利用等离子致动器对串联气缸进行流量控制

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Benjamin Latrobe, Emmanuel Gabriel Ohanu, Eric Fernandez, Samik Bhattacharya
{"title":"利用等离子致动器对串联气缸进行流量控制","authors":"Benjamin Latrobe,&nbsp;Emmanuel Gabriel Ohanu,&nbsp;Eric Fernandez,&nbsp;Samik Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2024.111274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The flow over two circular cylinders, arranged in a tandem setup, is controlled with the help of dielectric-barrier-discharge (DBD) plasma actuators mounted on the upstream cylinder at a Reynolds number (<em>Re</em>) of 4700. The plasma actuators are mounted at <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>8</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> from the forward stagnation point of the upstream cylinder. Three tandem configurations are tested, where the distance, <span><math><mi>L</mi></math></span>, by which the cylinder centers are separated are fixed at 3, 4, and 5 cylinder diameters (<em>D</em>). For each configuration, the plasma actuators are operated at two distinct blowing ratios (<em>BR</em>) of 0.8 and 1.4, which are named as the low-power and high-power forcing cases, respectively. Results include static-pressure measurements on the downstream cylinder and wake surveys using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). High-power forcing changes the flow pattern in the <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> upstream wake from reattached to co-shedding flow, enabling alternating vortex shedding to occur between the tandem cylinders. High-power forcing also significantly weakens vortex shedding from the upstream cylinder for <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span>. This weakening is manifested through 39.27% and 35.32% reductions in the total area of vorticity contours for <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span>, respectively. However, the effect of this cancellation is most prominent on the downstream cylinder when the separation distance is <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>D</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></math></span>. During forcing with <em>BR</em> = 1.4, the static pressure on the downstream cylinder resembles that of a flow over a regular cylinder for all the cases tested. Hence, at this blowing ratio, the wake signature of the upstream cylinder is severely diminished, by delaying the shear-layer separation point. During forcing with <em>BR</em> = 0.8, no significant effect on the downstream cylinder is observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12294,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 111274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow control over tandem cylinders using plasma actuators\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Latrobe,&nbsp;Emmanuel Gabriel Ohanu,&nbsp;Eric Fernandez,&nbsp;Samik Bhattacharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2024.111274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The flow over two circular cylinders, arranged in a tandem setup, is controlled with the help of dielectric-barrier-discharge (DBD) plasma actuators mounted on the upstream cylinder at a Reynolds number (<em>Re</em>) of 4700. The plasma actuators are mounted at <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>8</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> from the forward stagnation point of the upstream cylinder. Three tandem configurations are tested, where the distance, <span><math><mi>L</mi></math></span>, by which the cylinder centers are separated are fixed at 3, 4, and 5 cylinder diameters (<em>D</em>). For each configuration, the plasma actuators are operated at two distinct blowing ratios (<em>BR</em>) of 0.8 and 1.4, which are named as the low-power and high-power forcing cases, respectively. Results include static-pressure measurements on the downstream cylinder and wake surveys using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). High-power forcing changes the flow pattern in the <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> upstream wake from reattached to co-shedding flow, enabling alternating vortex shedding to occur between the tandem cylinders. High-power forcing also significantly weakens vortex shedding from the upstream cylinder for <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span>. This weakening is manifested through 39.27% and 35.32% reductions in the total area of vorticity contours for <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span>, respectively. However, the effect of this cancellation is most prominent on the downstream cylinder when the separation distance is <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>D</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></math></span>. During forcing with <em>BR</em> = 1.4, the static pressure on the downstream cylinder resembles that of a flow over a regular cylinder for all the cases tested. Hence, at this blowing ratio, the wake signature of the upstream cylinder is severely diminished, by delaying the shear-layer separation point. During forcing with <em>BR</em> = 0.8, no significant effect on the downstream cylinder is observed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894177724001432\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894177724001432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过安装在雷诺数(Re)为 4700 的上游圆筒上的介质阻挡放电(DBD)等离子体致动器,对串联布置的两个圆形圆筒上的气流进行控制。等离子体致动器安装在上游气缸向前停滞点的±80∘处。测试了三种串联配置,气缸中心之间的距离 L 固定为 3、4 和 5 个气缸直径 (D)。对于每种配置,等离子体致动器在 0.8 和 1.4 两种不同的吹气比 (BR) 下运行,分别称为低功率和高功率强制情况。结果包括对下游气缸的静压测量和使用粒子图像测速仪(PIV)进行的尾流调查。高功率强迫改变了 L=3D 上游尾流中的流动模式,从重新附着流变为共同脱落流,从而使涡旋脱落交替出现在串联气缸之间。在 L=4D 和 L=5D 时,大功率强迫也会显著削弱上游圆柱体的涡流脱落。在 L=4D 和 L=5D 条件下,涡度等值线的总面积分别减少了 39.27% 和 35.32%,体现了这种削弱。然而,当分离距离为 L/D=3 时,这种抵消对下游气缸的影响最为显著。在 BR = 1.4 的强制过程中,下游圆柱体上的静压在所有测试情况下都类似于规则圆柱体上的气流。因此,在此吹气比下,上游圆筒的尾流特征会因剪切层分离点的延迟而严重减弱。在 BR = 0.8 的强迫过程中,没有观察到对下游圆柱体的明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flow control over tandem cylinders using plasma actuators

The flow over two circular cylinders, arranged in a tandem setup, is controlled with the help of dielectric-barrier-discharge (DBD) plasma actuators mounted on the upstream cylinder at a Reynolds number (Re) of 4700. The plasma actuators are mounted at ±80 from the forward stagnation point of the upstream cylinder. Three tandem configurations are tested, where the distance, L, by which the cylinder centers are separated are fixed at 3, 4, and 5 cylinder diameters (D). For each configuration, the plasma actuators are operated at two distinct blowing ratios (BR) of 0.8 and 1.4, which are named as the low-power and high-power forcing cases, respectively. Results include static-pressure measurements on the downstream cylinder and wake surveys using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). High-power forcing changes the flow pattern in the L=3D upstream wake from reattached to co-shedding flow, enabling alternating vortex shedding to occur between the tandem cylinders. High-power forcing also significantly weakens vortex shedding from the upstream cylinder for L=4D and L=5D. This weakening is manifested through 39.27% and 35.32% reductions in the total area of vorticity contours for L=4D and L=5D, respectively. However, the effect of this cancellation is most prominent on the downstream cylinder when the separation distance is L/D=3. During forcing with BR = 1.4, the static pressure on the downstream cylinder resembles that of a flow over a regular cylinder for all the cases tested. Hence, at this blowing ratio, the wake signature of the upstream cylinder is severely diminished, by delaying the shear-layer separation point. During forcing with BR = 0.8, no significant effect on the downstream cylinder is observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science provides a forum for research emphasizing experimental work that enhances fundamental understanding of heat transfer, thermodynamics, and fluid mechanics. In addition to the principal areas of research, the journal covers research results in related fields, including combined heat and mass transfer, flows with phase transition, micro- and nano-scale systems, multiphase flow, combustion, radiative transfer, porous media, cryogenics, turbulence, and novel experimental techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信