农业补贴与土地租赁价格:来自元分析的新证据

Junwen Li, Shangpu Li
{"title":"农业补贴与土地租赁价格:来自元分析的新证据","authors":"Junwen Li,&nbsp;Shangpu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.agrcom.2024.100051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The capitalization of agricultural subsidies is highly relevant to sustainable agricultural development. This study applies meta-analysis to systematically investigate the overall mean effects of capitalization of agriculture subsidies in China, the EU, and the USA. We explore capitalization rates across different types and recipients, including potential sources of heterogeneity. Our primary objective is to address the debate of whether agricultural subsidies are ultimately capitalized into land rental prices. Results show that the overall mean effect of subsidies on land capitalization in the European Union (5.5%) is greater than that in the United States (2.9%), with no significant and positive effects observed in Chinese markets. Additionally, we conclude that decoupled payments may not reduce the capitalization of agricultural subsidies in the European Union and the USA. Notably, agricultural subsidies received by landowners/contractors tend to be lower than those received by tenants. Finally, the capitalization of agricultural subsidies is influenced by several potential sources of heterogeneity, including farmland scales, aggregated data, sample sizes, lagged subsidies, and the starting and ending dates of publications. These findings provide comprehensive insights into the capitalization of agricultural subsidies and offer practical policy recommendations for the effective mitigation of capitalization rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100065,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture Communications","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949798124000279/pdfft?md5=3c85ed4f266798f8d5714232ba6a1f22&pid=1-s2.0-S2949798124000279-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agricultural subsidies and land rental prices: New evidence from meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Junwen Li,&nbsp;Shangpu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrcom.2024.100051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The capitalization of agricultural subsidies is highly relevant to sustainable agricultural development. This study applies meta-analysis to systematically investigate the overall mean effects of capitalization of agriculture subsidies in China, the EU, and the USA. We explore capitalization rates across different types and recipients, including potential sources of heterogeneity. Our primary objective is to address the debate of whether agricultural subsidies are ultimately capitalized into land rental prices. Results show that the overall mean effect of subsidies on land capitalization in the European Union (5.5%) is greater than that in the United States (2.9%), with no significant and positive effects observed in Chinese markets. Additionally, we conclude that decoupled payments may not reduce the capitalization of agricultural subsidies in the European Union and the USA. Notably, agricultural subsidies received by landowners/contractors tend to be lower than those received by tenants. Finally, the capitalization of agricultural subsidies is influenced by several potential sources of heterogeneity, including farmland scales, aggregated data, sample sizes, lagged subsidies, and the starting and ending dates of publications. These findings provide comprehensive insights into the capitalization of agricultural subsidies and offer practical policy recommendations for the effective mitigation of capitalization rates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture Communications\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949798124000279/pdfft?md5=3c85ed4f266798f8d5714232ba6a1f22&pid=1-s2.0-S2949798124000279-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949798124000279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949798124000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业补贴资本化与农业可持续发展高度相关。本研究运用荟萃分析法系统地研究了中国、欧盟和美国农业补贴资本化的总体平均效应。我们探讨了不同类型和不同补贴对象的资本化率,包括潜在的异质性来源。我们的主要目标是解决农业补贴是否最终资本化为土地租赁价格的争论。结果显示,补贴对欧盟土地资本化的总体平均影响(5.5%)大于美国(2.9%),在中国市场没有观察到显著的积极影响。此外,我们还得出结论,在欧盟和美国,脱钩支付可能不会减少农业补贴的资本化。值得注意的是,土地所有者/承包商获得的农业补贴往往低于佃农获得的补贴。最后,农业补贴的资本化受到几个潜在异质性来源的影响,包括农田规模、汇总数据、样本大小、滞后补贴以及出版物的起止日期。这些发现全面揭示了农业补贴的资本化问题,并为有效降低资本化率提供了切实可行的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agricultural subsidies and land rental prices: New evidence from meta-analysis

The capitalization of agricultural subsidies is highly relevant to sustainable agricultural development. This study applies meta-analysis to systematically investigate the overall mean effects of capitalization of agriculture subsidies in China, the EU, and the USA. We explore capitalization rates across different types and recipients, including potential sources of heterogeneity. Our primary objective is to address the debate of whether agricultural subsidies are ultimately capitalized into land rental prices. Results show that the overall mean effect of subsidies on land capitalization in the European Union (5.5%) is greater than that in the United States (2.9%), with no significant and positive effects observed in Chinese markets. Additionally, we conclude that decoupled payments may not reduce the capitalization of agricultural subsidies in the European Union and the USA. Notably, agricultural subsidies received by landowners/contractors tend to be lower than those received by tenants. Finally, the capitalization of agricultural subsidies is influenced by several potential sources of heterogeneity, including farmland scales, aggregated data, sample sizes, lagged subsidies, and the starting and ending dates of publications. These findings provide comprehensive insights into the capitalization of agricultural subsidies and offer practical policy recommendations for the effective mitigation of capitalization rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信