开发临床风险评分,对急诊科就诊患者的严重眩晕病因进行风险分层。

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Annals of emergency medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.003
Robert Ohle, David W Savage, Danielle Roy, Sarah McIsaac, Ravinder Singh, Daniel Lelli, Darren Tse, Peter Johns, Krishan Yadav, Jeffrey J Perry
{"title":"开发临床风险评分,对急诊科就诊患者的严重眩晕病因进行风险分层。","authors":"Robert Ohle, David W Savage, Danielle Roy, Sarah McIsaac, Ravinder Singh, Daniel Lelli, Darren Tse, Peter Johns, Krishan Yadav, Jeffrey J Perry","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Identify high-risk clinical characteristics for a serious cause of vertigo in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicentre prospective cohort study over 3 years at three university-affiliated tertiary care EDs. Participants were patients presenting with vertigo, dizziness or imbalance. Main outcome measurement was an adjudicated serious diagnosis defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, vertebral artery dissection or brain tumour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,078 of 2,618 potentially eligible patients (79.4%) were enrolled (mean age 77.1 years; 59% women). Serious events occurred in 111 (5.3%) patients. We used logistic regression to create a 7-item prediction model: male, age over 65, hypertension, diabetes, motor/sensory deficits, cerebellar signs/symptoms and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo diagnosis (C-statistic 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 0.98). The risk of a serious diagnosis ranged from 0% for a score of <5, 2.1% for a score of 5 to 8, and 41% for a score >8. Sensitivity for a serious diagnosis was 100% (95% CI, 97.1% to 100%) and specificity 72.1% (95% CI, 70.1% to 74%) for a score <5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score identifies the risk of a serious diagnosis as a cause of a patient's vertigo and if validated could assist physicians in guiding further investigation, consultation, and treatment decisions, improving resource utilization and reducing missed diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":"122-131"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Clinical Risk Score to Risk Stratify for a Serious Cause of Vertigo in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Ohle, David W Savage, Danielle Roy, Sarah McIsaac, Ravinder Singh, Daniel Lelli, Darren Tse, Peter Johns, Krishan Yadav, Jeffrey J Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Identify high-risk clinical characteristics for a serious cause of vertigo in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicentre prospective cohort study over 3 years at three university-affiliated tertiary care EDs. Participants were patients presenting with vertigo, dizziness or imbalance. Main outcome measurement was an adjudicated serious diagnosis defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, vertebral artery dissection or brain tumour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,078 of 2,618 potentially eligible patients (79.4%) were enrolled (mean age 77.1 years; 59% women). Serious events occurred in 111 (5.3%) patients. We used logistic regression to create a 7-item prediction model: male, age over 65, hypertension, diabetes, motor/sensory deficits, cerebellar signs/symptoms and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo diagnosis (C-statistic 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 0.98). The risk of a serious diagnosis ranged from 0% for a score of <5, 2.1% for a score of 5 to 8, and 41% for a score >8. Sensitivity for a serious diagnosis was 100% (95% CI, 97.1% to 100%) and specificity 72.1% (95% CI, 70.1% to 74%) for a score <5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score identifies the risk of a serious diagnosis as a cause of a patient's vertigo and if validated could assist physicians in guiding further investigation, consultation, and treatment decisions, improving resource utilization and reducing missed diagnoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"122-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的确定急诊科(ED)就诊患者严重眩晕病因的高危临床特征:多中心前瞻性队列研究:在三所大学附属三级医疗机构的急诊科进行,为期三年。参与者为出现眩晕、头晕或失衡的患者。主要结果测量指标是经裁定的严重诊断,即中风、短暂性脑缺血发作、椎动脉夹层或脑肿瘤:在 2618 名可能符合条件的患者中,共有 2078 人(79.4%)入选(平均年龄 77.1 岁;59% 为女性)。111名患者(5.3%)发生了严重事件。我们使用逻辑回归建立了一个 7 项预测模型:男性、65 岁以上、高血压、糖尿病、运动/感觉障碍、小脑体征/症状和良性阵发性位置性眩晕诊断(C 统计量为 0.96,95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 0.92 至 0.98)。对严重诊断的敏感性为 100%(95% CI,97.1% 至 100%),特异性为 72.1%(95% CI,70.1% 至 74%):萨德伯里眩晕症风险评分可确定导致患者眩晕的严重诊断风险,如果得到验证,可帮助医生指导进一步的调查、咨询和治疗决策,提高资源利用率并减少漏诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Clinical Risk Score to Risk Stratify for a Serious Cause of Vertigo in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Study objective: Identify high-risk clinical characteristics for a serious cause of vertigo in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).

Methods: Multicentre prospective cohort study over 3 years at three university-affiliated tertiary care EDs. Participants were patients presenting with vertigo, dizziness or imbalance. Main outcome measurement was an adjudicated serious diagnosis defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, vertebral artery dissection or brain tumour.

Results: A total of 2,078 of 2,618 potentially eligible patients (79.4%) were enrolled (mean age 77.1 years; 59% women). Serious events occurred in 111 (5.3%) patients. We used logistic regression to create a 7-item prediction model: male, age over 65, hypertension, diabetes, motor/sensory deficits, cerebellar signs/symptoms and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo diagnosis (C-statistic 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 0.98). The risk of a serious diagnosis ranged from 0% for a score of <5, 2.1% for a score of 5 to 8, and 41% for a score >8. Sensitivity for a serious diagnosis was 100% (95% CI, 97.1% to 100%) and specificity 72.1% (95% CI, 70.1% to 74%) for a score <5.

Conclusion: The Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score identifies the risk of a serious diagnosis as a cause of a patient's vertigo and if validated could assist physicians in guiding further investigation, consultation, and treatment decisions, improving resource utilization and reducing missed diagnoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信