Ana Ganicho, Sofia Magalhães, Teresa Limpo, Marina S. Lemos, Diana Alves
{"title":"SSIS SEL简易量表--学生表:检验葡萄牙语版本的结构有效性","authors":"Ana Ganicho, Sofia Magalhães, Teresa Limpo, Marina S. Lemos, Diana Alves","doi":"10.1007/s10566-024-09816-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Despite the increased use of social and emotional learning (SEL) programs, empirical research is hindered by lengthy assessment options, difficult to fit into educational contexts. To cover these needs, the Social Skills Improvement System SEL Brief Scales – Student Form (SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-S) was developed. Although it has been translated into several languages, a Portuguese version with sound psychometric properties is still missing.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to develop the Portuguese version (SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-Spt) and to examine its psychometric properties. METHODS: After translating the original SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-S to Portuguese, the instrument was administered to 200 5th graders, along with self- and hetero-report measures of school well-being and involvement, peer acceptance, and academic achievement. We examined the SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-Spt factorial validity and reliability, tested its correlations with external correlates, and examined the instruments’ predictive validity.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Results supported a three-factor structure of the scale, which included the dimensions of intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, and responsible decision-making. Correlations with external correlates were in the expected direction. Moreover, the scale predicted school involvement and later academic achievement.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study seems to corroborate and extend previous knowledge about the validity of SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-S, offering validity and reliability evidence on the scale’s three-factor structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":47479,"journal":{"name":"Child & Youth Care Forum","volume":"263 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Student Form: Examining the Structural Validity of a Portuguese Version\",\"authors\":\"Ana Ganicho, Sofia Magalhães, Teresa Limpo, Marina S. Lemos, Diana Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10566-024-09816-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Despite the increased use of social and emotional learning (SEL) programs, empirical research is hindered by lengthy assessment options, difficult to fit into educational contexts. To cover these needs, the Social Skills Improvement System SEL Brief Scales – Student Form (SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-S) was developed. Although it has been translated into several languages, a Portuguese version with sound psychometric properties is still missing.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to develop the Portuguese version (SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-Spt) and to examine its psychometric properties. METHODS: After translating the original SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-S to Portuguese, the instrument was administered to 200 5th graders, along with self- and hetero-report measures of school well-being and involvement, peer acceptance, and academic achievement. We examined the SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-Spt factorial validity and reliability, tested its correlations with external correlates, and examined the instruments’ predictive validity.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Results supported a three-factor structure of the scale, which included the dimensions of intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, and responsible decision-making. Correlations with external correlates were in the expected direction. Moreover, the scale predicted school involvement and later academic achievement.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study seems to corroborate and extend previous knowledge about the validity of SSIS SEL<i>b</i>-S, offering validity and reliability evidence on the scale’s three-factor structure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Youth Care Forum\",\"volume\":\"263 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Youth Care Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-024-09816-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Youth Care Forum","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-024-09816-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Student Form: Examining the Structural Validity of a Portuguese Version
Background
Despite the increased use of social and emotional learning (SEL) programs, empirical research is hindered by lengthy assessment options, difficult to fit into educational contexts. To cover these needs, the Social Skills Improvement System SEL Brief Scales – Student Form (SSIS SELb-S) was developed. Although it has been translated into several languages, a Portuguese version with sound psychometric properties is still missing.
Objective
This study aimed to develop the Portuguese version (SSIS SELb-Spt) and to examine its psychometric properties. METHODS: After translating the original SSIS SELb-S to Portuguese, the instrument was administered to 200 5th graders, along with self- and hetero-report measures of school well-being and involvement, peer acceptance, and academic achievement. We examined the SSIS SELb-Spt factorial validity and reliability, tested its correlations with external correlates, and examined the instruments’ predictive validity.
Results
Results supported a three-factor structure of the scale, which included the dimensions of intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, and responsible decision-making. Correlations with external correlates were in the expected direction. Moreover, the scale predicted school involvement and later academic achievement.
Conclusion
This study seems to corroborate and extend previous knowledge about the validity of SSIS SELb-S, offering validity and reliability evidence on the scale’s three-factor structure.
期刊介绍:
Child & Youth Care Forum is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary publication that welcomes submissions – original empirical research papers and theoretical reviews as well as invited commentaries – on children, youth, and families. Contributions to Child & Youth Care Forum are submitted by researchers, practitioners, and clinicians across the interrelated disciplines of child psychology, early childhood, education, medical anthropology, pediatrics, pediatric psychology, psychiatry, public policy, school/educational psychology, social work, and sociology as well as government agencies and corporate and nonprofit organizations that seek to advance current knowledge and practice. Child & Youth Care Forum publishes scientifically rigorous, empirical papers and theoretical reviews that have implications for child and adolescent mental health, psychosocial development, assessment, interventions, and services broadly defined. For example, papers may address issues of child and adolescent typical and/or atypical development through effective youth care assessment and intervention practices. In addition, papers may address strategies for helping youth overcome difficulties (e.g., mental health problems) or overcome adversity (e.g., traumatic stress, community violence) as well as all children actualize their potential (e.g., positive psychology goals). Assessment papers that advance knowledge as well as methodological papers with implications for child and youth research and care are also encouraged.