监督程序下的欧盟国家（《欧盟条约》第 7.1 条）为何不应担任理事会主席国

IF 1.4 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1111/eulj.12510

Emilio De Capitani, Virgilio Dastoli

{"title":"监督程序下的欧盟国家（《欧盟条约》第 7.1 条）为何不应担任理事会主席国","authors":"Emilio De Capitani, Virgilio Dastoli","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mutual trust that is the bedrock of intra-EU cooperation should not be equated to ‘blind trust’ when a Member State is under the ‘surveillance’ procedure foreseen by Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union. In this perspective it would be risky for the European Council to recognise a key coordinating role, as is the case when holding the Council Presidency, to a Member State under Article 7.1 TUE. It would then be sensible for the Council to modify its 2016 Decision, and delay the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union to such a time when the Article 7(1) TEU surveillance procedure will have been successfully concluded.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 3","pages":"256-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why an EU country under the surveillance procedure (Article 7.1 TEU) should not chair the Council Presidency\",\"authors\":\"Emilio De Capitani, Virgilio Dastoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eulj.12510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mutual trust that is the bedrock of intra-EU cooperation should not be equated to ‘blind trust’ when a Member State is under the ‘surveillance’ procedure foreseen by Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union. In this perspective it would be risky for the European Council to recognise a key coordinating role, as is the case when holding the Council Presidency, to a Member State under Article 7.1 TUE. It would then be sensible for the Council to modify its 2016 Decision, and delay the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union to such a time when the Article 7(1) TEU surveillance procedure will have been successfully concluded.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"256-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12510\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

互信是欧盟内部合作的基石，当一个成员国处于《欧盟条约》第 7(1)条规定的 "监督 "程序之下时，互信不应等同于 "盲目信任"。从这一角度看，欧洲理事会承认一个成员国在《欧盟条约》第 7.1 条下的关键协调作用（如担任理事会主席国时）是有风险的。因此，欧洲理事会应修改其 2016 年决定，将匈牙利担任欧盟理事会主席国的时间推迟至《欧盟条约》第 7(1) 条监督程序顺利完成之时。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Why an EU country under the surveillance procedure (Article 7.1 TEU) should not chair the Council Presidency

Mutual trust that is the bedrock of intra-EU cooperation should not be equated to ‘blind trust’ when a Member State is under the ‘surveillance’ procedure foreseen by Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union. In this perspective it would be risky for the European Council to recognise a key coordinating role, as is the case when holding the Council Presidency, to a Member State under Article 7.1 TUE. It would then be sensible for the Council to modify its 2016 Decision, and delay the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union to such a time when the Article 7(1) TEU surveillance procedure will have been successfully concluded.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

21.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Law Journal represents an authoritative new approach to the study of European Law, developed specifically to express and develop the study and understanding of European law in its social, cultural, political and economic context. It has a highly reputed board of editors. The journal fills a major gap in the current literature on all issues of European law, and is essential reading for anyone studying or practising EU law and its diverse impact on the environment, national legal systems, local government, economic organizations, and European citizens. As well as focusing on the European Union, the journal also examines the national legal systems of countries in Western, Central and Eastern Europe and relations between Europe and other parts of the world, particularly the United States, Japan, China, India, Mercosur and developing countries. The journal is published in English but is dedicated to publishing native language articles and has a dedicated translation fund available for this purpose. It is a refereed journal.