Nicole A. Telfer , Iheoma U. Iruka , Noreen Yazejian , John Sideris , Rachel Kaplan
{"title":"不同种族群体的 ECERS-3 分数含义相同吗?按教师和班级种族进行测量不变性测试","authors":"Nicole A. Telfer , Iheoma U. Iruka , Noreen Yazejian , John Sideris , Rachel Kaplan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of the current study is to use secondary data to examine the extent to which the ECERS-3, specifically the factor structure, is equivalent across Black and Latine/Hispanic teachers, racial and ethnic classroom composition, and race/ethnicity of students. Data were drawn from a large-scale 2015-16 validation study of the ECERS-3 in three states (Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Washington) that were using the ECERS-3 as part of their quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS). Approximately 1,063 classrooms serving children between the ages of 3 and 5 were included in the final sample, and about 69 percent of the teachers identified as White. Findings revealed that the basic factor structure of the ECERS-3 was similar in the sample of classrooms when compared across lead teacher race, classroom racial composition, and lead teacher-child match; however, some differences were found in factor loadings and item thresholds. These findings have implications for ensuring that measures to assess global quality consider differential effects of race of the teacher, child, and classroom composition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 122-130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do ECERS-3 scores mean the same thing across racial groups? Measurement invariance testing by teacher and classroom race\",\"authors\":\"Nicole A. Telfer , Iheoma U. Iruka , Noreen Yazejian , John Sideris , Rachel Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of the current study is to use secondary data to examine the extent to which the ECERS-3, specifically the factor structure, is equivalent across Black and Latine/Hispanic teachers, racial and ethnic classroom composition, and race/ethnicity of students. Data were drawn from a large-scale 2015-16 validation study of the ECERS-3 in three states (Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Washington) that were using the ECERS-3 as part of their quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS). Approximately 1,063 classrooms serving children between the ages of 3 and 5 were included in the final sample, and about 69 percent of the teachers identified as White. Findings revealed that the basic factor structure of the ECERS-3 was similar in the sample of classrooms when compared across lead teacher race, classroom racial composition, and lead teacher-child match; however, some differences were found in factor loadings and item thresholds. These findings have implications for ensuring that measures to assess global quality consider differential effects of race of the teacher, child, and classroom composition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 122-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624001029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624001029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do ECERS-3 scores mean the same thing across racial groups? Measurement invariance testing by teacher and classroom race
The purpose of the current study is to use secondary data to examine the extent to which the ECERS-3, specifically the factor structure, is equivalent across Black and Latine/Hispanic teachers, racial and ethnic classroom composition, and race/ethnicity of students. Data were drawn from a large-scale 2015-16 validation study of the ECERS-3 in three states (Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Washington) that were using the ECERS-3 as part of their quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS). Approximately 1,063 classrooms serving children between the ages of 3 and 5 were included in the final sample, and about 69 percent of the teachers identified as White. Findings revealed that the basic factor structure of the ECERS-3 was similar in the sample of classrooms when compared across lead teacher race, classroom racial composition, and lead teacher-child match; however, some differences were found in factor loadings and item thresholds. These findings have implications for ensuring that measures to assess global quality consider differential effects of race of the teacher, child, and classroom composition.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.