用于分析匹配病例对照研究的随机森林

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Gunther Schauberger, Stefanie J. Klug, Moritz Berger
{"title":"用于分析匹配病例对照研究的随机森林","authors":"Gunther Schauberger, Stefanie J. Klug, Moritz Berger","doi":"10.1186/s12859-024-05877-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conditional logistic regression trees have been proposed as a flexible alternative to the standard method of conditional logistic regression for the analysis of matched case–control studies. While they allow to avoid the strict assumption of linearity and automatically incorporate interactions, conditional logistic regression trees may suffer from a relatively high variability. Further machine learning methods for the analysis of matched case–control studies are missing because conventional machine learning methods cannot handle the matched structure of the data. A random forest method for the analysis of matched case–control studies based on conditional logistic regression trees is proposed, which overcomes the issue of high variability. It provides an accurate estimation of exposure effects while being more flexible in the functional form of covariate effects. The efficacy of the method is illustrated in a simulation study and within an application to real-world data from a matched case–control study on the effect of regular participation in cervical cancer screening on the development of cervical cancer. The proposed random forest method is a promising add-on to the toolbox for the analysis of matched case–control studies and addresses the need for machine-learning methods in this field. It provides a more flexible approach compared to the standard method of conditional logistic regression, but also compared to conditional logistic regression trees. It allows for non-linearity and the automatic inclusion of interaction effects and is suitable both for exploratory and explanatory analyses.","PeriodicalId":8958,"journal":{"name":"BMC Bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Random forests for the analysis of matched case–control studies\",\"authors\":\"Gunther Schauberger, Stefanie J. Klug, Moritz Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12859-024-05877-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conditional logistic regression trees have been proposed as a flexible alternative to the standard method of conditional logistic regression for the analysis of matched case–control studies. While they allow to avoid the strict assumption of linearity and automatically incorporate interactions, conditional logistic regression trees may suffer from a relatively high variability. Further machine learning methods for the analysis of matched case–control studies are missing because conventional machine learning methods cannot handle the matched structure of the data. A random forest method for the analysis of matched case–control studies based on conditional logistic regression trees is proposed, which overcomes the issue of high variability. It provides an accurate estimation of exposure effects while being more flexible in the functional form of covariate effects. The efficacy of the method is illustrated in a simulation study and within an application to real-world data from a matched case–control study on the effect of regular participation in cervical cancer screening on the development of cervical cancer. The proposed random forest method is a promising add-on to the toolbox for the analysis of matched case–control studies and addresses the need for machine-learning methods in this field. It provides a more flexible approach compared to the standard method of conditional logistic regression, but also compared to conditional logistic regression trees. It allows for non-linearity and the automatic inclusion of interaction effects and is suitable both for exploratory and explanatory analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05877-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05877-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

条件 logistic 回归树作为条件 logistic 回归标准方法的一种灵活替代方法,已被提出用于匹配病例对照研究的分析。虽然条件 logistic 回归树可以避免严格的线性假设,并自动纳入交互作用,但可能存在相对较高的变异性。由于传统的机器学习方法无法处理数据的匹配结构,因此缺少用于分析匹配病例对照研究的进一步机器学习方法。本文提出了一种基于条件逻辑回归树的随机森林方法,用于分析匹配的病例对照研究,克服了高变异性的问题。它能准确估计暴露效应,同时在协变量效应的函数形式上更加灵活。在一项模拟研究和一项关于定期参加宫颈癌筛查对宫颈癌发病影响的匹配病例对照研究的实际数据应用中,说明了该方法的有效性。所提出的随机森林方法是分析匹配病例对照研究工具箱中一个很有前途的附加工具,满足了这一领域对机器学习方法的需求。与条件逻辑回归的标准方法相比,它提供了一种更灵活的方法,与条件逻辑回归树相比也是如此。它允许非线性和自动纳入交互效应,既适用于探索性分析,也适用于解释性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Random forests for the analysis of matched case–control studies
Conditional logistic regression trees have been proposed as a flexible alternative to the standard method of conditional logistic regression for the analysis of matched case–control studies. While they allow to avoid the strict assumption of linearity and automatically incorporate interactions, conditional logistic regression trees may suffer from a relatively high variability. Further machine learning methods for the analysis of matched case–control studies are missing because conventional machine learning methods cannot handle the matched structure of the data. A random forest method for the analysis of matched case–control studies based on conditional logistic regression trees is proposed, which overcomes the issue of high variability. It provides an accurate estimation of exposure effects while being more flexible in the functional form of covariate effects. The efficacy of the method is illustrated in a simulation study and within an application to real-world data from a matched case–control study on the effect of regular participation in cervical cancer screening on the development of cervical cancer. The proposed random forest method is a promising add-on to the toolbox for the analysis of matched case–control studies and addresses the need for machine-learning methods in this field. It provides a more flexible approach compared to the standard method of conditional logistic regression, but also compared to conditional logistic regression trees. It allows for non-linearity and the automatic inclusion of interaction effects and is suitable both for exploratory and explanatory analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Bioinformatics
BMC Bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Bioinformatics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the development, testing and novel application of computational and statistical methods for the modeling and analysis of all kinds of biological data, as well as other areas of computational biology. BMC Bioinformatics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信