{"title":"特定年龄死亡率可预测后代质量和数量的体重比例","authors":"Douglas S. Glazier","doi":"10.1007/s10682-024-10307-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Why offspring size and number vary in diverse ways with adult body size is little understood. In my comparative analysis of animal taxa, I show that age-specific mortality predicts the interspecific body-mass (BM) scaling of offspring (egg, embryo, or neonate) mass (OM) and number per clutch (CS) with striking accuracy. Across six animal taxa, the mean ratio of juvenile to adult mortality (m<sub>j</sub>/m<sub>a</sub>) explains 80% and 88% of the variation in BM scaling slopes for OM and CS, respectively. Animal taxa with high parental care and low mj/ma ratios tend to exhibit steeper OM scaling and shallower CS scaling than taxa with low parental care and high m<sub>j</sub>/m<sub>a</sub> ratios. Even the curvature of OM scaling in logarithmic space can be predicted approximately by the difference in the BM scaling slopes of juvenile and adult mortality rates. The overall triangular pattern of variation in OM in relation to BM in animals can be understood in terms of body-size dependent variation in m<sub>j</sub>/m<sub>a</sub>, as well. These results are explained by an ‘age-specific mortality hypothesis’, which posits that OM and CS scaling slopes are functions of the relative emphasis of natural selection on offspring versus parental fitness. Therefore, I recommend that future studies of the body-size scaling of life-history traits should include estimates of age-specific mortality. In general, it is becoming clear that a mortality perspective can provide useful insight into many kinds of biological and ecological scaling relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":55158,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Ecology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-specific mortality predicts body-mass scaling of offspring mass and number\",\"authors\":\"Douglas S. Glazier\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10682-024-10307-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Why offspring size and number vary in diverse ways with adult body size is little understood. In my comparative analysis of animal taxa, I show that age-specific mortality predicts the interspecific body-mass (BM) scaling of offspring (egg, embryo, or neonate) mass (OM) and number per clutch (CS) with striking accuracy. Across six animal taxa, the mean ratio of juvenile to adult mortality (m<sub>j</sub>/m<sub>a</sub>) explains 80% and 88% of the variation in BM scaling slopes for OM and CS, respectively. Animal taxa with high parental care and low mj/ma ratios tend to exhibit steeper OM scaling and shallower CS scaling than taxa with low parental care and high m<sub>j</sub>/m<sub>a</sub> ratios. Even the curvature of OM scaling in logarithmic space can be predicted approximately by the difference in the BM scaling slopes of juvenile and adult mortality rates. The overall triangular pattern of variation in OM in relation to BM in animals can be understood in terms of body-size dependent variation in m<sub>j</sub>/m<sub>a</sub>, as well. These results are explained by an ‘age-specific mortality hypothesis’, which posits that OM and CS scaling slopes are functions of the relative emphasis of natural selection on offspring versus parental fitness. Therefore, I recommend that future studies of the body-size scaling of life-history traits should include estimates of age-specific mortality. In general, it is becoming clear that a mortality perspective can provide useful insight into many kinds of biological and ecological scaling relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Ecology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10307-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10307-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为什么后代的大小和数量会随成年体型的不同而有不同的变化,人们对此知之甚少。在我对动物类群的比较分析中,我发现年龄特异性死亡率可以预测后代(卵、胚胎或新生儿)质量(OM)和每窝数量(CS)的种间体重(BM)比例,其准确性令人震惊。在六个动物类群中,幼体与成体死亡率的平均比值(mj/ma)分别解释了OM和CS体重缩放斜率变化的80%和88%。与亲代照料程度低、mj/ma 比率高的动物类群相比,亲代照料程度高、mj/ma 比率低的动物类群往往表现出更陡峭的 OM 坡度和更浅的 CS 坡度。即使是对数空间中的 OM 缩放曲线,也可以通过幼年死亡率和成年死亡率的 BM 缩放斜率差异来大致预测。动物 OM 随 BM 变化的总体三角形模式也可以从 mj/ma 随体型变化的角度来理解。这些结果可以用 "特定年龄死亡率假说 "来解释,该假说认为 OM 和 CS 的比例斜率是自然选择对后代和亲代健康的相对重视程度的函数。因此,我建议今后对生命史特征的体型缩放研究应包括对特定年龄死亡率的估计。总的来说,死亡率视角可以为多种生物和生态缩放关系提供有用的见解,这一点已变得越来越清楚。
Age-specific mortality predicts body-mass scaling of offspring mass and number
Why offspring size and number vary in diverse ways with adult body size is little understood. In my comparative analysis of animal taxa, I show that age-specific mortality predicts the interspecific body-mass (BM) scaling of offspring (egg, embryo, or neonate) mass (OM) and number per clutch (CS) with striking accuracy. Across six animal taxa, the mean ratio of juvenile to adult mortality (mj/ma) explains 80% and 88% of the variation in BM scaling slopes for OM and CS, respectively. Animal taxa with high parental care and low mj/ma ratios tend to exhibit steeper OM scaling and shallower CS scaling than taxa with low parental care and high mj/ma ratios. Even the curvature of OM scaling in logarithmic space can be predicted approximately by the difference in the BM scaling slopes of juvenile and adult mortality rates. The overall triangular pattern of variation in OM in relation to BM in animals can be understood in terms of body-size dependent variation in mj/ma, as well. These results are explained by an ‘age-specific mortality hypothesis’, which posits that OM and CS scaling slopes are functions of the relative emphasis of natural selection on offspring versus parental fitness. Therefore, I recommend that future studies of the body-size scaling of life-history traits should include estimates of age-specific mortality. In general, it is becoming clear that a mortality perspective can provide useful insight into many kinds of biological and ecological scaling relationships.
期刊介绍:
Evolutionary Ecology is a concept-oriented journal of biological research at the interface of ecology and evolution. We publish papers that therefore integrate both fields of research: research that seeks to explain the ecology of organisms in the context of evolution, or patterns of evolution as explained by ecological processes.
The journal publishes original research and discussion concerning the evolutionary ecology of organisms. These may include papers addressing evolutionary aspects of population ecology, organismal interactions and coevolution, behaviour, life histories, communication, morphology, host-parasite interactions and disease ecology, as well as ecological aspects of genetic processes. The objective is to promote the conceptual, theoretical and empirical development of ecology and evolutionary biology; the scope extends to any organism or system.
In additional to Original Research articles, we publish Review articles that survey recent developments in the field of evolutionary ecology; Ideas & Perspectives articles which present new points of view and novel hypotheses; and Comments on articles recently published in Evolutionary Ecology or elsewhere. We also welcome New Tests of Existing Ideas - testing well-established hypotheses but with broader data or more methodologically rigorous approaches; - and shorter Natural History Notes, which aim to present new observations of organismal biology in the wild that may provide inspiration for future research. As of 2018, we now also invite Methods papers, to present or review new theoretical, practical or analytical methods used in evolutionary ecology.
Students & Early Career Researchers: We particularly encourage, and offer incentives for, submission of Reviews, Ideas & Perspectives, and Methods papers by students and early-career researchers (defined as being within one year of award of a PhD degree) – see Students & Early Career Researchers