Neha Gondra, Sloka Suresh, Auddy Anilao, Stephanie Toy, Sandhya B. Pfile, Brandon J. Vernoy, Josh M. Y. Lee, Rachana Raghavendra, Akshaya Ravi, Ozcan Gulacar
{"title":"分析花在练习题上的时间对普通化学学生解决问题能力的影响","authors":"Neha Gondra, Sloka Suresh, Auddy Anilao, Stephanie Toy, Sandhya B. Pfile, Brandon J. Vernoy, Josh M. Y. Lee, Rachana Raghavendra, Akshaya Ravi, Ozcan Gulacar","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemistry teachers globally recognize the value of additional practice and offer students worksheets to enhance their skills and comprehension of material introduced in a limited class time. However, these static worksheets have limitations as they expose students to only a limited range of questions. As a result, online homework systems featuring adaptive technology have gained popularity, as they provide a more comprehensive learning experience and valuable feedback. Despite their potential to improve understanding, it has been observed that homework scores do not necessarily correlate with the exam performance. This is attributed to some students being impatient and relying on the provided solutions instead of finding their own. These students believe that memorizing solutions is enough to solve problems included in exams. Therefore, they lose opportunities to develop the necessary mental and emotional endurance required for independent problem-solving. To investigate the impact of time spent on each question before resorting to solutions, 91 general chemistry students were divided into three groups─minimum, average, and maximum─based on the time allotted for solving intervention questions. The results revealed that the minimum and average time groups benefited equally but the performance of the maximum time group declined. The data on completion rates of the intervention questions pointed out the increasing potential impact of mental and emotional fatigue caused by the extended time needed for each question. Based on these findings, a few recommendations were made for educators and publishers to improve the effectiveness of chemistry instruction.","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the Impact of Time Spent on Practice Questions on General Chemistry Students’ Problem-Solving Performance\",\"authors\":\"Neha Gondra, Sloka Suresh, Auddy Anilao, Stephanie Toy, Sandhya B. Pfile, Brandon J. Vernoy, Josh M. Y. Lee, Rachana Raghavendra, Akshaya Ravi, Ozcan Gulacar\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chemistry teachers globally recognize the value of additional practice and offer students worksheets to enhance their skills and comprehension of material introduced in a limited class time. However, these static worksheets have limitations as they expose students to only a limited range of questions. As a result, online homework systems featuring adaptive technology have gained popularity, as they provide a more comprehensive learning experience and valuable feedback. Despite their potential to improve understanding, it has been observed that homework scores do not necessarily correlate with the exam performance. This is attributed to some students being impatient and relying on the provided solutions instead of finding their own. These students believe that memorizing solutions is enough to solve problems included in exams. Therefore, they lose opportunities to develop the necessary mental and emotional endurance required for independent problem-solving. To investigate the impact of time spent on each question before resorting to solutions, 91 general chemistry students were divided into three groups─minimum, average, and maximum─based on the time allotted for solving intervention questions. The results revealed that the minimum and average time groups benefited equally but the performance of the maximum time group declined. The data on completion rates of the intervention questions pointed out the increasing potential impact of mental and emotional fatigue caused by the extended time needed for each question. Based on these findings, a few recommendations were made for educators and publishers to improve the effectiveness of chemistry instruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00207\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyzing the Impact of Time Spent on Practice Questions on General Chemistry Students’ Problem-Solving Performance
Chemistry teachers globally recognize the value of additional practice and offer students worksheets to enhance their skills and comprehension of material introduced in a limited class time. However, these static worksheets have limitations as they expose students to only a limited range of questions. As a result, online homework systems featuring adaptive technology have gained popularity, as they provide a more comprehensive learning experience and valuable feedback. Despite their potential to improve understanding, it has been observed that homework scores do not necessarily correlate with the exam performance. This is attributed to some students being impatient and relying on the provided solutions instead of finding their own. These students believe that memorizing solutions is enough to solve problems included in exams. Therefore, they lose opportunities to develop the necessary mental and emotional endurance required for independent problem-solving. To investigate the impact of time spent on each question before resorting to solutions, 91 general chemistry students were divided into three groups─minimum, average, and maximum─based on the time allotted for solving intervention questions. The results revealed that the minimum and average time groups benefited equally but the performance of the maximum time group declined. The data on completion rates of the intervention questions pointed out the increasing potential impact of mental and emotional fatigue caused by the extended time needed for each question. Based on these findings, a few recommendations were made for educators and publishers to improve the effectiveness of chemistry instruction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.