低血压创伤患者的早期血管加压需求:弊大于利吗?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1177/00031348241269425
Tanya Anand, Omar Hejazi, Adam Nelson, Ben Litmanovich, Audrey L Spencer, Muhammad Haris Khurshid, Arshin Ghaedi, Hamidreza Hosseinpour, Louis J Magnotti, Bellal Joseph
{"title":"低血压创伤患者的早期血管加压需求:弊大于利吗?","authors":"Tanya Anand, Omar Hejazi, Adam Nelson, Ben Litmanovich, Audrey L Spencer, Muhammad Haris Khurshid, Arshin Ghaedi, Hamidreza Hosseinpour, Louis J Magnotti, Bellal Joseph","doi":"10.1177/00031348241269425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal utilization of vasopressors during early post-injury resuscitation remains unclear. Our study aims to describe the relationship between the timing of vasopressor administration and outcomes among hypotensive trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of the 2017-2018 ACS-TQIP database. We included adult (≥18 years) trauma patients presenting with hypotension (lowest SBP <90 mmHg) who received vasopressors within 6 hours of admission. We excluded patients who had a severe head injury (Head-AIS >3) and those with spinal cord injury (Spine-AIS >3). Patients were stratified based on the time to receive vasopressors. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the independent association between timing of vasopressor initiation and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1049 patients were identified. Mean age was 55 ± 20 years, and 70% of patients were male. The median ISS was 16 [9-24], 80% had a blunt injury, and the mean SBP was 61 ± 24 mmHg. The median time to first vasopressor administration was 319 [68-352] minutes. Overall, 24-hour and in-hospital mortality rates were 19% and 33%, respectively. Every one-hour delay in vasopressor administration beyond the first hour was independently associated with decreased odds of 24-hour mortality (aOR: 0.65, <i>P</i> < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.65, <i>P</i> < 0.001), major complications (aOR: 0.77, <i>P</i> = 0.003), and increased odds of longer ICU LOS (β + 2.53, <i>P</i> = 0.012). There were no associations between the timing of early vasopressor administration and 24-hour PRBC transfusion requirements (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Earlier vasopressor requirement among hypotensive trauma patients was independently associated with increased mortality and major complications. Further research on the utility and optimal timing of vasopressors during the post-injury resuscitative period is warranted.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III therapeutic/care management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Vasopressor Requirement Among Hypotensive Trauma Patients: Does It Cause More Harm Than Good?\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Anand, Omar Hejazi, Adam Nelson, Ben Litmanovich, Audrey L Spencer, Muhammad Haris Khurshid, Arshin Ghaedi, Hamidreza Hosseinpour, Louis J Magnotti, Bellal Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348241269425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal utilization of vasopressors during early post-injury resuscitation remains unclear. Our study aims to describe the relationship between the timing of vasopressor administration and outcomes among hypotensive trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of the 2017-2018 ACS-TQIP database. We included adult (≥18 years) trauma patients presenting with hypotension (lowest SBP <90 mmHg) who received vasopressors within 6 hours of admission. We excluded patients who had a severe head injury (Head-AIS >3) and those with spinal cord injury (Spine-AIS >3). Patients were stratified based on the time to receive vasopressors. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the independent association between timing of vasopressor initiation and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1049 patients were identified. Mean age was 55 ± 20 years, and 70% of patients were male. The median ISS was 16 [9-24], 80% had a blunt injury, and the mean SBP was 61 ± 24 mmHg. The median time to first vasopressor administration was 319 [68-352] minutes. Overall, 24-hour and in-hospital mortality rates were 19% and 33%, respectively. Every one-hour delay in vasopressor administration beyond the first hour was independently associated with decreased odds of 24-hour mortality (aOR: 0.65, <i>P</i> < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.65, <i>P</i> < 0.001), major complications (aOR: 0.77, <i>P</i> = 0.003), and increased odds of longer ICU LOS (β + 2.53, <i>P</i> = 0.012). There were no associations between the timing of early vasopressor administration and 24-hour PRBC transfusion requirements (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Earlier vasopressor requirement among hypotensive trauma patients was independently associated with increased mortality and major complications. Further research on the utility and optimal timing of vasopressors during the post-injury resuscitative period is warranted.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III therapeutic/care management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"22-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241269425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241269425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伤后早期复苏期间血管加压剂的最佳使用方法仍不明确。我们的研究旨在描述低血压创伤患者使用血管加压素的时机与预后之间的关系:这是对 2017-2018 年 ACS-TQIP 数据库的回顾性分析。我们纳入了出现低血压(最低 SBP 3)和脊髓损伤(Spine-AIS >3)的成年(≥18 岁)创伤患者。根据接受血管加压药的时间对患者进行分层。进行了多变量回归分析,以确定开始使用血管加压药的时间与结果之间的独立关联:结果:共确定了 1049 名患者。平均年龄为 55 ± 20 岁,70% 的患者为男性。ISS中位数为16[9-24],80%为钝性损伤,平均SBP为61 ± 24 mmHg。首次使用血管加压素的中位时间为 319 [68-352] 分钟。总体而言,24小时死亡率和住院死亡率分别为19%和33%。血管加压给药时间每延迟一小时,24小时死亡率(aOR:0.65,P<0.001)、院内死亡率(aOR:0.65,P<0.001)、主要并发症(aOR:0.77,P=0.003)就会降低,ICU LOS时间延长的几率也会增加(β+2.53,P=0.012)。早期使用血管加压素的时间与 24 小时 PRBC 输血需求之间没有关联(P > 0.05):结论:低血压创伤患者过早使用血管加压药与死亡率和主要并发症的增加有独立关联。结论:低血压创伤患者过早使用血管加压药与死亡率和主要并发症的增加密切相关,因此有必要进一步研究在伤后复苏期间使用血管加压药的效用和最佳时机:III 治疗/护理管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Vasopressor Requirement Among Hypotensive Trauma Patients: Does It Cause More Harm Than Good?

Background: Optimal utilization of vasopressors during early post-injury resuscitation remains unclear. Our study aims to describe the relationship between the timing of vasopressor administration and outcomes among hypotensive trauma patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the 2017-2018 ACS-TQIP database. We included adult (≥18 years) trauma patients presenting with hypotension (lowest SBP <90 mmHg) who received vasopressors within 6 hours of admission. We excluded patients who had a severe head injury (Head-AIS >3) and those with spinal cord injury (Spine-AIS >3). Patients were stratified based on the time to receive vasopressors. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the independent association between timing of vasopressor initiation and outcomes.

Results: 1049 patients were identified. Mean age was 55 ± 20 years, and 70% of patients were male. The median ISS was 16 [9-24], 80% had a blunt injury, and the mean SBP was 61 ± 24 mmHg. The median time to first vasopressor administration was 319 [68-352] minutes. Overall, 24-hour and in-hospital mortality rates were 19% and 33%, respectively. Every one-hour delay in vasopressor administration beyond the first hour was independently associated with decreased odds of 24-hour mortality (aOR: 0.65, P < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.65, P < 0.001), major complications (aOR: 0.77, P = 0.003), and increased odds of longer ICU LOS (β + 2.53, P = 0.012). There were no associations between the timing of early vasopressor administration and 24-hour PRBC transfusion requirements (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Earlier vasopressor requirement among hypotensive trauma patients was independently associated with increased mortality and major complications. Further research on the utility and optimal timing of vasopressors during the post-injury resuscitative period is warranted.

Level of evidence: III therapeutic/care management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信