改变心智的处方药安全吗?氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮的教训。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2380773
Richard C Dart
{"title":"改变心智的处方药安全吗?氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮的教训。","authors":"Richard C Dart","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2380773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent decades have witnessed an extraordinary global crisis of drug misuse. Although opioid analgesics receive the most attention, numerous other drugs have increased rates of misuse.</p><p><strong>Ketamine and esketamine: </strong>Ketamine and esketamine offer a unique natural experiment to explore two medications that are similar pharmacologically but differ in their availability to users and in their regulation by government agencies.</p><p><strong>Misuse and abuse of ketamine and esketamine: </strong>Multisystem \"mosaic\" surveillance of many drugs using real-world data has emerged in recent years. Ketamine and esketamine have been monitored concurrently. Ketamine is much more widely available than esketamine and shows clear signs of increasing misuse and abuse. In contrast, esketamine is difficult to detect in postmarket surveillance even though availability is increasing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ketamine and esketamine offer insights regarding the safety of prescription medications with the potential for misuse. Since the pharmacology of ketamine and esketamine are similar, the regulatory apparatus may be the primary difference that limits misuse. Ketamine has few restrictions and can be prescribed or administered by many healthcare providers, and is available as an illicit drug. In contrast, the product labeling for esketamine has rigorous restrictions on its use. Many important issues remain to be addressed. We need a more rigorous evaluation of the natural experiment of ketamine and esketamine. How does this experience relate to the introduction of new psychedelics?</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ketamine misuse use and misuse are increasing while esketamine use in increasing, but misuse is not increasing. It is reasonable to reevaluate the regulatory controls on ketamine to reduce its misuse and abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"477-482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can mind-altering prescription medicines be safe? Lessons from ketamine and esketamine.\",\"authors\":\"Richard C Dart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15563650.2024.2380773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent decades have witnessed an extraordinary global crisis of drug misuse. Although opioid analgesics receive the most attention, numerous other drugs have increased rates of misuse.</p><p><strong>Ketamine and esketamine: </strong>Ketamine and esketamine offer a unique natural experiment to explore two medications that are similar pharmacologically but differ in their availability to users and in their regulation by government agencies.</p><p><strong>Misuse and abuse of ketamine and esketamine: </strong>Multisystem \\\"mosaic\\\" surveillance of many drugs using real-world data has emerged in recent years. Ketamine and esketamine have been monitored concurrently. Ketamine is much more widely available than esketamine and shows clear signs of increasing misuse and abuse. In contrast, esketamine is difficult to detect in postmarket surveillance even though availability is increasing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ketamine and esketamine offer insights regarding the safety of prescription medications with the potential for misuse. Since the pharmacology of ketamine and esketamine are similar, the regulatory apparatus may be the primary difference that limits misuse. Ketamine has few restrictions and can be prescribed or administered by many healthcare providers, and is available as an illicit drug. In contrast, the product labeling for esketamine has rigorous restrictions on its use. Many important issues remain to be addressed. We need a more rigorous evaluation of the natural experiment of ketamine and esketamine. How does this experience relate to the introduction of new psychedelics?</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ketamine misuse use and misuse are increasing while esketamine use in increasing, but misuse is not increasing. It is reasonable to reevaluate the regulatory controls on ketamine to reduce its misuse and abuse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"477-482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2380773\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2380773","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:近几十年来,全球药物滥用危机异常严重。尽管阿片类镇痛药最受关注,但其他许多药物的滥用率也在上升:氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮提供了一个独特的自然实验来探讨两种药理上相似,但在对使用者的供应和政府机构的监管方面却不同的药物:近年来出现了利用真实世界数据对许多药物进行多系统 "镶嵌式 "监测的做法。氯胺酮和埃斯氯胺酮同时受到监测。氯胺酮比艾司氯胺酮更容易获得,而且有明显的误用和滥用迹象。相比之下,尽管氯胺酮的供应量在不断增加,但在上市后监测中却很难发现埃斯氯胺酮:讨论:氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮提供了有关处方药安全性的见解,但也存在滥用的可能性。由于氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮的药理相似,监管机构可能是限制滥用的主要区别。氯胺酮的限制很少,许多医疗机构都可以开处方或给药,也可以作为非法药物出售。相比之下,艾司氯胺酮的产品标签对其使用有严格限制。许多重要问题仍有待解决。我们需要对氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮的自然实验进行更严格的评估。这一经验与新迷幻药的引入有何关系?氯胺酮的滥用和误用正在增加,而艾司氯胺酮的使用在增加,但误用却没有增加。重新评估对氯胺酮的监管控制以减少其误用和滥用是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can mind-altering prescription medicines be safe? Lessons from ketamine and esketamine.

Introduction: Recent decades have witnessed an extraordinary global crisis of drug misuse. Although opioid analgesics receive the most attention, numerous other drugs have increased rates of misuse.

Ketamine and esketamine: Ketamine and esketamine offer a unique natural experiment to explore two medications that are similar pharmacologically but differ in their availability to users and in their regulation by government agencies.

Misuse and abuse of ketamine and esketamine: Multisystem "mosaic" surveillance of many drugs using real-world data has emerged in recent years. Ketamine and esketamine have been monitored concurrently. Ketamine is much more widely available than esketamine and shows clear signs of increasing misuse and abuse. In contrast, esketamine is difficult to detect in postmarket surveillance even though availability is increasing.

Discussion: Ketamine and esketamine offer insights regarding the safety of prescription medications with the potential for misuse. Since the pharmacology of ketamine and esketamine are similar, the regulatory apparatus may be the primary difference that limits misuse. Ketamine has few restrictions and can be prescribed or administered by many healthcare providers, and is available as an illicit drug. In contrast, the product labeling for esketamine has rigorous restrictions on its use. Many important issues remain to be addressed. We need a more rigorous evaluation of the natural experiment of ketamine and esketamine. How does this experience relate to the introduction of new psychedelics?

Conclusions: Ketamine misuse use and misuse are increasing while esketamine use in increasing, but misuse is not increasing. It is reasonable to reevaluate the regulatory controls on ketamine to reduce its misuse and abuse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信