鸟类与哺乳:奥古斯丁和女权主义者对凯诺西斯的关注

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Modern Theology Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1111/moth.12960
Han‐luen Kantzer Komline
{"title":"鸟类与哺乳:奥古斯丁和女权主义者对凯诺西斯的关注","authors":"Han‐luen Kantzer Komline","doi":"10.1111/moth.12960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The doctrine of kenosis has kept a low profile in studies of the early church. Yet the biblical idea that Christ “emptied himself” was taken up not only by proponents of kenoticism in the nineteenth century, but also—inevitably—by early Christian thinkers as they interpreted Philippians 2:5‐11, a crucial passage about the identity and spirit of Jesus Christ. Augustine, for example, references kenosis repeatedly across his writings. The notion of kenosis has also been a tenacious thread in the tapestry of feminist theological reflections over the last twenty years. This article weaves these strands together, arguing that three emphases of Augustine's account help to address concerns that feminist theologians have raised: his explication of kenosis as utterly unique and only analogically imitable; his description of kenosis as always additive; and his characterization of kenosis as an irresolvable paradox. This essay develops Augustine's emphases in conversation with recent feminist scholarship—drawing, along the way, on his surprising appeal to the behavior of mother birds and maternal breastfeeding—to suggest some new vantage points for appreciating how the Christian doctrine of kenosis can promote flourishing, for the subject as well as the object of self‐giving love.","PeriodicalId":18945,"journal":{"name":"Modern Theology","volume":"201 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of Birds and Breastfeeding: Augustine and Feminist Concerns about Kenosis\",\"authors\":\"Han‐luen Kantzer Komline\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/moth.12960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The doctrine of kenosis has kept a low profile in studies of the early church. Yet the biblical idea that Christ “emptied himself” was taken up not only by proponents of kenoticism in the nineteenth century, but also—inevitably—by early Christian thinkers as they interpreted Philippians 2:5‐11, a crucial passage about the identity and spirit of Jesus Christ. Augustine, for example, references kenosis repeatedly across his writings. The notion of kenosis has also been a tenacious thread in the tapestry of feminist theological reflections over the last twenty years. This article weaves these strands together, arguing that three emphases of Augustine's account help to address concerns that feminist theologians have raised: his explication of kenosis as utterly unique and only analogically imitable; his description of kenosis as always additive; and his characterization of kenosis as an irresolvable paradox. This essay develops Augustine's emphases in conversation with recent feminist scholarship—drawing, along the way, on his surprising appeal to the behavior of mother birds and maternal breastfeeding—to suggest some new vantage points for appreciating how the Christian doctrine of kenosis can promote flourishing, for the subject as well as the object of self‐giving love.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Theology\",\"volume\":\"201 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12960\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对早期教会的研究中,"弃绝 "学说的地位一直不高。然而,《圣经》中关于基督 "虚己 "的观点不仅在十九世纪被基诺论的支持者所接受,而且在早期基督教思想家解释《腓立比书》2:5-11这段关于耶稣基督身份和精神的重要经文时,也不可避免地接受了这一观点。例如,奥古斯丁在他的著作中多次提到了 "凯诺西斯"(kenosis)。在过去二十年的女权主义神学思考中,"凯诺西斯 "的概念也一直是一条顽强的线索。本文将这些线索编织在一起,认为奥古斯丁论述中的三个重点有助于解决女性主义神学家提出的问题:他将 "基诺索斯"(kenosis)阐释为完全独特且只能类比模仿;他将 "基诺索斯"(kenosis)描述为总是相加的;以及他将 "基诺索斯"(kenosis)描述为无法解决的悖论。这篇文章将奥古斯丁的论述重点与最新的女性主义学术研究相结合,同时借鉴他对母鸟行为和母性哺乳的惊人呼吁,提出了一些新的视点,以理解基督教的 "神启 "教义如何促进自我给予之爱的主体和客体的繁荣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Of Birds and Breastfeeding: Augustine and Feminist Concerns about Kenosis
The doctrine of kenosis has kept a low profile in studies of the early church. Yet the biblical idea that Christ “emptied himself” was taken up not only by proponents of kenoticism in the nineteenth century, but also—inevitably—by early Christian thinkers as they interpreted Philippians 2:5‐11, a crucial passage about the identity and spirit of Jesus Christ. Augustine, for example, references kenosis repeatedly across his writings. The notion of kenosis has also been a tenacious thread in the tapestry of feminist theological reflections over the last twenty years. This article weaves these strands together, arguing that three emphases of Augustine's account help to address concerns that feminist theologians have raised: his explication of kenosis as utterly unique and only analogically imitable; his description of kenosis as always additive; and his characterization of kenosis as an irresolvable paradox. This essay develops Augustine's emphases in conversation with recent feminist scholarship—drawing, along the way, on his surprising appeal to the behavior of mother birds and maternal breastfeeding—to suggest some new vantage points for appreciating how the Christian doctrine of kenosis can promote flourishing, for the subject as well as the object of self‐giving love.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Theology
Modern Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信