尽量减少竞争偏差后的质子泵抑制剂痴呆症信号:最新比例失调分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2387314
Bin Wu, Min Xiao, Fengbo Wu, Ting Xu
{"title":"尽量减少竞争偏差后的质子泵抑制剂痴呆症信号:最新比例失调分析。","authors":"Bin Wu, Min Xiao, Fengbo Wu, Ting Xu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2387314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and dementia was controversial. The aim of the current study was to perform an updated pharmacovigilance analysis of the association between dementia event and PPI treatment after minimizing competition bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We gathered cases reported with PPI treatment based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database from 2004 to 2023. We employed disproportionality algorithms, including reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC), to detect the association between dementia event and PPI. We investigated the affection of event competition bias on the current disproportionality signal detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We finally included a total of 776,191 PPI cases, and 1813 cases in the dementia group. Analyzing primary suspect PPIs, we detected a significant association between dementia and PPI (ROR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.22 to 1.56; IC = 0.46, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.86). After excluding the PPI case with renal injury events, the strength of the dementia signal increased. Omeprazole (589 cases), pantoprazole (514 cases), and esomeprazole (386 cases) were the top three PPI reported with dementia events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current pharmacovigilance study identified a significant association between dementia and PPIs, except vonoprazan and tegoprazan, especially taking competition bias into account. Further high-quality prospective study still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"969-976"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signal of dementia with proton pump inhibitor after minimizing competition bias: an updated disproportionality analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bin Wu, Min Xiao, Fengbo Wu, Ting Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2387314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and dementia was controversial. The aim of the current study was to perform an updated pharmacovigilance analysis of the association between dementia event and PPI treatment after minimizing competition bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We gathered cases reported with PPI treatment based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database from 2004 to 2023. We employed disproportionality algorithms, including reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC), to detect the association between dementia event and PPI. We investigated the affection of event competition bias on the current disproportionality signal detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We finally included a total of 776,191 PPI cases, and 1813 cases in the dementia group. Analyzing primary suspect PPIs, we detected a significant association between dementia and PPI (ROR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.22 to 1.56; IC = 0.46, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.86). After excluding the PPI case with renal injury events, the strength of the dementia signal increased. Omeprazole (589 cases), pantoprazole (514 cases), and esomeprazole (386 cases) were the top three PPI reported with dementia events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current pharmacovigilance study identified a significant association between dementia and PPIs, except vonoprazan and tegoprazan, especially taking competition bias into account. Further high-quality prospective study still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"969-976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2387314\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2387314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与痴呆之间的关系存在争议。本研究的目的是在尽量减少竞争偏倚的情况下,对痴呆事件与 PPI 治疗之间的关联进行最新的药物警戒分析:方法:我们根据美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库,收集了 2004 年至 2023 年期间报告的 PPI 治疗病例。我们采用了比例失调算法(包括报告几率比(ROR)和信息成分(IC))来检测痴呆事件与 PPI 之间的关联。我们研究了事件竞争偏差对当前比例失调信号检测的影响:我们最终共纳入了 776 191 例 PPI,其中痴呆组有 1813 例。通过分析主要可疑PPI,我们发现痴呆与PPI之间存在显著关联(ROR = 1.38,95%CI 1.22至1.56;IC = 0.46,95%CI 0.04至0.86)。在排除了有肾损伤事件的 PPI 病例后,痴呆信号的强度有所增加。奥美拉唑(589例)、泮托拉唑(514例)和埃索美拉唑(386例)是发生痴呆事件的前三位PPI:目前的药物警戒研究发现,除冯诺普拉唑和替戈普拉唑外,痴呆症与 PPIs 有显著关联,特别是考虑到竞争偏倚。仍需进一步开展高质量的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Signal of dementia with proton pump inhibitor after minimizing competition bias: an updated disproportionality analysis.

Objective: The association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and dementia was controversial. The aim of the current study was to perform an updated pharmacovigilance analysis of the association between dementia event and PPI treatment after minimizing competition bias.

Methods: We gathered cases reported with PPI treatment based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database from 2004 to 2023. We employed disproportionality algorithms, including reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC), to detect the association between dementia event and PPI. We investigated the affection of event competition bias on the current disproportionality signal detection.

Results: We finally included a total of 776,191 PPI cases, and 1813 cases in the dementia group. Analyzing primary suspect PPIs, we detected a significant association between dementia and PPI (ROR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.22 to 1.56; IC = 0.46, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.86). After excluding the PPI case with renal injury events, the strength of the dementia signal increased. Omeprazole (589 cases), pantoprazole (514 cases), and esomeprazole (386 cases) were the top three PPI reported with dementia events.

Conclusion: The current pharmacovigilance study identified a significant association between dementia and PPIs, except vonoprazan and tegoprazan, especially taking competition bias into account. Further high-quality prospective study still needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信