评估全国虚拟护理管理干预的公平性:在患有高血压和糖尿病的退伍军人中按种族/民族分列的交付情况和结果。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Leah M. Marcotte MD, MS, Chelle L. Wheat PhD, MPH, Mayuree Rao MD, MS, Edwin S. Wong PhD, Paul Hebert PhD, Karin Nelson MD, MSHS, Jorge Rojas MS, Eric J. Gunnink MS, Ashok Reddy MD, MS
{"title":"评估全国虚拟护理管理干预的公平性:在患有高血压和糖尿病的退伍军人中按种族/民族分列的交付情况和结果。","authors":"Leah M. Marcotte MD, MS,&nbsp;Chelle L. Wheat PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Mayuree Rao MD, MS,&nbsp;Edwin S. Wong PhD,&nbsp;Paul Hebert PhD,&nbsp;Karin Nelson MD, MSHS,&nbsp;Jorge Rojas MS,&nbsp;Eric J. Gunnink MS,&nbsp;Ashok Reddy MD, MS","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate whether the Preventive Health Inventory (PHI)—a virtual care management intervention addressing hypertension and diabetes management implemented nationally in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)—was delivered equitably among racial/ethnic groups and if existing inequities in hypertension and diabetes outcomes changed following PHI receipt.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\n \n <p>We used data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse among Veterans enrolled in primary care nationally from February 28, 2021 to March 31, 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>We used logistic regression to evaluate PHI receipt and hypertension and diabetes outcomes after PHI implementation among Veterans with hypertension and/or diabetes. We conducted unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusting for clinic fixed effects using dummy variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified Veterans engaged in primary care with documented race/ethnicity and hypertension and/or diabetes diagnoses in all months during the study period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principle Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Prior to PHI, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (42.2%) and Hispanic (39.5%) Veterans were less likely to have controlled hypertension vs. Non-Hispanic White (NHW) Veterans (47.5%); NHB Veterans (32.9%) were more likely to have uncontrolled diabetes vs. NHW Veterans (25.1%). Among 1,805,658 Veterans, 5.7% NHW (<i>N</i> = 68,744), 5.6% NHB (<i>N</i> = 22,580), 10.2% Hispanic (<i>N</i> = 13,313), 6.2% Asian/Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian (<i>N</i> = 1868), 5.1% American Indian/Native Alaskan (<i>N</i> = 744), and 5.6% multiple races or other race (<i>N</i> = 1647) Veterans received PHI. We found no significant racial inequities in PHI receipt in unadjusted and adjusted models. Hypertension and diabetes measures improved more in the intervention group compared with the group who did not receive the intervention. There were no new or worsened inequities after PHI, and in pre-/post-intervention analysis, among NHB Veterans, the inequity in uncontrolled diabetes improved by 1.9 percentage points (95% CI 0.2, 3.6).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest the PHI intervention was equitably deployed across race/ethnicity groups without significantly impacting most existing inequities in diabetes and hypertension.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating equity in a national virtual care management intervention: Delivery and outcomes by race/ethnicity among Veterans with hypertension and diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Leah M. Marcotte MD, MS,&nbsp;Chelle L. Wheat PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Mayuree Rao MD, MS,&nbsp;Edwin S. Wong PhD,&nbsp;Paul Hebert PhD,&nbsp;Karin Nelson MD, MSHS,&nbsp;Jorge Rojas MS,&nbsp;Eric J. Gunnink MS,&nbsp;Ashok Reddy MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate whether the Preventive Health Inventory (PHI)—a virtual care management intervention addressing hypertension and diabetes management implemented nationally in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)—was delivered equitably among racial/ethnic groups and if existing inequities in hypertension and diabetes outcomes changed following PHI receipt.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse among Veterans enrolled in primary care nationally from February 28, 2021 to March 31, 2022.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used logistic regression to evaluate PHI receipt and hypertension and diabetes outcomes after PHI implementation among Veterans with hypertension and/or diabetes. We conducted unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusting for clinic fixed effects using dummy variables.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified Veterans engaged in primary care with documented race/ethnicity and hypertension and/or diabetes diagnoses in all months during the study period.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Principle Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prior to PHI, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (42.2%) and Hispanic (39.5%) Veterans were less likely to have controlled hypertension vs. Non-Hispanic White (NHW) Veterans (47.5%); NHB Veterans (32.9%) were more likely to have uncontrolled diabetes vs. NHW Veterans (25.1%). Among 1,805,658 Veterans, 5.7% NHW (<i>N</i> = 68,744), 5.6% NHB (<i>N</i> = 22,580), 10.2% Hispanic (<i>N</i> = 13,313), 6.2% Asian/Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian (<i>N</i> = 1868), 5.1% American Indian/Native Alaskan (<i>N</i> = 744), and 5.6% multiple races or other race (<i>N</i> = 1647) Veterans received PHI. We found no significant racial inequities in PHI receipt in unadjusted and adjusted models. Hypertension and diabetes measures improved more in the intervention group compared with the group who did not receive the intervention. There were no new or worsened inequities after PHI, and in pre-/post-intervention analysis, among NHB Veterans, the inequity in uncontrolled diabetes improved by 1.9 percentage points (95% CI 0.2, 3.6).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings suggest the PHI intervention was equitably deployed across race/ethnicity groups without significantly impacting most existing inequities in diabetes and hypertension.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14352\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的目的:评估预防性健康清单(PHI)--退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)在全国范围内实施的针对高血压和糖尿病管理的虚拟护理管理干预措施--是否在种族/民族群体中公平实施,以及在接受 PHI 后,高血压和糖尿病结果中现有的不平等是否有所改变:我们使用了 VHA 企业数据仓库中 2021 年 2 月 28 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日期间在全国范围内接受初级保健的退伍军人的数据:我们使用逻辑回归评估了高血压和/或糖尿病退伍军人在 PHI 实施后接受 PHI 的情况以及高血压和糖尿病的治疗效果。我们进行了未调整分析,并使用虚拟变量对诊所固定效应进行了调整分析:我们确定了在研究期间所有月份接受初级保健并记录了种族/民族和高血压和/或糖尿病诊断的退伍军人:在 PHI 之前,非西班牙裔黑人 (NHB) 退伍军人 (42.2%) 和西班牙裔退伍军人 (39.5%) 的高血压得到控制的可能性低于非西班牙裔白人退伍军人 (47.5%);非西班牙裔黑人退伍军人 (32.9%) 的糖尿病未得到控制的可能性高于非西班牙裔白人退伍军人 (25.1%)。在 1,805,658 名退伍军人中,5.7% 的 NHW 退伍军人(N = 68,744 人)、5.6% 的 NHB 退伍军人(N = 22,580 人)、10.2% 的西班牙裔退伍军人(N = 13,313 人)、6.2% 的亚洲/太平洋岛民/夏威夷原住民(N = 1868 人)、5.1% 的美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(N = 744 人)和 5.6% 的多种族或其他种族退伍军人(N = 1647 人)获得了 PHI。在未调整和调整后的模型中,我们没有发现在接受 PHI 方面存在明显的种族不平等。干预组与未接受干预组相比,高血压和糖尿病指标的改善幅度更大。在 PHI 后,没有出现新的或恶化的不公平现象,在干预前后分析中,在 NHB 退伍军人中,未控制糖尿病的不公平现象改善了 1.9 个百分点(95% CI 0.2,3.6):我们的研究结果表明,PHI 干预措施在不同种族/族裔群体中的应用是公平的,并没有对大多数现有的糖尿病和高血压不公平现象产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating equity in a national virtual care management intervention: Delivery and outcomes by race/ethnicity among Veterans with hypertension and diabetes

