Abolghasem Akbari, Majid Rajabi Jaghargh, Azizan Abu Samah, Jonathan Peter Cox, Mojtaba Gholamzadeh, Alireza Araghi, Patricia M. Saco, Khabat Khosravi
{"title":"利用谷歌地球引擎评估全球陆地数据同化系统得出的半干旱地区两个不同深度的每日土壤温度","authors":"Abolghasem Akbari, Majid Rajabi Jaghargh, Azizan Abu Samah, Jonathan Peter Cox, Mojtaba Gholamzadeh, Alireza Araghi, Patricia M. Saco, Khabat Khosravi","doi":"10.1002/met.2221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Google Earth Engine (GEE) was used to investigate the performance of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) soil temperature (ST) data against observed ST from 13 synoptic stations over a semiarid region in Iran. Three-hourly ST data were collected and analyzed in two depths (0–10 cm; 40–100 cm) and 5 years. In each depth, GLDAS-Noah ST data were evaluated for daily minimum, maximum, and average ST (i.e., <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>max</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>). Based on the correlation coefficient, Kling–Gupta Efficiency, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency the overall performance of the GLDAS-Noah is 0.96, 0.66, and 0.79 for <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>; 0.97, 0.84, and 0.89 for <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>; and 0.95, 0.89, and 0.89 for <i>T</i><sub>max</sub>, respectively in the first layer. Likewise, 0.97, 0.85, and 0.86 for <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>; 0.97, 0.77, and 0.80 for <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>; and 0.97, 0.69, and 0.69 for <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> are obtained in the second layer. However, there is a significant negative bias which tends to underestimate ST in the two investigated layers, given by an average bias over all the stations analyzed of −24%, −12%, and −5% for <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> in the first layer, and average bias of −8%, −13%, and −17% for <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> in the second layer. This study reveals that GLDAS-Noah-derived ST can be used in arid regions where little or no observation data is available. Moreover, GEE performed as an advanced geospatial processing tool in regional scale analysis of ST in different layers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.2221","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of the Google Earth Engine for the evaluation of daily soil temperature derived from Global Land Data Assimilation System in two different depths over a semiarid region\",\"authors\":\"Abolghasem Akbari, Majid Rajabi Jaghargh, Azizan Abu Samah, Jonathan Peter Cox, Mojtaba Gholamzadeh, Alireza Araghi, Patricia M. Saco, Khabat Khosravi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/met.2221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Google Earth Engine (GEE) was used to investigate the performance of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) soil temperature (ST) data against observed ST from 13 synoptic stations over a semiarid region in Iran. Three-hourly ST data were collected and analyzed in two depths (0–10 cm; 40–100 cm) and 5 years. In each depth, GLDAS-Noah ST data were evaluated for daily minimum, maximum, and average ST (i.e., <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>max</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>). Based on the correlation coefficient, Kling–Gupta Efficiency, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency the overall performance of the GLDAS-Noah is 0.96, 0.66, and 0.79 for <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>; 0.97, 0.84, and 0.89 for <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>; and 0.95, 0.89, and 0.89 for <i>T</i><sub>max</sub>, respectively in the first layer. Likewise, 0.97, 0.85, and 0.86 for <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>; 0.97, 0.77, and 0.80 for <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>; and 0.97, 0.69, and 0.69 for <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> are obtained in the second layer. However, there is a significant negative bias which tends to underestimate ST in the two investigated layers, given by an average bias over all the stations analyzed of −24%, −12%, and −5% for <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> in the first layer, and average bias of −8%, −13%, and −17% for <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> in the second layer. This study reveals that GLDAS-Noah-derived ST can be used in arid regions where little or no observation data is available. Moreover, GEE performed as an advanced geospatial processing tool in regional scale analysis of ST in different layers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteorological Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.2221\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteorological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.2221\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.2221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilization of the Google Earth Engine for the evaluation of daily soil temperature derived from Global Land Data Assimilation System in two different depths over a semiarid region
The Google Earth Engine (GEE) was used to investigate the performance of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) soil temperature (ST) data against observed ST from 13 synoptic stations over a semiarid region in Iran. Three-hourly ST data were collected and analyzed in two depths (0–10 cm; 40–100 cm) and 5 years. In each depth, GLDAS-Noah ST data were evaluated for daily minimum, maximum, and average ST (i.e., Tmin, Tmax, and Tavg). Based on the correlation coefficient, Kling–Gupta Efficiency, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency the overall performance of the GLDAS-Noah is 0.96, 0.66, and 0.79 for Tmin; 0.97, 0.84, and 0.89 for Tavg; and 0.95, 0.89, and 0.89 for Tmax, respectively in the first layer. Likewise, 0.97, 0.85, and 0.86 for Tmin; 0.97, 0.77, and 0.80 for Tavg; and 0.97, 0.69, and 0.69 for Tmax are obtained in the second layer. However, there is a significant negative bias which tends to underestimate ST in the two investigated layers, given by an average bias over all the stations analyzed of −24%, −12%, and −5% for Tmin, Tavg, and Tmax in the first layer, and average bias of −8%, −13%, and −17% for Tmin, Tavg, and Tmax in the second layer. This study reveals that GLDAS-Noah-derived ST can be used in arid regions where little or no observation data is available. Moreover, GEE performed as an advanced geospatial processing tool in regional scale analysis of ST in different layers.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Meteorological Applications is to serve the needs of applied meteorologists, forecasters and users of meteorological services by publishing papers on all aspects of meteorological science, including:
applications of meteorological, climatological, analytical and forecasting data, and their socio-economic benefits;
forecasting, warning and service delivery techniques and methods;
weather hazards, their analysis and prediction;
performance, verification and value of numerical models and forecasting services;
practical applications of ocean and climate models;
education and training.