某种程度上:阿卡拉卡哲学论著中作为阿内卡文塔达和纳雅文塔达综合体的萨达瓦达(Syādvāda

IF 0.4 2区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Shree Nahata
{"title":"某种程度上:阿卡拉卡哲学论著中作为阿内卡文塔达和纳雅文塔达综合体的萨达瓦达(Syādvāda","authors":"Shree Nahata","doi":"10.1007/s10781-024-09575-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the relationship between the theory of many-sidedness (<i>anekāntavāda</i>), the theory of viewpoints (<i>nayavāda</i>), and the theory of sevenfold conditional predication (<i>syādvāda</i>) in the philosophical monographs of the Jaina philosopher Akalaṅka (c. 720-780 CE). Despite being celebrated as novel Jaina contributions to Indian philosophy, the mutual relationship between these three theories is poorly understood. Do these three theories represent three distinct frameworks with distinct purposes? Or do these three theories ultimately synthesise to form a single unified framework? Through a careful study of the <i>Laghīyastraya</i> and the <i>Nyāyaviniścaya</i>, this paper shows how Akalaṅka understands <i>syādvāda</i> as the central organising framework for integrating the theory of many-sidedness and the theory of viewpoints. On the one hand, <i>syādvāda</i> is analysed as the synthesis of multiple viewpoints because each of the seven conditional predications, when taken individually, represents a genuine viewpoint. On the other hand, the seven conditional predications of <i>syādvāda</i>, when taken collectively and iterated with respect to different characteristics, represent the linguistic formalisation of many-sided (<i>anekānta</i>) Jaina ontology. This paper shows how <i>syādvāda</i> as the grand synthesis of the theory of many-sidedness and the theory of viewpoints creates new possibilities as well as new problems within Akalaṅka’s philosophical system.</p>","PeriodicalId":51854,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Some Ways: Syādvāda as the Synthesis of Anekāntavāda and Nayavāda in Akalaṅka’s Philosophical Treatises\",\"authors\":\"Shree Nahata\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10781-024-09575-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper investigates the relationship between the theory of many-sidedness (<i>anekāntavāda</i>), the theory of viewpoints (<i>nayavāda</i>), and the theory of sevenfold conditional predication (<i>syādvāda</i>) in the philosophical monographs of the Jaina philosopher Akalaṅka (c. 720-780 CE). Despite being celebrated as novel Jaina contributions to Indian philosophy, the mutual relationship between these three theories is poorly understood. Do these three theories represent three distinct frameworks with distinct purposes? Or do these three theories ultimately synthesise to form a single unified framework? Through a careful study of the <i>Laghīyastraya</i> and the <i>Nyāyaviniścaya</i>, this paper shows how Akalaṅka understands <i>syādvāda</i> as the central organising framework for integrating the theory of many-sidedness and the theory of viewpoints. On the one hand, <i>syādvāda</i> is analysed as the synthesis of multiple viewpoints because each of the seven conditional predications, when taken individually, represents a genuine viewpoint. On the other hand, the seven conditional predications of <i>syādvāda</i>, when taken collectively and iterated with respect to different characteristics, represent the linguistic formalisation of many-sided (<i>anekānta</i>) Jaina ontology. This paper shows how <i>syādvāda</i> as the grand synthesis of the theory of many-sidedness and the theory of viewpoints creates new possibilities as well as new problems within Akalaṅka’s philosophical system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-024-09575-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-024-09575-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了耆那教哲学家阿卡拉卡(Akalaṅka,约公元 720-780 年)哲学专著中的多面性理论(anekāntavāda)、观点理论(nayavāda)和七重条件谓词理论(syādvāda)之间的关系。尽管这三种理论被誉为耆那教对印度哲学的新贡献,但人们对它们之间的相互关系却知之甚少。这三种理论是否代表了具有不同目的的三种不同框架?还是这三种理论最终会综合形成一个统一的框架?本文通过对《大智度论》(Laghīyastraya)和《瑜伽师地论》(Nyāyaviniścaya)的仔细研究,说明了阿卡拉卡是如何将 "多面性理论"(syādvāda)理解为整合 "多面性理论 "和 "观点理论 "的核心组织框架的。一方面,syādvāda 被分析为多种观点的综合,因为七个条件谓词中的每一个单独来看都代表一种真正的观点。另一方面,"syādvāda "的七个条件谓词如果合在一起并根据不同的特征反复使用,则代表了多面(anekānta)耆那教本体论的语言形式化。本文展示了 syādvāda 作为多面性理论和观点理论的大综合如何在阿卡拉卡的哲学体系中创造了新的可能性和新的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In Some Ways: Syādvāda as the Synthesis of Anekāntavāda and Nayavāda in Akalaṅka’s Philosophical Treatises

In Some Ways: Syādvāda as the Synthesis of Anekāntavāda and Nayavāda in Akalaṅka’s Philosophical Treatises

This paper investigates the relationship between the theory of many-sidedness (anekāntavāda), the theory of viewpoints (nayavāda), and the theory of sevenfold conditional predication (syādvāda) in the philosophical monographs of the Jaina philosopher Akalaṅka (c. 720-780 CE). Despite being celebrated as novel Jaina contributions to Indian philosophy, the mutual relationship between these three theories is poorly understood. Do these three theories represent three distinct frameworks with distinct purposes? Or do these three theories ultimately synthesise to form a single unified framework? Through a careful study of the Laghīyastraya and the Nyāyaviniścaya, this paper shows how Akalaṅka understands syādvāda as the central organising framework for integrating the theory of many-sidedness and the theory of viewpoints. On the one hand, syādvāda is analysed as the synthesis of multiple viewpoints because each of the seven conditional predications, when taken individually, represents a genuine viewpoint. On the other hand, the seven conditional predications of syādvāda, when taken collectively and iterated with respect to different characteristics, represent the linguistic formalisation of many-sided (anekānta) Jaina ontology. This paper shows how syādvāda as the grand synthesis of the theory of many-sidedness and the theory of viewpoints creates new possibilities as well as new problems within Akalaṅka’s philosophical system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Philosophy publishes articles on various aspects of Indian thought, classical and modern. Articles range from close analysis of individual philosophical texts to detailed annotated translations of texts. The journal also publishes more speculative discussions of philosophical issues based on a close reading of primary sources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信