Objective

To evaluate whether the Preventive Health Inventory (PHI)—a virtual care management intervention addressing hypertension and diabetes management implemented nationally in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)—was delivered equitably among racial/ethnic groups and if existing inequities in hypertension and diabetes outcomes changed following PHI receipt.

Data Sources and Study Setting

We used data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse among Veterans enrolled in primary care nationally from February 28, 2021 to March 31, 2022.

Study Design

We used logistic regression to evaluate PHI receipt and hypertension and diabetes outcomes after PHI implementation among Veterans with hypertension and/or diabetes. We conducted unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusting for clinic fixed effects using dummy variables.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

We identified Veterans engaged in primary care with documented race/ethnicity and hypertension and/or diabetes diagnoses in all months during the study period.

Principle Findings

Prior to PHI, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (42.2%) and Hispanic (39.5%) Veterans were less likely to have controlled hypertension vs. Non-Hispanic White (NHW) Veterans (47.5%); NHB Veterans (32.9%) were more likely to have uncontrolled diabetes vs. NHW Veterans (25.1%). Among 1,805,658 Veterans, 5.7% NHW (N = 68,744), 5.6% NHB (N = 22,580), 10.2% Hispanic (N = 13,313), 6.2% Asian/Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian (N = 1868), 5.1% American Indian/Native Alaskan (N = 744), and 5.6% multiple races or other race (N = 1647) Veterans received PHI. We found no significant racial inequities in PHI receipt in unadjusted and adjusted models. Hypertension and diabetes measures improved more in the intervention group compared with the group who did not receive the intervention. There were no new or worsened inequities after PHI, and in pre-/post-intervention analysis, among NHB Veterans, the inequity in uncontrolled diabetes improved by 1.9 percentage points (95% CI 0.2, 3.6).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest the PHI intervention was equitably deployed across race/ethnicity groups without significantly impacting most existing inequities in diabetes and hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信