早产儿保育箱空气加湿：空洞的系统回顾

Q2 Nursing

Journal of Neonatal Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnn.2024.07.010

Tinneke Jonckers , Kiki Ruhe , Astrid Giezen , Agnes van den Hoogen , Joke Wielenga

{"title":"早产儿保育箱空气加湿：空洞的系统回顾","authors":"Tinneke Jonckers , Kiki Ruhe , Astrid Giezen , Agnes van den Hoogen , Joke Wielenga","doi":"10.1016/j.jnn.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>During the first days or weeks, humidified incubators are used for preterm infants. </span>Transepidermal water loss is then at its highest level. There is no consensus on the optimal level or the duration of humidification for preterm infants below 32 weeks GA.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to review the effects of low humidity versus moderate or high humidity levels, as well as studies investigating the impact of short versus moderate to long durations of humidity exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods/search strategy</h3><div>Randomized control trials<span><span>, cohort studies<span>, pre-posttest, and case-control studies were included. Search was performed in PubMed, </span></span>Cochrane Library<span>, Ovid Emcare, Web of Science and Embase. The selected studies were graded using the Joanna Briggs critical appraisal tool.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>No studies met the inclusion criteria; therefore, this is an empty systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The absence of evidence regarding optimal incubator humidity emphasized the need for solid research to improve outcomes for preterm infants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatal Nursing","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Humidification of incubator air for premature infants: An empty systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Tinneke Jonckers , Kiki Ruhe , Astrid Giezen , Agnes van den Hoogen , Joke Wielenga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnn.2024.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>During the first days or weeks, humidified incubators are used for preterm infants. </span>Transepidermal water loss is then at its highest level. There is no consensus on the optimal level or the duration of humidification for preterm infants below 32 weeks GA.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to review the effects of low humidity versus moderate or high humidity levels, as well as studies investigating the impact of short versus moderate to long durations of humidity exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods/search strategy</h3><div>Randomized control trials<span><span>, cohort studies<span>, pre-posttest, and case-control studies were included. Search was performed in PubMed, </span></span>Cochrane Library<span>, Ovid Emcare, Web of Science and Embase. The selected studies were graded using the Joanna Briggs critical appraisal tool.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>No studies met the inclusion criteria; therefore, this is an empty systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The absence of evidence regarding optimal incubator humidity emphasized the need for solid research to improve outcomes for preterm infants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neonatal Nursing\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neonatal Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355184124001480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355184124001480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在最初的几天或几周内，加湿保温箱用于早产儿。这时经皮失水达到最高水平。对于32周龄以下的早产儿，湿化的最佳水平或持续时间尚无共识。目的：本研究旨在回顾低湿度与中等或高湿度水平的影响，以及研究短期湿度暴露与中等或长期湿度暴露的影响。方法/检索策略纳入随机对照试验、队列研究、前后测试和病例对照研究。检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Ovid Emcare、Web of Science和Embase。选定的研究使用乔安娜布里格斯关键评估工具进行评分。没有研究符合纳入标准；因此，这是一篇空洞的系统综述。结论缺乏关于最佳培养箱湿度的证据，强调需要扎实的研究来改善早产儿的预后。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Humidification of incubator air for premature infants: An empty systematic review

Background

During the first days or weeks, humidified incubators are used for preterm infants. Transepidermal water loss is then at its highest level. There is no consensus on the optimal level or the duration of humidification for preterm infants below 32 weeks GA.

Objective

This study aimed to review the effects of low humidity versus moderate or high humidity levels, as well as studies investigating the impact of short versus moderate to long durations of humidity exposure.

Methods/search strategy

Randomized control trials, cohort studies, pre-posttest, and case-control studies were included. Search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid Emcare, Web of Science and Embase. The selected studies were graded using the Joanna Briggs critical appraisal tool.

Findings

No studies met the inclusion criteria; therefore, this is an empty systematic review.

Conclusion

The absence of evidence regarding optimal incubator humidity emphasized the need for solid research to improve outcomes for preterm infants.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Neonatal Nursing Nursing-Pediatrics

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

143

期刊介绍： Aims & Scope: This is the practical, bimonthly, research-based journal for all professionals concerned with the care of neonates and their families, both in hospital and the community. It aims to support the development of the essential practice, management, education and health promotion skills required by these professionals. The JNN will provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between the range of professionals working in this field; promote cooperation between these professionals; facilitate partnership care with families; provide information and informed opinion; promote innovation and change in the care of neonates and their families; and provide an education resource for this important rapidly developing field.