术前 18F-FDG PET/CT 成像与颈部切除术之间的时间间隔对检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者结节转移的重要性

Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_24
E. Koroglu, S. Sirin, S. Isgoren
{"title":"术前 18F-FDG PET/CT 成像与颈部切除术之间的时间间隔对检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者结节转移的重要性","authors":"E. Koroglu, S. Sirin, S. Isgoren","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Detection of nodal metastasis is critical for the treatment and prognosis of head and neck cancer (HNC). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly being used to detect cervical lymph node involvement.\n \n \n \n The purposes of this study were to (1) investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT for the detection of neck metastasis in patients with HNC and (2) determine the effect of the time interval between surgery and PET/CT.\n \n \n \n Fifty patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent PET/CT before surgery were included in this study. Preoperative PET/CT images that determined lymph node metastasis were compared with the histopathological analysis of neck dissection samples. Neck dissections were divided into three groups according to the time interval between surgery and PET/CT (0–2 weeks, >2–4 weeks, and >4 weeks). The concordance between PET/CT and histopathology was measured using the neck sides at different time intervals. The specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of PET/CT in detecting metastatic lymph nodes in the neck were calculated.\n \n \n \n A total of 79 neck dissections were included in the study as 29 (58%) of the patients underwent bilateral neck dissection. The overall accuracy of PET/CT in detecting nodal metastasis was highest for the 0–2 weeks interval (95.6%). During this time interval, the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of PET/CT were 100%, 90.9%, 100%, and 92.3%, respectively.\n \n \n \n Although PET/CT is an important and reliable diagnostic method for detecting nodal metastases in patients with HNC, its reliability decreases as the time between surgeries increases. The optimal interval was 2 weeks; however, up to 4 weeks was acceptable.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Importance of the Time Interval Between Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Neck Dissection for the Detection of Nodal Metastases in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"E. Koroglu, S. Sirin, S. Isgoren\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Detection of nodal metastasis is critical for the treatment and prognosis of head and neck cancer (HNC). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly being used to detect cervical lymph node involvement.\\n \\n \\n \\n The purposes of this study were to (1) investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT for the detection of neck metastasis in patients with HNC and (2) determine the effect of the time interval between surgery and PET/CT.\\n \\n \\n \\n Fifty patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent PET/CT before surgery were included in this study. Preoperative PET/CT images that determined lymph node metastasis were compared with the histopathological analysis of neck dissection samples. Neck dissections were divided into three groups according to the time interval between surgery and PET/CT (0–2 weeks, >2–4 weeks, and >4 weeks). The concordance between PET/CT and histopathology was measured using the neck sides at different time intervals. The specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of PET/CT in detecting metastatic lymph nodes in the neck were calculated.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 79 neck dissections were included in the study as 29 (58%) of the patients underwent bilateral neck dissection. The overall accuracy of PET/CT in detecting nodal metastasis was highest for the 0–2 weeks interval (95.6%). During this time interval, the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of PET/CT were 100%, 90.9%, 100%, and 92.3%, respectively.\\n \\n \\n \\n Although PET/CT is an important and reliable diagnostic method for detecting nodal metastases in patients with HNC, its reliability decreases as the time between surgeries increases. The optimal interval was 2 weeks; however, up to 4 weeks was acceptable.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结节转移的检测对于头颈癌(HNC)的治疗和预后至关重要。正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)越来越多地用于检测颈淋巴结受累情况。 本研究的目的是:(1) 探讨 PET/CT 检测 HNC 患者颈部转移的诊断准确性;(2) 确定手术与 PET/CT 之间时间间隔的影响。 本研究纳入了 50 名在手术前接受 PET/CT 检查的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者。将确定淋巴结转移的术前 PET/CT 图像与颈部切除样本的组织病理学分析进行比较。根据手术与 PET/CT 的时间间隔(0-2 周、>2-4 周和>4 周),将颈部切除术分为三组。使用不同时间间隔的颈部两侧样本测量 PET/CT 与组织病理学的一致性。计算了 PET/CT 检测颈部转移淋巴结的特异性、敏感性、准确性、阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)。 研究共纳入了 79 例颈部切除术,其中 29 例(58%)患者接受了双侧颈部切除术。PET/CT 检测结节转移的总体准确率在 0-2 周间隔内最高(95.6%)。在这个时间间隔内,PET/CT 的敏感性、特异性、NPV 和 PPV 分别为 100%、90.9%、100% 和 92.3%。 尽管 PET/CT 是检测 HNC 患者结节转移的一种重要而可靠的诊断方法,但其可靠性会随着手术间隔时间的延长而降低。最佳间隔时间为 2 周,但最长 4 周也是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
The Importance of the Time Interval Between Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Neck Dissection for the Detection of Nodal Metastases in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Detection of nodal metastasis is critical for the treatment and prognosis of head and neck cancer (HNC). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly being used to detect cervical lymph node involvement. The purposes of this study were to (1) investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT for the detection of neck metastasis in patients with HNC and (2) determine the effect of the time interval between surgery and PET/CT. Fifty patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent PET/CT before surgery were included in this study. Preoperative PET/CT images that determined lymph node metastasis were compared with the histopathological analysis of neck dissection samples. Neck dissections were divided into three groups according to the time interval between surgery and PET/CT (0–2 weeks, >2–4 weeks, and >4 weeks). The concordance between PET/CT and histopathology was measured using the neck sides at different time intervals. The specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of PET/CT in detecting metastatic lymph nodes in the neck were calculated. A total of 79 neck dissections were included in the study as 29 (58%) of the patients underwent bilateral neck dissection. The overall accuracy of PET/CT in detecting nodal metastasis was highest for the 0–2 weeks interval (95.6%). During this time interval, the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of PET/CT were 100%, 90.9%, 100%, and 92.3%, respectively. Although PET/CT is an important and reliable diagnostic method for detecting nodal metastases in patients with HNC, its reliability decreases as the time between surgeries increases. The optimal interval was 2 weeks; however, up to 4 weeks was acceptable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信