分析花在练习题上的时间对普通化学学生解决问题能力的影响

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Neha Gondra, Sloka Suresh, Auddy Anilao, Stephanie Toy, Sandhya B. Pfile, Brandon J. Vernoy, Josh M. Y. Lee, Rachana Raghavendra, Akshaya Ravi, Ozcan Gulacar
{"title":"分析花在练习题上的时间对普通化学学生解决问题能力的影响","authors":"Neha Gondra, Sloka Suresh, Auddy Anilao, Stephanie Toy, Sandhya B. Pfile, Brandon J. Vernoy, Josh M. Y. Lee, Rachana Raghavendra, Akshaya Ravi, Ozcan Gulacar","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemistry teachers globally recognize the value of additional practice and offer students worksheets to enhance their skills and comprehension of material introduced in a limited class time. However, these static worksheets have limitations as they expose students to only a limited range of questions. As a result, online homework systems featuring adaptive technology have gained popularity, as they provide a more comprehensive learning experience and valuable feedback. Despite their potential to improve understanding, it has been observed that homework scores do not necessarily correlate with the exam performance. This is attributed to some students being impatient and relying on the provided solutions instead of finding their own. These students believe that memorizing solutions is enough to solve problems included in exams. Therefore, they lose opportunities to develop the necessary mental and emotional endurance required for independent problem-solving. To investigate the impact of time spent on each question before resorting to solutions, 91 general chemistry students were divided into three groups─minimum, average, and maximum─based on the time allotted for solving intervention questions. The results revealed that the minimum and average time groups benefited equally but the performance of the maximum time group declined. The data on completion rates of the intervention questions pointed out the increasing potential impact of mental and emotional fatigue caused by the extended time needed for each question. Based on these findings, a few recommendations were made for educators and publishers to improve the effectiveness of chemistry instruction.","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the Impact of Time Spent on Practice Questions on General Chemistry Students’ Problem-Solving Performance\",\"authors\":\"Neha Gondra, Sloka Suresh, Auddy Anilao, Stephanie Toy, Sandhya B. Pfile, Brandon J. Vernoy, Josh M. Y. Lee, Rachana Raghavendra, Akshaya Ravi, Ozcan Gulacar\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chemistry teachers globally recognize the value of additional practice and offer students worksheets to enhance their skills and comprehension of material introduced in a limited class time. However, these static worksheets have limitations as they expose students to only a limited range of questions. As a result, online homework systems featuring adaptive technology have gained popularity, as they provide a more comprehensive learning experience and valuable feedback. Despite their potential to improve understanding, it has been observed that homework scores do not necessarily correlate with the exam performance. This is attributed to some students being impatient and relying on the provided solutions instead of finding their own. These students believe that memorizing solutions is enough to solve problems included in exams. Therefore, they lose opportunities to develop the necessary mental and emotional endurance required for independent problem-solving. To investigate the impact of time spent on each question before resorting to solutions, 91 general chemistry students were divided into three groups─minimum, average, and maximum─based on the time allotted for solving intervention questions. The results revealed that the minimum and average time groups benefited equally but the performance of the maximum time group declined. The data on completion rates of the intervention questions pointed out the increasing potential impact of mental and emotional fatigue caused by the extended time needed for each question. Based on these findings, a few recommendations were made for educators and publishers to improve the effectiveness of chemistry instruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00207\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球的化学教师都认识到额外练习的价值,并为学生提供工作表,以提高他们的技能和对有限课堂时间内介绍的材料的理解。然而,这些静态作业单存在局限性,因为它们只能让学生接触到有限的问题。因此,采用自适应技术的在线作业系统越来越受欢迎,因为它们能提供更全面的学习体验和有价值的反馈。尽管在线作业系统具有提高理解能力的潜力,但据观察,作业得分并不一定与考试成绩相关。这是因为有些学生缺乏耐心,依赖于提供的解决方案,而不是自己寻找解决方案。这些学生认为,记住解题方法就足以解决考试中的问题。因此,他们失去了培养独立解决问题所需的心理和情感耐力的机会。为了研究每道题在求解前所用时间的影响,91 名普通化学学生被分为三组--最少组、平均组和最多组。结果显示,最短时间组和平均时间组学生同样受益,但最长时间组学生的成绩有所下降。有关干预问题完成率的数据表明,由于每道问题所需的时间较长,精神和情绪疲劳的潜在影响越来越大。基于这些发现,我们向教育工作者和出版商提出了一些建议,以提高化学教学的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analyzing the Impact of Time Spent on Practice Questions on General Chemistry Students’ Problem-Solving Performance

Analyzing the Impact of Time Spent on Practice Questions on General Chemistry Students’ Problem-Solving Performance
Chemistry teachers globally recognize the value of additional practice and offer students worksheets to enhance their skills and comprehension of material introduced in a limited class time. However, these static worksheets have limitations as they expose students to only a limited range of questions. As a result, online homework systems featuring adaptive technology have gained popularity, as they provide a more comprehensive learning experience and valuable feedback. Despite their potential to improve understanding, it has been observed that homework scores do not necessarily correlate with the exam performance. This is attributed to some students being impatient and relying on the provided solutions instead of finding their own. These students believe that memorizing solutions is enough to solve problems included in exams. Therefore, they lose opportunities to develop the necessary mental and emotional endurance required for independent problem-solving. To investigate the impact of time spent on each question before resorting to solutions, 91 general chemistry students were divided into three groups─minimum, average, and maximum─based on the time allotted for solving intervention questions. The results revealed that the minimum and average time groups benefited equally but the performance of the maximum time group declined. The data on completion rates of the intervention questions pointed out the increasing potential impact of mental and emotional fatigue caused by the extended time needed for each question. Based on these findings, a few recommendations were made for educators and publishers to improve the effectiveness of chemistry instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信