觅食行会对混种鸟群异种联合偏好的影响:区分随行物种的潜在益处

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chao-Chieh Chen, Chun-Chieh Liao, Bruno Andreas Walther
{"title":"觅食行会对混种鸟群异种联合偏好的影响:区分随行物种的潜在益处","authors":"Chao-Chieh Chen, Chun-Chieh Liao, Bruno Andreas Walther","doi":"10.1007/s10336-024-02198-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Benefits gained from participating in mixed-species bird flocks include improved foraging efficiency and reduced predation risk. However, distinguishing between these two benefits in the wild is challenging. To investigate this problem, we observed flocking behavior of attendant species and measured the heterospecific preference of association to their nearest neighbors, especially to the dominant nuclear species, Grey-cheeked Fulvetta (<i>Alcippe morrisonia</i>), in a subtropical forest of Taiwan. We found that different foraging guilds of attendant species exhibited significantly different heterospecific preferences of association in mixed flocks. Based on these preferences, we identified at least three different types of attendant species in terms of benefits gained. Two aerial foraging canopy species actively associated with foliage/perch gleaners (thus demonstrating high heterospecific preference) to catch flushed prey, consequently gaining direct foraging benefits. Three understory species and a woodpecker species followed at a distance behind the flock (thus demonstrating low heterospecific preference) to predominantly gain anti-predation benefits, because they could still eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls. Two regular attendant species, White-bellied Erpornis (<i>Erpornis zantholeuca</i>) and Rufous-capped Babbler (<i>Cyanoderma ruficeps</i>), likely gained both foraging and anti-predation benefits, because they stayed very close to the nuclear species for a long period of time. Our results suggest that attendant species that forage mainly on surface prey usually have higher heterospecific preferences of association in order to maintain activity matching and direct foraging benefits. On the other hand, attendant species that mainly exploit concealed prey have lower heterospecific preferences of association and primarily derive anti-predation benefits even when they are at a distance from the moving flock.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of foraging guild on heterospecific preference of association in mixed-species bird flocks: distinguishing potential benefits for attendant species\",\"authors\":\"Chao-Chieh Chen, Chun-Chieh Liao, Bruno Andreas Walther\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10336-024-02198-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Benefits gained from participating in mixed-species bird flocks include improved foraging efficiency and reduced predation risk. However, distinguishing between these two benefits in the wild is challenging. To investigate this problem, we observed flocking behavior of attendant species and measured the heterospecific preference of association to their nearest neighbors, especially to the dominant nuclear species, Grey-cheeked Fulvetta (<i>Alcippe morrisonia</i>), in a subtropical forest of Taiwan. We found that different foraging guilds of attendant species exhibited significantly different heterospecific preferences of association in mixed flocks. Based on these preferences, we identified at least three different types of attendant species in terms of benefits gained. Two aerial foraging canopy species actively associated with foliage/perch gleaners (thus demonstrating high heterospecific preference) to catch flushed prey, consequently gaining direct foraging benefits. Three understory species and a woodpecker species followed at a distance behind the flock (thus demonstrating low heterospecific preference) to predominantly gain anti-predation benefits, because they could still eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls. Two regular attendant species, White-bellied Erpornis (<i>Erpornis zantholeuca</i>) and Rufous-capped Babbler (<i>Cyanoderma ruficeps</i>), likely gained both foraging and anti-predation benefits, because they stayed very close to the nuclear species for a long period of time. Our results suggest that attendant species that forage mainly on surface prey usually have higher heterospecific preferences of association in order to maintain activity matching and direct foraging benefits. On the other hand, attendant species that mainly exploit concealed prey have lower heterospecific preferences of association and primarily derive anti-predation benefits even when they are at a distance from the moving flock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-024-02198-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-024-02198-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

参加混种鸟群的好处包括提高觅食效率和降低捕食风险。然而,在野外区分这两种益处是一项挑战。为了研究这个问题,我们在台湾的亚热带森林中观察了随行物种的结群行为,并测量了它们对近邻,尤其是对优势核种灰颊蝠的异种偏好。我们发现,在混群中,不同觅食行会的随从物种表现出明显不同的异种结群偏好。根据这些偏好,我们确定了至少三种不同类型的随从物种所获得的利益。两种空中觅食的冠层物种积极地与拾叶者/拾鲈者(因此表现出较高的异质性偏好)结伴捕捉冲过来的猎物,从而获得直接的觅食效益。三个底层物种和一个啄木鸟物种远远地跟在鸟群后面(因此表现出较低的异种偏好),主要是为了获得反捕食效益,因为它们仍然可以偷听到异种警报声。两个固定的随行物种--白腹二斑羚(Erpornis zantholeuca)和红帽狒狒(Cyanoderma ruficeps)--可能同时获得了觅食和反捕食的益处,因为它们在很长一段时间内都非常靠近核种。我们的研究结果表明,主要捕食地表猎物的随行物种通常具有较高的异种联合偏好,以保持活动匹配和直接的捕食效益。另一方面,主要捕食隐蔽猎物的随行物种的异质性联合偏好较低,即使它们与移动的鸟群保持一定距离,也主要是为了获得反捕食利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of foraging guild on heterospecific preference of association in mixed-species bird flocks: distinguishing potential benefits for attendant species

Influence of foraging guild on heterospecific preference of association in mixed-species bird flocks: distinguishing potential benefits for attendant species

Benefits gained from participating in mixed-species bird flocks include improved foraging efficiency and reduced predation risk. However, distinguishing between these two benefits in the wild is challenging. To investigate this problem, we observed flocking behavior of attendant species and measured the heterospecific preference of association to their nearest neighbors, especially to the dominant nuclear species, Grey-cheeked Fulvetta (Alcippe morrisonia), in a subtropical forest of Taiwan. We found that different foraging guilds of attendant species exhibited significantly different heterospecific preferences of association in mixed flocks. Based on these preferences, we identified at least three different types of attendant species in terms of benefits gained. Two aerial foraging canopy species actively associated with foliage/perch gleaners (thus demonstrating high heterospecific preference) to catch flushed prey, consequently gaining direct foraging benefits. Three understory species and a woodpecker species followed at a distance behind the flock (thus demonstrating low heterospecific preference) to predominantly gain anti-predation benefits, because they could still eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls. Two regular attendant species, White-bellied Erpornis (Erpornis zantholeuca) and Rufous-capped Babbler (Cyanoderma ruficeps), likely gained both foraging and anti-predation benefits, because they stayed very close to the nuclear species for a long period of time. Our results suggest that attendant species that forage mainly on surface prey usually have higher heterospecific preferences of association in order to maintain activity matching and direct foraging benefits. On the other hand, attendant species that mainly exploit concealed prey have lower heterospecific preferences of association and primarily derive anti-predation benefits even when they are at a distance from the moving flock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信