientific purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-240187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-240187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:盂肱关节退行性病变可能影响多达20%的人口。科学文献中有几种关于这种疾病的分类系统:本研究旨在确定盂肱骨关节炎分类系统的可靠性和可重复性:方法:我们对一家大学医院拍摄的盂肱关节平片进行了评估。方法:我们对一家大学医院拍摄的盂肱骨平片进行了评估,由两名观察者在两次评估中将这些平片分为九个放射学分类系统。进行过CT/MRI扫描的患者则根据Walch分类法进行分期。采用科恩加权卡帕系数确定了分级方案在观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性:研究共纳入 752 名患者(女性占 52.4%,男性占 47.6%),平均年龄为 66.2 ± 16.3 岁。韦恩斯坦分级系统的观察者内和观察者间信度分别为 0.543(观察者 1)、0.630(观察者 2)和 0.760(观察者间);盖特分级系统的信度分别为 0.661、0.706 和 0.761;凯尔格伦和劳伦斯分级系统的信度分别为 0.575、0.679 和 0.704;萨米尔森和普里佩尔分级系统的信度分别为 0.817、0.816 e 0.871。Samilson和Prieto分类法的可靠性分别为0.817、0.816和0.871;Allain修正法的可靠性分别为0.791、0.811和0.847;Gerber修正法的可靠性分别为0.797、0.842和0.860;Buscayret修正法的可靠性分别为0.773、0.827和0.828;Hawkins和Angelo分类法的可靠性分别为0.584、0.648和0.755;Rosenberg分类法的可靠性分别为0.661、0.749和0.764。核磁共振成像的观察者内部信度为 0.757(观察者 1)和 0.675(观察者 2),而 CT 的观察者内部信度为 0.811(观察者 1)和 0.653(观察者 2)。核磁共振成像的观察者间可靠性为 0.790,CT 为 0.673:Weinstein、Guyette、Hawkins 和 Angelo、Rosenberg 的分类系统以及 Allain、Gerber 和 Buscayret 对 Samilson 和 Prieto 分类系统的修改显示出与常用的盂肱骨关节炎分级系统 Samilson 和 Prieto 以及 Kellgren 和 Lawrence 的可靠性相当。因此,建议将它们用于临床,特别是科研目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imaging of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: Reliability and reproducibility of radiological classifications.

Background: Glenohumeral degenerative joint disease may affect up to 20% of the population. There are several classification systems of this disease in the scientific literature.

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and reproducibility of glenohumeral osteoarthritis classification systems.

Methods: We assessed glenohumeral plain radiographs performed in a University Hospital. These radiographs were graded into nine radiological classification systems by two observers on two evaluations. Patients who have performed CT/MRI scan were staged according to the Walch classification. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the classification schemes were determined by using Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient.

Results: A total of 752 patients were included in the study (52.4% females and 47.6% males), mean aged 66.2 ± 16.3 years. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities were 0.543 (observer 1), 0.630 (observer 2), and 0.760 (inter-observer) for the Weinstein grading system; 0.661, 0.706, and 0.761 for the Guyette grading system; 0.575, 0.679 and 0.704 for the Kellgren and Lawrence classification; 0.817, 0.816 e 0.871 for the Samilson and Prieto classification; 0.791, 0.811 and 0.847 for the Allain modification; 0.797, 0.842 and 0.860 for the Gerber modification; 0.773, 0.827 and 0.828 for the Buscayret modification; 0.584, 0.648 and 0.755 for the Hawkins and Angelo classification; 0.661, 0.749 and 0.764 for the Rosenberg classification. Intra-observer reliability for MRI was 0.757 (observer 1) and 0.675 (observer 2), while intra-observer reliability for CT was 0.811 (observer 1) and 0.653 (observer 2). Inter-observer reliabilities were 0.790 for MRI and 0.673 for CT.

Conclusion: The classification systems according to Weinstein, Guyette, Hawkins and Angelo, Rosenberg and the modifications of the Samilson and Prieto classification according to Allain, Gerber and Buscayret showed a comparable reliability with the commonly used glenohumeral osteoarthritis grading systems, Samilson and Prieto and Kellgren and Lawrence. Thus, they are recommended for clinical and especially scientific purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信