Jacopo Franzoni, Giovanni Astuti, Fabrizio Bartolucci, Liliana Bernardo, Simone Fior, Gabriele Casazza, Fabio Conti, Duilio Iamonico, Mauro Iberite, Luigi Minuto, Alessia Turini, Lorenzo Peruzzi
{"title":"不同物种还是海拔形态?测试石竹(石竹科)的分类价值","authors":"Jacopo Franzoni, Giovanni Astuti, Fabrizio Bartolucci, Liliana Bernardo, Simone Fior, Gabriele Casazza, Fabio Conti, Duilio Iamonico, Mauro Iberite, Luigi Minuto, Alessia Turini, Lorenzo Peruzzi","doi":"10.1002/tax.13237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defining species boundaries within plant groups distributed along wide elevational and geographic gradients may lead to unstable taxonomic delimitations using morphological data only. Within the taxonomically challenging genus <jats:italic>Dianthus</jats:italic>, through an integrative approach we tested the taxonomic value of <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic>, a putative species endemic to mountain peaks of the central‐southern Apennines, with respect to the widespread central‐Mediterranean <jats:italic>D. virgineus</jats:italic>. We measured 30 morphological characters in 452 individuals from 25 populations and obtained 3202 single nucleotide polymorphisms using ddRAD‐seq techniques in 394 individuals from 36 populations. For climatic niche comparison, we built a dataset of 348 occurrence points. By comparing morphometric, genetic, and climatic niche data, we showed that <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic> cannot be considered a distinct species. Morphometric separation between the two species is detectable, but high‐elevation populations of <jats:italic>D. virgineus</jats:italic> are similar to <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic>. Genetic analyses revealed that the genetic structure of populations of <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>D. virgineus</jats:italic> is mainly shaped by isolation‐by‐distance, irrespective of their taxonomic attribution. The climatic niches of the two species are overlapping, and the niche differences are just due to different availability of climatic conditions in their ranges. Accordingly, multiple lines of evidence do not support a separation of <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic> from <jats:italic>D. virgineus</jats:italic>, and the former should be considered a heterotypic synonym of the latter.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"1475 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different species or altitudinal morphotypes? Testing the taxonomic value of Dianthus brachycalyx (Caryophyllaceae)\",\"authors\":\"Jacopo Franzoni, Giovanni Astuti, Fabrizio Bartolucci, Liliana Bernardo, Simone Fior, Gabriele Casazza, Fabio Conti, Duilio Iamonico, Mauro Iberite, Luigi Minuto, Alessia Turini, Lorenzo Peruzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tax.13237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defining species boundaries within plant groups distributed along wide elevational and geographic gradients may lead to unstable taxonomic delimitations using morphological data only. Within the taxonomically challenging genus <jats:italic>Dianthus</jats:italic>, through an integrative approach we tested the taxonomic value of <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic>, a putative species endemic to mountain peaks of the central‐southern Apennines, with respect to the widespread central‐Mediterranean <jats:italic>D. virgineus</jats:italic>. We measured 30 morphological characters in 452 individuals from 25 populations and obtained 3202 single nucleotide polymorphisms using ddRAD‐seq techniques in 394 individuals from 36 populations. For climatic niche comparison, we built a dataset of 348 occurrence points. By comparing morphometric, genetic, and climatic niche data, we showed that <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic> cannot be considered a distinct species. Morphometric separation between the two species is detectable, but high‐elevation populations of <jats:italic>D. virgineus</jats:italic> are similar to <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic>. Genetic analyses revealed that the genetic structure of populations of <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>D. virgineus</jats:italic> is mainly shaped by isolation‐by‐distance, irrespective of their taxonomic attribution. The climatic niches of the two species are overlapping, and the niche differences are just due to different availability of climatic conditions in their ranges. Accordingly, multiple lines of evidence do not support a separation of <jats:italic>D. brachycalyx</jats:italic> from <jats:italic>D. virgineus</jats:italic>, and the former should be considered a heterotypic synonym of the latter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taxon\",\"volume\":\"1475 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taxon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13237\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taxon","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在分布于海拔和地理梯度较宽的植物群落中界定物种边界时,仅使用形态学数据可能会导致不稳定的分类界定。在分类上极具挑战性的石竹属中,我们通过综合方法测试了亚平宁半岛中南部山峰上特有的假定物种 D. brachycalyx 与广泛分布于地中海中部的 D. virgineus 的分类价值。我们测量了 25 个种群 452 个个体的 30 个形态特征,并利用 ddRAD-seq 技术获得了 36 个种群 394 个个体的 3202 个单核苷酸多态性。为了进行气候生态位比较,我们建立了一个包含 348 个出现点的数据集。通过比较形态计量学、遗传学和气候生态位数据,我们发现D. brachycalyx不能被视为一个独立的物种。这两个物种之间的形态学分离是可以检测到的,但高海拔地区的D. virgineus种群与D. Brachycalyx相似。遗传分析表明,无论分类学归属如何,D. brachycalyx 和 D. virgineus 种群的遗传结构主要是由距离隔离形成的。这两个物种的气候生态位是重叠的,而生态位差异只是由于其分布区的气候条件不同造成的。因此,多种证据都不支持将 D. brachycalyx 与 D. virgineus 区分开来,前者应被视为后者的异型异名。
Different species or altitudinal morphotypes? Testing the taxonomic value of Dianthus brachycalyx (Caryophyllaceae)
Defining species boundaries within plant groups distributed along wide elevational and geographic gradients may lead to unstable taxonomic delimitations using morphological data only. Within the taxonomically challenging genus Dianthus, through an integrative approach we tested the taxonomic value of D. brachycalyx, a putative species endemic to mountain peaks of the central‐southern Apennines, with respect to the widespread central‐Mediterranean D. virgineus. We measured 30 morphological characters in 452 individuals from 25 populations and obtained 3202 single nucleotide polymorphisms using ddRAD‐seq techniques in 394 individuals from 36 populations. For climatic niche comparison, we built a dataset of 348 occurrence points. By comparing morphometric, genetic, and climatic niche data, we showed that D. brachycalyx cannot be considered a distinct species. Morphometric separation between the two species is detectable, but high‐elevation populations of D. virgineus are similar to D. brachycalyx. Genetic analyses revealed that the genetic structure of populations of D. brachycalyx and D. virgineus is mainly shaped by isolation‐by‐distance, irrespective of their taxonomic attribution. The climatic niches of the two species are overlapping, and the niche differences are just due to different availability of climatic conditions in their ranges. Accordingly, multiple lines of evidence do not support a separation of D. brachycalyx from D. virgineus, and the former should be considered a heterotypic synonym of the latter.
期刊介绍:
TAXON is the bi-monthly journal of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy and is devoted to systematic and evolutionary biology with emphasis on plants and fungi. It is published bimonthly by the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, c/o Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. Details of page charges are given in the Guidelines for authors. Papers will be reviewed by at least two specialists.