{"title":"稳健的重置网络","authors":"Naveen Durvasula, Tim Roughgarden","doi":"arxiv-2407.21785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the risks of validator reuse across multiple services in a restaking\nprotocol. We characterize the robust security of a restaking network as a\nfunction of the buffer between the costs and profits from attacks. For example,\nour results imply that if attack costs always exceed attack profits by 10\\%,\nthen a sudden loss of .1\\% of the overall stake (e.g., due to a software error)\ncannot result in the ultimate loss of more than 1.1\\% of the overall stake. We\nalso provide local analogs of these overcollateralization conditions and robust\nsecurity guarantees that apply specifically for a target service or coalition\nof services. All of our bounds on worst-case stake loss are the best possible.\nFinally, we bound the maximum-possible length of a cascade of attacks. Our results suggest measures of robustness that could be exposed to the\nparticipants in a restaking protocol. We also suggest polynomial-time\ncomputable sufficient conditions that can proxy for these measures.","PeriodicalId":501525,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms","volume":"168 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust Restaking Networks\",\"authors\":\"Naveen Durvasula, Tim Roughgarden\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.21785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the risks of validator reuse across multiple services in a restaking\\nprotocol. We characterize the robust security of a restaking network as a\\nfunction of the buffer between the costs and profits from attacks. For example,\\nour results imply that if attack costs always exceed attack profits by 10\\\\%,\\nthen a sudden loss of .1\\\\% of the overall stake (e.g., due to a software error)\\ncannot result in the ultimate loss of more than 1.1\\\\% of the overall stake. We\\nalso provide local analogs of these overcollateralization conditions and robust\\nsecurity guarantees that apply specifically for a target service or coalition\\nof services. All of our bounds on worst-case stake loss are the best possible.\\nFinally, we bound the maximum-possible length of a cascade of attacks. Our results suggest measures of robustness that could be exposed to the\\nparticipants in a restaking protocol. We also suggest polynomial-time\\ncomputable sufficient conditions that can proxy for these measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms\",\"volume\":\"168 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.21785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.21785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We study the risks of validator reuse across multiple services in a restaking
protocol. We characterize the robust security of a restaking network as a
function of the buffer between the costs and profits from attacks. For example,
our results imply that if attack costs always exceed attack profits by 10\%,
then a sudden loss of .1\% of the overall stake (e.g., due to a software error)
cannot result in the ultimate loss of more than 1.1\% of the overall stake. We
also provide local analogs of these overcollateralization conditions and robust
security guarantees that apply specifically for a target service or coalition
of services. All of our bounds on worst-case stake loss are the best possible.
Finally, we bound the maximum-possible length of a cascade of attacks. Our results suggest measures of robustness that could be exposed to the
participants in a restaking protocol. We also suggest polynomial-time
computable sufficient conditions that can proxy for these measures.