elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor 对囊性纤维化健康相关生活质量和日常治疗方案决策的影响:一项混合方法探索性研究

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Melissa Basile, Jennifer Polo, Katherine Henthorne, Joan DeCelie-Germana, Susan Galvin, Janice Wang
{"title":"elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor 对囊性纤维化健康相关生活质量和日常治疗方案决策的影响:一项混合方法探索性研究","authors":"Melissa Basile, Jennifer Polo, Katherine Henthorne, Joan DeCelie-Germana, Susan Galvin, Janice Wang","doi":"10.1177/20406223241264477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has reduced many symptoms of cystic fibrosis (CF).Objectives:We sought to identify the impact of ETI on both symptoms and treatment decisions among adults with CF.Design:Participants were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Surveys were sent via a RedCap link. Semistructured interviews were administered remotely via Microsoft Teams. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed.Methods:We assessed Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) subscales for physical, respiratory, emotion, and treatment, and analyzed semistructured interviews covering CF treatment regimens and daily living. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed separately and via a mixed-methods convergence coding matrix.Results:Twenty-four adults with CF taking ETI were included. CFQ-R subscale scores (mean scores/standard deviation) were physical (82.1/22.8), respiratory (83.7/11.2), emotion (65.3/14.2), and treatment (57.5/20.1). Three themes about decision-making for non-ETI-treatments emerged: (1) How I’m feeling, (2) Not noticing a difference, and (3) Uncertainty about long-term impact of modifying treatment regimens, and we found participants weighed each of these factors in their treatment decisions. Key findings from mixed-methods analysis show that among individuals experiencing higher CFQ-R scores for physical and respiratory compared to emotion and treatment, there were statements indicating that while those participants were experiencing better physical health, many continued their burdensome treatment regimens.Conclusion:With little long-term data on the impact of reducing non-ETI treatments, participants weighed how they were feeling, treatment efficacy beliefs, and risk tolerance when making treatment decisions.","PeriodicalId":22960,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on cystic fibrosis health-related quality of life and decision-making about daily treatment regimens: a mixed methods exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Basile, Jennifer Polo, Katherine Henthorne, Joan DeCelie-Germana, Susan Galvin, Janice Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20406223241264477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has reduced many symptoms of cystic fibrosis (CF).Objectives:We sought to identify the impact of ETI on both symptoms and treatment decisions among adults with CF.Design:Participants were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Surveys were sent via a RedCap link. Semistructured interviews were administered remotely via Microsoft Teams. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed.Methods:We assessed Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) subscales for physical, respiratory, emotion, and treatment, and analyzed semistructured interviews covering CF treatment regimens and daily living. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed separately and via a mixed-methods convergence coding matrix.Results:Twenty-four adults with CF taking ETI were included. CFQ-R subscale scores (mean scores/standard deviation) were physical (82.1/22.8), respiratory (83.7/11.2), emotion (65.3/14.2), and treatment (57.5/20.1). Three themes about decision-making for non-ETI-treatments emerged: (1) How I’m feeling, (2) Not noticing a difference, and (3) Uncertainty about long-term impact of modifying treatment regimens, and we found participants weighed each of these factors in their treatment decisions. Key findings from mixed-methods analysis show that among individuals experiencing higher CFQ-R scores for physical and respiratory compared to emotion and treatment, there were statements indicating that while those participants were experiencing better physical health, many continued their burdensome treatment regimens.Conclusion:With little long-term data on the impact of reducing non-ETI treatments, participants weighed how they were feeling, treatment efficacy beliefs, and risk tolerance when making treatment decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223241264477\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223241264477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI)减轻了囊性纤维化(CF)的许多症状。目标:我们试图确定 ETI 对 CF 成人患者的症状和治疗决策的影响。调查问卷通过 RedCap 链接发送。半结构式访谈通过 Microsoft Teams 进行远程管理。方法:我们评估了囊性纤维化问卷-修订版(CFQ-R)中有关身体、呼吸、情绪和治疗的分量表,并分析了涉及 CF 治疗方案和日常生活的半结构式访谈。对定量和定性结果分别进行了分析,并通过混合方法聚合编码矩阵进行了分析。CFQ-R分量表的得分(平均分/标准差)分别为身体(82.1/22.8)、呼吸(83.7/11.2)、情绪(65.3/14.2)和治疗(57.5/20.1)。关于非 ETI 治疗的决策出现了三个主题:(1) 我的感觉;(2) 没有注意到区别;(3) 不确定修改治疗方案的长期影响。混合方法分析的主要结果显示,与情绪和治疗相比,身体和呼吸方面的 CFQ-R 得分较高的人中,有一些陈述表明,虽然这些参与者的身体状况有所改善,但许多人仍在继续他们繁重的治疗方案。结论:由于有关减少非ETI 治疗影响的长期数据很少,参与者在做出治疗决定时会权衡他们的感觉、治疗效果信念和风险承受能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on cystic fibrosis health-related quality of life and decision-making about daily treatment regimens: a mixed methods exploratory study
Background:Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has reduced many symptoms of cystic fibrosis (CF).Objectives:We sought to identify the impact of ETI on both symptoms and treatment decisions among adults with CF.Design:Participants were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Surveys were sent via a RedCap link. Semistructured interviews were administered remotely via Microsoft Teams. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed.Methods:We assessed Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) subscales for physical, respiratory, emotion, and treatment, and analyzed semistructured interviews covering CF treatment regimens and daily living. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed separately and via a mixed-methods convergence coding matrix.Results:Twenty-four adults with CF taking ETI were included. CFQ-R subscale scores (mean scores/standard deviation) were physical (82.1/22.8), respiratory (83.7/11.2), emotion (65.3/14.2), and treatment (57.5/20.1). Three themes about decision-making for non-ETI-treatments emerged: (1) How I’m feeling, (2) Not noticing a difference, and (3) Uncertainty about long-term impact of modifying treatment regimens, and we found participants weighed each of these factors in their treatment decisions. Key findings from mixed-methods analysis show that among individuals experiencing higher CFQ-R scores for physical and respiratory compared to emotion and treatment, there were statements indicating that while those participants were experiencing better physical health, many continued their burdensome treatment regimens.Conclusion:With little long-term data on the impact of reducing non-ETI treatments, participants weighed how they were feeling, treatment efficacy beliefs, and risk tolerance when making treatment decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease publishes the highest quality peer-reviewed research, reviews and scholarly comment in the drug treatment of all chronic diseases. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers involved in the medical treatment of chronic disease, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信