多项式时间计算的柯尔莫哥洛夫复杂性和非确定性与确定性比较

IF 0.9 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
{"title":"多项式时间计算的柯尔莫哥洛夫复杂性和非确定性与确定性比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2024.114747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We call any consistent and sufficiently powerful formal theory that enables to algorithmically verify whether a text is a proof <strong>algorithmically verifiable mathematics</strong> (av-mathematics). We study the fundamental question whether nondeterminism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial time computations in the framework of av-mathematics.</p><p>Our goal is to show strong indications that nondeterminism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial time computations. To do that, we do not consider decision problems only, but also compression algorithms. We show that at least one of the following three claims must be true:</p><ul><li><span>(i)</span><span><p><figure><img></figure></p></span></li><li><span>(ii)</span><span><p>non-determinism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial-time compression</p></span></li><li><span>(iii)</span><span><p>for each polynomial-time compression algorithm there exists another one of the same asymptotic time complexity that compresses infinitely many strings logarithmically stronger</p></span></li></ul><p>Another surprising consequence of P = NP would be that time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity for any polynomial bound can be computed by deterministic algorithms in polynomial time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49438,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397524003645/pdfft?md5=cc80c7c87843aa9d2e4febe406dc48b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0304397524003645-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kolmogorov complexity and nondeterminism versus determinism for polynomial time computations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tcs.2024.114747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We call any consistent and sufficiently powerful formal theory that enables to algorithmically verify whether a text is a proof <strong>algorithmically verifiable mathematics</strong> (av-mathematics). We study the fundamental question whether nondeterminism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial time computations in the framework of av-mathematics.</p><p>Our goal is to show strong indications that nondeterminism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial time computations. To do that, we do not consider decision problems only, but also compression algorithms. We show that at least one of the following three claims must be true:</p><ul><li><span>(i)</span><span><p><figure><img></figure></p></span></li><li><span>(ii)</span><span><p>non-determinism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial-time compression</p></span></li><li><span>(iii)</span><span><p>for each polynomial-time compression algorithm there exists another one of the same asymptotic time complexity that compresses infinitely many strings logarithmically stronger</p></span></li></ul><p>Another surprising consequence of P = NP would be that time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity for any polynomial bound can be computed by deterministic algorithms in polynomial time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Computer Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397524003645/pdfft?md5=cc80c7c87843aa9d2e4febe406dc48b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0304397524003645-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397524003645\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397524003645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们把任何能够用算法验证文本是否是证明的一致且足够强大的形式理论称为算法可验证数学(av-mathematics)。我们研究的基本问题是,在可验证数学的框架内,对于多项式时间计算,非决定论是否比决定论更强大。我们的目标是,有力地证明对于多项式时间计算,非决定论比决定论更强大。为此,我们不仅要考虑决策问题,还要考虑压缩算法。我们证明了以下三种说法中至少有一种必须为真:(i)(ii)对于多项式时间压缩来说,非确定性比确定性更强大(iii)对于每一种多项式时间压缩算法,都存在另一种具有相同渐近时间复杂性的算法,它压缩无限多字符串的对数能力更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kolmogorov complexity and nondeterminism versus determinism for polynomial time computations

We call any consistent and sufficiently powerful formal theory that enables to algorithmically verify whether a text is a proof algorithmically verifiable mathematics (av-mathematics). We study the fundamental question whether nondeterminism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial time computations in the framework of av-mathematics.

Our goal is to show strong indications that nondeterminism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial time computations. To do that, we do not consider decision problems only, but also compression algorithms. We show that at least one of the following three claims must be true:

  • (i)

  • (ii)

    non-determinism is more powerful than determinism for polynomial-time compression

  • (iii)

    for each polynomial-time compression algorithm there exists another one of the same asymptotic time complexity that compresses infinitely many strings logarithmically stronger

Another surprising consequence of P = NP would be that time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity for any polynomial bound can be computed by deterministic algorithms in polynomial time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical Computer Science
Theoretical Computer Science 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
471
审稿时长
12.6 months
期刊介绍: Theoretical Computer Science is mathematical and abstract in spirit, but it derives its motivation from practical and everyday computation. Its aim is to understand the nature of computation and, as a consequence of this understanding, provide more efficient methodologies. All papers introducing or studying mathematical, logic and formal concepts and methods are welcome, provided that their motivation is clearly drawn from the field of computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信