疑似异物吸入时的气道探查。是否始终适用?

Maria Martinez Diaz, Vicente Ibañez Pradas, Miguel Couselo Jerez, Estíbaliz Valdés Diéguez
{"title":"疑似异物吸入时的气道探查。是否始终适用?","authors":"Maria Martinez Diaz,&nbsp;Vicente Ibañez Pradas,&nbsp;Miguel Couselo Jerez,&nbsp;Estíbaliz Valdés Diéguez","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatrics. Flexible or rigid bronchoscopy is the gold standard for its diagnosis and treatment. However, despite being a minimally invasive test, it is not without risk and, given the low specificity of symptoms involved, between 45 and 70 % of diagnostic bronchoscopies (DB) performed are normal. The aim of this paper is to develop a strategy in order to reduce this percentage.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational, analytical, and retrospective study of DB performed for suspected FBA between 2018 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data, bronchoscopy findings and complications were obtained.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>96 patients admitted to DB were analyzed. 72 out of 96 (75 %) were normal. The risk of presenting a foreign body was significantly higher in patients with suspected nuts, so DB should be always indicated. In patients with suspected other materials aspiration, a multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. Statistically significant association was found between dyspnea, asymmetric auscultation and abnormal chest radiography with the presence of a foreign body on the DB; AUC = 0.97 (95 % CI 92.4 %-100 %). The proposed algorithm establishes patients at high risk of FBA and therefore the DB is recommended, with a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 87.2 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of the algorithm to patients with suspected aspiration of a foreign body other than nuts can facilitate the identification of patients with high risk of aspiration and reduce the percentage of negative DB.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000480/pdfft?md5=e7d34cece036084576aa31733293e5b7&pid=1-s2.0-S2949711624000480-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway exploration when suspected foreign body aspiration. Is it always indicated?\",\"authors\":\"Maria Martinez Diaz,&nbsp;Vicente Ibañez Pradas,&nbsp;Miguel Couselo Jerez,&nbsp;Estíbaliz Valdés Diéguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatrics. Flexible or rigid bronchoscopy is the gold standard for its diagnosis and treatment. However, despite being a minimally invasive test, it is not without risk and, given the low specificity of symptoms involved, between 45 and 70 % of diagnostic bronchoscopies (DB) performed are normal. The aim of this paper is to develop a strategy in order to reduce this percentage.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational, analytical, and retrospective study of DB performed for suspected FBA between 2018 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data, bronchoscopy findings and complications were obtained.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>96 patients admitted to DB were analyzed. 72 out of 96 (75 %) were normal. The risk of presenting a foreign body was significantly higher in patients with suspected nuts, so DB should be always indicated. In patients with suspected other materials aspiration, a multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. Statistically significant association was found between dyspnea, asymmetric auscultation and abnormal chest radiography with the presence of a foreign body on the DB; AUC = 0.97 (95 % CI 92.4 %-100 %). The proposed algorithm establishes patients at high risk of FBA and therefore the DB is recommended, with a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 87.2 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of the algorithm to patients with suspected aspiration of a foreign body other than nuts can facilitate the identification of patients with high risk of aspiration and reduce the percentage of negative DB.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000480/pdfft?md5=e7d34cece036084576aa31733293e5b7&pid=1-s2.0-S2949711624000480-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景异物吸入(FBA)是儿科发病和死亡的重要原因。柔性或硬质支气管镜检查是诊断和治疗异物吸入的金标准。然而,尽管这是一种微创检查,但并非没有风险,而且由于相关症状的特异性较低,45% 到 70% 的支气管镜诊断(DB)结果都是正常的。本文旨在制定一项策略,以降低这一比例。方法对 2018 年至 2022 年间因疑似 FBA 而进行的诊断性支气管镜进行观察、分析和回顾性研究。获得了人口统计学、临床和放射学数据、支气管镜检查结果和并发症。结果分析了96名接受DB的患者。96 例中有 72 例(75%)正常。在疑似坚果患者中,出现异物的风险明显更高,因此 DB 应始终适用。对于疑似吸入其他异物的患者,采用逻辑回归法进行了多变量分析。结果发现,呼吸困难、听诊不对称和胸片异常与 DB 存在异物之间存在明显的统计学关联;AUC = 0.97 (95 % CI 92.4 %-100 %)。结论对疑似吸入坚果以外异物的患者应用该算法有助于识别吸入异物的高危患者,并降低 DB 阴性的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Airway exploration when suspected foreign body aspiration. Is it always indicated?

Background

Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatrics. Flexible or rigid bronchoscopy is the gold standard for its diagnosis and treatment. However, despite being a minimally invasive test, it is not without risk and, given the low specificity of symptoms involved, between 45 and 70 % of diagnostic bronchoscopies (DB) performed are normal. The aim of this paper is to develop a strategy in order to reduce this percentage.

Methods

Observational, analytical, and retrospective study of DB performed for suspected FBA between 2018 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data, bronchoscopy findings and complications were obtained.

Results

96 patients admitted to DB were analyzed. 72 out of 96 (75 %) were normal. The risk of presenting a foreign body was significantly higher in patients with suspected nuts, so DB should be always indicated. In patients with suspected other materials aspiration, a multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. Statistically significant association was found between dyspnea, asymmetric auscultation and abnormal chest radiography with the presence of a foreign body on the DB; AUC = 0.97 (95 % CI 92.4 %-100 %). The proposed algorithm establishes patients at high risk of FBA and therefore the DB is recommended, with a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 87.2 %.

Conclusions

The application of the algorithm to patients with suspected aspiration of a foreign body other than nuts can facilitate the identification of patients with high risk of aspiration and reduce the percentage of negative DB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信