通过纳入更多区域,改进多发性硬化症空间播散的标准。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael A. Foster, Giuseppe Pontillo, Indran Davagnanam, Sara Collorone, Ferran Prados, Baris Kanber, Marios C. Yiannakas, Lola Ogunbowale, Ailbhe Burke, Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, Olga Ciccarelli, Wallace Brownlee, Frederik Barkhof, Ahmed T. Toosy
{"title":"通过纳入更多区域,改进多发性硬化症空间播散的标准。","authors":"Michael A. Foster,&nbsp;Giuseppe Pontillo,&nbsp;Indran Davagnanam,&nbsp;Sara Collorone,&nbsp;Ferran Prados,&nbsp;Baris Kanber,&nbsp;Marios C. Yiannakas,&nbsp;Lola Ogunbowale,&nbsp;Ailbhe Burke,&nbsp;Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott,&nbsp;Olga Ciccarelli,&nbsp;Wallace Brownlee,&nbsp;Frederik Barkhof,&nbsp;Ahmed T. Toosy","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated the effects of adding regions to current dissemination in space (DIS) criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants underwent brain, optic nerve, and spinal cord MRI. Baseline DIS was assessed by 2017 McDonald criteria and versions including optic nerve, temporal lobe, or corpus callosum as a fifth region (requiring 2/5), a version with all regions (requiring 3/7) and optic nerve variations requiring 3/5 and 4/5 regions. Performance was evaluated against MS diagnosis (2017 McDonald criteria) during follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-four participants were recruited (53F, 32.8 ± 7.1 years). 2017 McDonald DIS criteria were 87% sensitive (95% CI: 76–94), 73% specific (50–89), and 83% accurate (74–91) in identifying MS. Modified criteria with optic nerve improved sensitivity to 98% (91–100), with specificity 33% (13–59) and accuracy 84% (74–91). Criteria including temporal lobe showed sensitivity 94% (84–98), specificity 50% (28–72), and accuracy 82% (72–90); criteria including corpus callosum showed sensitivity 90% (80–96), specificity 68% (45–86), and accuracy 85% (75–91). Criteria adding all three regions (3/7 required) had sensitivity 95% (87–99), specificity 55% (32–76), and accuracy 85% (75–91). When requiring 3/5 regions (optic nerve as the fifth), sensitivity was 82% (70–91), specificity 77% (55–92), and accuracy 81% (71–89); with 4/5 regions, sensitivity was 56% (43–69), specificity 95% (77–100), and accuracy 67% (56–77).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>Optic nerve inclusion increased sensitivity while lowering specificity. Increasing required regions in optic nerve criteria increased specificity and decreased sensitivity. Results suggest considering the optic nerve for DIS. An option of 3/5 or 4/5 regions preserved specificity, and criteria adding all three regions had highest accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"11 10","pages":"2572-2582"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52170","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving criteria for dissemination in space in multiple sclerosis by including additional regions\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Foster,&nbsp;Giuseppe Pontillo,&nbsp;Indran Davagnanam,&nbsp;Sara Collorone,&nbsp;Ferran Prados,&nbsp;Baris Kanber,&nbsp;Marios C. Yiannakas,&nbsp;Lola Ogunbowale,&nbsp;Ailbhe Burke,&nbsp;Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott,&nbsp;Olga Ciccarelli,&nbsp;Wallace Brownlee,&nbsp;Frederik Barkhof,&nbsp;Ahmed T. Toosy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.52170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We investigated the effects of adding regions to current dissemination in space (DIS) criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants underwent brain, optic nerve, and spinal cord MRI. Baseline DIS was assessed by 2017 McDonald criteria and versions including optic nerve, temporal lobe, or corpus callosum as a fifth region (requiring 2/5), a version with all regions (requiring 3/7) and optic nerve variations requiring 3/5 and 4/5 regions. Performance was evaluated against MS diagnosis (2017 McDonald criteria) during follow-up.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighty-four participants were recruited (53F, 32.8 ± 7.1 years). 2017 McDonald DIS criteria were 87% sensitive (95% CI: 76–94), 73% specific (50–89), and 83% accurate (74–91) in identifying MS. Modified criteria with optic nerve improved sensitivity to 98% (91–100), with specificity 33% (13–59) and accuracy 84% (74–91). Criteria including temporal lobe showed sensitivity 94% (84–98), specificity 50% (28–72), and accuracy 82% (72–90); criteria including corpus callosum showed sensitivity 90% (80–96), specificity 68% (45–86), and accuracy 85% (75–91). Criteria adding all three regions (3/7 required) had sensitivity 95% (87–99), specificity 55% (32–76), and accuracy 85% (75–91). When requiring 3/5 regions (optic nerve as the fifth), sensitivity was 82% (70–91), specificity 77% (55–92), and accuracy 81% (71–89); with 4/5 regions, sensitivity was 56% (43–69), specificity 95% (77–100), and accuracy 67% (56–77).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Optic nerve inclusion increased sensitivity while lowering specificity. Increasing required regions in optic nerve criteria increased specificity and decreased sensitivity. Results suggest considering the optic nerve for DIS. An option of 3/5 or 4/5 regions preserved specificity, and criteria adding all three regions had highest accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"2572-2582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52170\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52170\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们研究了在目前多发性硬化症(MS)的空间播散(DIS)标准中增加区域的影响:参与者接受脑、视神经和脊髓 MRI 检查。根据 2017 年麦克唐纳标准和包括视神经、颞叶或胼胝体作为第五个区域(要求 2/5)的版本、包含所有区域(要求 3/7)的版本以及要求 3/5 和 4/5 区域的视神经变异版本对基线 DIS 进行评估。在随访过程中,根据多发性硬化症诊断(2017 年麦克唐纳标准)对结果进行了评估:共招募了 84 名参与者(53 名女性,32.8 ± 7.1 岁)。2017 年麦克唐纳 DIS 标准在识别 MS 方面的敏感度为 87%(95% CI:76-94),特异度为 73%(50-89),准确度为 83%(74-91)。包含视神经的修改标准将敏感性提高到 98% (91-100),特异性为 33% (13-59),准确性为 84% (74-91)。包括颞叶的标准显示灵敏度为 94% (84-98),特异性为 50% (28-72),准确率为 82% (72-90);包括胼胝体的标准显示灵敏度为 90% (80-96),特异性为 68% (45-86),准确率为 85% (75-91)。加入所有三个区域(要求 3/7)的标准灵敏度为 95% (87-99),特异性为 55% (32-76),准确率为 85% (75-91)。要求 3/5 个区域(视神经为第五个区域)时,灵敏度为 82% (70-91),特异性为 77% (55-92),准确率为 81% (71-89);要求 4/5 个区域时,灵敏度为 56% (43-69),特异性为 95% (77-100),准确率为 67% (56-77):视神经的加入提高了灵敏度,同时降低了特异性。视神经标准中所需区域的增加提高了特异性,降低了敏感性。结果表明,DIS应考虑视神经。3/5或4/5个区域的选择保留了特异性,增加所有三个区域的标准具有最高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving criteria for dissemination in space in multiple sclerosis by including additional regions

