一项随机试验,比较了早期乳腺癌患者 6 个月一次唑来膦酸盐辅助治疗与一次性单剂量治疗的效果。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07443-2
Arif Ali Awan, Carol Stober, Gregory R Pond, Igor Machado, Lucas Clemons, Henry Conter, Demetrios Simos, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Mihaela Mates, Vikaash Kumar, John Hilton, Marie-France Savard, Dean Fergusson, Lisa Vandermeer, Mark Clemons
{"title":"一项随机试验,比较了早期乳腺癌患者 6 个月一次唑来膦酸盐辅助治疗与一次性单剂量治疗的效果。","authors":"Arif Ali Awan, Carol Stober, Gregory R Pond, Igor Machado, Lucas Clemons, Henry Conter, Demetrios Simos, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Mihaela Mates, Vikaash Kumar, John Hilton, Marie-France Savard, Dean Fergusson, Lisa Vandermeer, Mark Clemons","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07443-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While adjuvant bisphosphonate use in early breast cancer (EBC) is associated with improvements in breast cancer-specific outcomes, questions remain around optimal bisphosphonate type, dose and scheduling. We evaluated a single zoledronate infusion in a prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Postmenopausal patients with EBC were randomised to receive a single infusion of zoledronate (4 mg IV) or 6-monthly treatment for 3 years. Outcomes measured were; Quality of Life (QoL; EQ-5D-5L), bisphosphonate-related toxicities, including acute phase reactions (APRs), recurrence-free survival (RFS), bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>211 patients were randomized to either a single infusion (n = 107) or six-monthly treatment (n = 104). After 3 years of follow up there were no significant differences between the arms for QoL and most toxicity endpoints. APRs following zoledronate occurred in 81% (171/211) of patients (77.6% in single infusion arm and 84.6% in the 6-monthly group). While the frequency of APRs decreased over 3 years in the 6-monthly arm, they still remain common. Of 34/104 (32.7%) patients who discontinued zoledronate early in the 6-monthly treatment group, the most common reason was APRs (16/34, 47%). At the 3 year follow up, there were no differences between arms for RFS, BMFS or OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single infusion of zoledronate was associated with increased patient convenience, less toxicity, and lower rates of treatment discontinuation. Despite the common clinical impression that APRs decrease with time, this was not observed when patients were specifically questioned. While the study is not powered for non-inferiority, longer-term follow-up for confirmation of RFS and OS rates is ongoing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomised trial comparing 6-monthly adjuvant zoledronate with a single one-time dose in patients with early breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Arif Ali Awan, Carol Stober, Gregory R Pond, Igor Machado, Lucas Clemons, Henry Conter, Demetrios Simos, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Mihaela Mates, Vikaash Kumar, John Hilton, Marie-France Savard, Dean Fergusson, Lisa Vandermeer, Mark Clemons\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-024-07443-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While adjuvant bisphosphonate use in early breast cancer (EBC) is associated with improvements in breast cancer-specific outcomes, questions remain around optimal bisphosphonate type, dose and scheduling. We evaluated a single zoledronate infusion in a prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Postmenopausal patients with EBC were randomised to receive a single infusion of zoledronate (4 mg IV) or 6-monthly treatment for 3 years. Outcomes measured were; Quality of Life (QoL; EQ-5D-5L), bisphosphonate-related toxicities, including acute phase reactions (APRs), recurrence-free survival (RFS), bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>211 patients were randomized to either a single infusion (n = 107) or six-monthly treatment (n = 104). After 3 years of follow up there were no significant differences between the arms for QoL and most toxicity endpoints. APRs following zoledronate occurred in 81% (171/211) of patients (77.6% in single infusion arm and 84.6% in the 6-monthly group). While the frequency of APRs decreased over 3 years in the 6-monthly arm, they still remain common. Of 34/104 (32.7%) patients who discontinued zoledronate early in the 6-monthly treatment group, the most common reason was APRs (16/34, 47%). At the 3 year follow up, there were no differences between arms for RFS, BMFS or OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single infusion of zoledronate was associated with increased patient convenience, less toxicity, and lower rates of treatment discontinuation. Despite the common clinical impression that APRs decrease with time, this was not observed when patients were specifically questioned. While the study is not powered for non-inferiority, longer-term follow-up for confirmation of RFS and OS rates is ongoing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522049/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07443-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07443-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然早期乳腺癌(EBC)辅助使用双膦酸盐可改善乳腺癌特异性预后,但最佳的双膦酸盐类型、剂量和时间安排仍存在问题。我们在一项前瞻性随机试验中对单次唑来膦酸盐输注进行了评估:绝经后 EBC 患者被随机分配接受一次唑来膦酸盐输注(4 毫克静脉注射)或 6 个月一次的治疗,为期 3 年。测量结果包括:生活质量(QoL;EQ-5D-5L)、双膦酸盐相关毒性(包括急性期反应(APR))、无复发生存率(RFS)、无骨转移生存率(BMFS)和总生存率(OS)。经过3年的随访,两组患者在生活质量和大多数毒性终点方面无明显差异。81%的患者(171/211)在接受唑来膦酸钠治疗后出现APR(单次输注组为77.6%,6个月治疗组为84.6%)。虽然在 6 个月组中,APR 的发生率在 3 年内有所下降,但仍很常见。在 6 个月治疗组中,34/104(32.7%)名患者提前停用唑来膦酸钠,其中最常见的原因是 APR(16/34,47%)。在3年的随访中,各组在RFS、BMFS或OS方面没有差异:结论:单次输注唑来膦酸钠可为患者提供更多便利,减少毒性,降低治疗中断率。尽管临床上普遍认为APR会随着时间的推移而降低,但在对患者进行专门询问时并未发现这一现象。虽然该研究没有进行非劣效性研究,但目前正在进行长期随访,以确认RFS和OS率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A randomised trial comparing 6-monthly adjuvant zoledronate with a single one-time dose in patients with early breast cancer.

A randomised trial comparing 6-monthly adjuvant zoledronate with a single one-time dose in patients with early breast cancer.

Purpose: While adjuvant bisphosphonate use in early breast cancer (EBC) is associated with improvements in breast cancer-specific outcomes, questions remain around optimal bisphosphonate type, dose and scheduling. We evaluated a single zoledronate infusion in a prospective randomised trial.

Methods: Postmenopausal patients with EBC were randomised to receive a single infusion of zoledronate (4 mg IV) or 6-monthly treatment for 3 years. Outcomes measured were; Quality of Life (QoL; EQ-5D-5L), bisphosphonate-related toxicities, including acute phase reactions (APRs), recurrence-free survival (RFS), bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: 211 patients were randomized to either a single infusion (n = 107) or six-monthly treatment (n = 104). After 3 years of follow up there were no significant differences between the arms for QoL and most toxicity endpoints. APRs following zoledronate occurred in 81% (171/211) of patients (77.6% in single infusion arm and 84.6% in the 6-monthly group). While the frequency of APRs decreased over 3 years in the 6-monthly arm, they still remain common. Of 34/104 (32.7%) patients who discontinued zoledronate early in the 6-monthly treatment group, the most common reason was APRs (16/34, 47%). At the 3 year follow up, there were no differences between arms for RFS, BMFS or OS.

Conclusion: A single infusion of zoledronate was associated with increased patient convenience, less toxicity, and lower rates of treatment discontinuation. Despite the common clinical impression that APRs decrease with time, this was not observed when patients were specifically questioned. While the study is not powered for non-inferiority, longer-term follow-up for confirmation of RFS and OS rates is ongoing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信