{"title":"选举民意调查中的无回复计算:误差总幅度","authors":"Jeff Dominitz, Charles F. Manski","doi":"arxiv-2407.19339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential impact of nonresponse on election polls is well known and\nfrequently acknowledged. Yet measurement and reporting of polling error has\nfocused solely on sampling error, represented by the margin of error of a poll.\nSurvey statisticians have long recommended measurement of the total survey\nerror of a sample estimate by its mean square error (MSE), which jointly\nmeasures sampling and non-sampling errors. Extending the conventional language\nof polling, we think it reasonable to use the square root of maximum MSE to\nmeasure the total margin of error. This paper demonstrates how to measure the\npotential impact of nonresponse using the concept of the total margin of error,\nwhich we argue should be a standard feature in the reporting of election poll\nresults. We first show how to jointly measure statistical imprecision and\nresponse bias when a pollster lacks any knowledge of the candidate preferences\nof non-responders. We then extend the analysis to settings where the pollster\nhas partial knowledge that bounds the preferences of non-responders.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"169 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for Nonresponse in Election Polls: Total Margin of Error\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Dominitz, Charles F. Manski\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.19339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The potential impact of nonresponse on election polls is well known and\\nfrequently acknowledged. Yet measurement and reporting of polling error has\\nfocused solely on sampling error, represented by the margin of error of a poll.\\nSurvey statisticians have long recommended measurement of the total survey\\nerror of a sample estimate by its mean square error (MSE), which jointly\\nmeasures sampling and non-sampling errors. Extending the conventional language\\nof polling, we think it reasonable to use the square root of maximum MSE to\\nmeasure the total margin of error. This paper demonstrates how to measure the\\npotential impact of nonresponse using the concept of the total margin of error,\\nwhich we argue should be a standard feature in the reporting of election poll\\nresults. We first show how to jointly measure statistical imprecision and\\nresponse bias when a pollster lacks any knowledge of the candidate preferences\\nof non-responders. We then extend the analysis to settings where the pollster\\nhas partial knowledge that bounds the preferences of non-responders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"169 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accounting for Nonresponse in Election Polls: Total Margin of Error
The potential impact of nonresponse on election polls is well known and
frequently acknowledged. Yet measurement and reporting of polling error has
focused solely on sampling error, represented by the margin of error of a poll.
Survey statisticians have long recommended measurement of the total survey
error of a sample estimate by its mean square error (MSE), which jointly
measures sampling and non-sampling errors. Extending the conventional language
of polling, we think it reasonable to use the square root of maximum MSE to
measure the total margin of error. This paper demonstrates how to measure the
potential impact of nonresponse using the concept of the total margin of error,
which we argue should be a standard feature in the reporting of election poll
results. We first show how to jointly measure statistical imprecision and
response bias when a pollster lacks any knowledge of the candidate preferences
of non-responders. We then extend the analysis to settings where the pollster
has partial knowledge that bounds the preferences of non-responders.