Improving criteria for dissemination in space in multiple sclerosis by including additional regions

Objective

We investigated the effects of adding regions to current dissemination in space (DIS) criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

Participants underwent brain, optic nerve, and spinal cord MRI. Baseline DIS was assessed by 2017 McDonald criteria and versions including optic nerve, temporal lobe, or corpus callosum as a fifth region (requiring 2/5), a version with all regions (requiring 3/7) and optic nerve variations requiring 3/5 and 4/5 regions. Performance was evaluated against MS diagnosis (2017 McDonald criteria) during follow-up.

Results

Eighty-four participants were recruited (53F, 32.8 ± 7.1 years). 2017 McDonald DIS criteria were 87% sensitive (95% CI: 76–94), 73% specific (50–89), and 83% accurate (74–91) in identifying MS. Modified criteria with optic nerve improved sensitivity to 98% (91–100), with specificity 33% (13–59) and accuracy 84% (74–91). Criteria including temporal lobe showed sensitivity 94% (84–98), specificity 50% (28–72), and accuracy 82% (72–90); criteria including corpus callosum showed sensitivity 90% (80–96), specificity 68% (45–86), and accuracy 85% (75–91). Criteria adding all three regions (3/7 required) had sensitivity 95% (87–99), specificity 55% (32–76), and accuracy 85% (75–91). When requiring 3/5 regions (optic nerve as the fifth), sensitivity was 82% (70–91), specificity 77% (55–92), and accuracy 81% (71–89); with 4/5 regions, sensitivity was 56% (43–69), specificity 95% (77–100), and accuracy 67% (56–77).

Interpretation

Optic nerve inclusion increased sensitivity while lowering specificity. Increasing required regions in optic nerve criteria increased specificity and decreased sensitivity. Results suggest considering the optic nerve for DIS. An option of 3/5 or 4/5 regions preserved specificity, and criteria adding all three regions had highest accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信