{"title":"提高安瓿开启安全性:创新安瓿开启器的探索性比较研究","authors":"Zu-Chun Lin, Ming-Chuan Kuo, Hao-Wen Chang, Malcolm Koo","doi":"10.1007/s12247-024-09856-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Ampoules are widely used in medical settings worldwide. However, there is a lack of research comparing the safety and efficiency of various ampoule-opening methods. This exploratory study aimed to compare several parameters regarding the safety and efficiency of an innovative ampoule opener with two other methods for opening ampoules.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six participants were recruited from a university and a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. They were instructed to open ampoules of three different capacities (2 mL, 5 mL, and 20 mL) in duplicates using three distinct methods: by hand, with scissors, and with an innovative ampoule opener. This led to a total of 18 ampoules being opened per participant.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Analysis with Generalized Estimating Equations revealed significant risks associated with using scissors, especially for larger ampoules, resulting in more spikes, indentations, and glass shards. Moreover, opening a 2 mL ampoule with scissors took significantly longer than doing so by hand. Conversely, the correct use of ampoule openers was found to result in fewer spikes and glass shards.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This exploratory study showed the importance of using ampoule openers and providing adequate training in their use to improve safety for healthcare workers and patients. Our findings also serve as a preliminary guide for future research to help in developing comprehensive safe-opening guidelines and inform best practices in healthcare settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Ampoule Opening Safety: An Exploratory Comparative Study on an Innovative Ampoule Opener\",\"authors\":\"Zu-Chun Lin, Ming-Chuan Kuo, Hao-Wen Chang, Malcolm Koo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12247-024-09856-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Ampoules are widely used in medical settings worldwide. However, there is a lack of research comparing the safety and efficiency of various ampoule-opening methods. This exploratory study aimed to compare several parameters regarding the safety and efficiency of an innovative ampoule opener with two other methods for opening ampoules.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six participants were recruited from a university and a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. They were instructed to open ampoules of three different capacities (2 mL, 5 mL, and 20 mL) in duplicates using three distinct methods: by hand, with scissors, and with an innovative ampoule opener. This led to a total of 18 ampoules being opened per participant.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Analysis with Generalized Estimating Equations revealed significant risks associated with using scissors, especially for larger ampoules, resulting in more spikes, indentations, and glass shards. Moreover, opening a 2 mL ampoule with scissors took significantly longer than doing so by hand. Conversely, the correct use of ampoule openers was found to result in fewer spikes and glass shards.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This exploratory study showed the importance of using ampoule openers and providing adequate training in their use to improve safety for healthcare workers and patients. Our findings also serve as a preliminary guide for future research to help in developing comprehensive safe-opening guidelines and inform best practices in healthcare settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-024-09856-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-024-09856-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 安瓿在世界各地的医疗机构中广泛使用。然而,目前缺乏对各种安瓿开启方法的安全性和效率进行比较的研究。本探索性研究旨在比较创新型安瓿开启器与其他两种安瓿开启方法在安全性和效率方面的几个参数。指导他们使用三种不同的方法重复打开三种不同容量(2 mL、5 mL 和 20 mL)的安瓿:用手、剪刀和创新安瓿开启器。结果 使用广义估计方程分析发现,使用剪刀有很大风险,特别是对于较大的安瓿,会造成更多的尖刺、压痕和玻璃碎片。此外,用剪刀打开 2 毫升安瓿所需的时间明显长于用手打开。结论这项探索性研究表明,使用安瓿开口器并提供适当的使用培训对提高医护人员和患者的安全性非常重要。我们的研究结果也为今后的研究提供了初步指导,有助于制定全面的安全开瓶指南,并为医疗机构的最佳实践提供参考。
Improving Ampoule Opening Safety: An Exploratory Comparative Study on an Innovative Ampoule Opener
Purpose
Ampoules are widely used in medical settings worldwide. However, there is a lack of research comparing the safety and efficiency of various ampoule-opening methods. This exploratory study aimed to compare several parameters regarding the safety and efficiency of an innovative ampoule opener with two other methods for opening ampoules.
Methods
Six participants were recruited from a university and a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. They were instructed to open ampoules of three different capacities (2 mL, 5 mL, and 20 mL) in duplicates using three distinct methods: by hand, with scissors, and with an innovative ampoule opener. This led to a total of 18 ampoules being opened per participant.
Results
Analysis with Generalized Estimating Equations revealed significant risks associated with using scissors, especially for larger ampoules, resulting in more spikes, indentations, and glass shards. Moreover, opening a 2 mL ampoule with scissors took significantly longer than doing so by hand. Conversely, the correct use of ampoule openers was found to result in fewer spikes and glass shards.
Conclusion
This exploratory study showed the importance of using ampoule openers and providing adequate training in their use to improve safety for healthcare workers and patients. Our findings also serve as a preliminary guide for future research to help in developing comprehensive safe-opening guidelines and inform best practices in healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories:
Materials science,
Product design,
Process design, optimization, automation and control,
Facilities; Information management,
Regulatory policy and strategy,
Supply chain developments ,
Education and professional development,
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.