65.颈椎融合术在患有 II 型椎体骨折的体弱老年患者中的应用:基于 5 项改良体弱指数的倾向得分匹配分析

Q3 Medicine
{"title":"65.颈椎融合术在患有 II 型椎体骨折的体弱老年患者中的应用:基于 5 项改良体弱指数的倾向得分匹配分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><p>Type II dens fractures are a traumatic injury of the second cervical vertebrae that often require surgical fusion to prevent spinal instability and further neurological insult. In elderly patients, clinicians often opt for conservative management over surgery due to an overall higher risk of complications in this population. For patients who do undergo surgery, frailty is often used to evaluate postoperative risk. The Modified Frailty Index 5 (mFI-5) is a concise metric that has been shown to have similar clinical utility as longer scales such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index and mFI-11.</p></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><p>To evaluate and quantify which complications are more common following fusion for type II dens fractures for elderly patients with a high mFI-5 compared to those with a low mFI-5.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><p>Retrospective cohort database study.</p></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><p>Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2017-2021.</p></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><p>The primary outcome measures are mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcome measures entail hospital complications such as pressure ulcers and deep vein thrombosis and discharge disposition such as routine discharge to home and discharge to skilled nursing.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>The NTDB was queried from 2017-2021 for all patients with a traumatic type II dens fracture. Patients younger than 65 years, who did not undergo surgical fusion, or who were missing outcome data were excluded. The mFI-5 was calculated based on the presence of COPD, CHF, diabetes, hypertension, or functional impairment, with one point assigned to each. The categories were mFI-5 of 0, 1, or 2+. Propensity score matching was performed using the k-nearest neighbors algorithm based on patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, and Glasgow Coma Scale. Patients with mFI-5 of 1 and 2+ were compared with patients with mFI-5 0 using Student's t-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>A total of 2278 patients matching the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified, of which 457 had mFI-5 0, 907 had mFI-5 1, and 914 had mFI-5 2+. Following propensity score matching, 457 patients in each score group were identified. There were no significant post-match differences in outcomes between patients with mFI-5 0 and mFI-5 1. Compared to patients with mFI-5 0, patients with mFI-5 1 had a higher overall complication rate (77.46% vs 54.05%, p&lt;0.01), lower rates of routine discharge to home (16.63% vs 23.41%, p=0.01) and higher rates of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (31.07% vs 23.63%, p=0.01). Patients with mFI-5 2+ similarly had higher complication rates (71.33% vs 54.05%, p&lt;0.01), lower rates of routine discharge to home (9.63% vs 23.41%, p=0.01) and higher rates of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (37.63% vs 23.63%, p=0.01), and additionally had longer LOS (12.19 vs 10.18 days, p&lt;0.01).</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>In elderly patients with traumatic type II dens fractures who undergo surgical fusion, both moderate and and high degrees of frailty as indicated by an mFI-5 of 1 and 2+, respectively, are associated with a roughly ∼20% increase in the incidence of postoperative complications as well as greater rates of discharge to skilled nursing facilities. Cervical fusion remains the standard of care for type II dens fractures in elderly patients with low degrees of frailty, but greater care must be taken to individualize care for elderly patients with higher degrees of frailty.</p></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><p>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000969/pdfft?md5=286d58ae2f11035d154d168d1b678753&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424000969-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"65. Cervical fusion in frail elderly patients with type II dens fractures: a propensity score matched analysis based on the 5-item modified frailty index\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><p>Type II dens fractures are a traumatic injury of the second cervical vertebrae that often require surgical fusion to prevent spinal instability and further neurological insult. In elderly patients, clinicians often opt for conservative management over surgery due to an overall higher risk of complications in this population. For patients who do undergo surgery, frailty is often used to evaluate postoperative risk. The Modified Frailty Index 5 (mFI-5) is a concise metric that has been shown to have similar clinical utility as longer scales such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index and mFI-11.</p></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><p>To evaluate and quantify which complications are more common following fusion for type II dens fractures for elderly patients with a high mFI-5 compared to those with a low mFI-5.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><p>Retrospective cohort database study.</p></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><p>Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2017-2021.</p></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><p>The primary outcome measures are mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcome measures entail hospital complications such as pressure ulcers and deep vein thrombosis and discharge disposition such as routine discharge to home and discharge to skilled nursing.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>The NTDB was queried from 2017-2021 for all patients with a traumatic type II dens fracture. Patients younger than 65 years, who did not undergo surgical fusion, or who were missing outcome data were excluded. The mFI-5 was calculated based on the presence of COPD, CHF, diabetes, hypertension, or functional impairment, with one point assigned to each. The categories were mFI-5 of 0, 1, or 2+. Propensity score matching was performed using the k-nearest neighbors algorithm based on patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, and Glasgow Coma Scale. Patients with mFI-5 of 1 and 2+ were compared with patients with mFI-5 0 using Student's t-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>A total of 2278 patients matching the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified, of which 457 had mFI-5 0, 907 had mFI-5 1, and 914 had mFI-5 2+. Following propensity score matching, 457 patients in each score group were identified. There were no significant post-match differences in outcomes between patients with mFI-5 0 and mFI-5 1. Compared to patients with mFI-5 0, patients with mFI-5 1 had a higher overall complication rate (77.46% vs 54.05%, p&lt;0.01), lower rates of routine discharge to home (16.63% vs 23.41%, p=0.01) and higher rates of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (31.07% vs 23.63%, p=0.01). Patients with mFI-5 2+ similarly had higher complication rates (71.33% vs 54.05%, p&lt;0.01), lower rates of routine discharge to home (9.63% vs 23.41%, p=0.01) and higher rates of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (37.63% vs 23.63%, p=0.01), and additionally had longer LOS (12.19 vs 10.18 days, p&lt;0.01).</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>In elderly patients with traumatic type II dens fractures who undergo surgical fusion, both moderate and and high degrees of frailty as indicated by an mFI-5 of 1 and 2+, respectively, are associated with a roughly ∼20% increase in the incidence of postoperative complications as well as greater rates of discharge to skilled nursing facilities. Cervical fusion remains the standard of care for type II dens fractures in elderly patients with low degrees of frailty, but greater care must be taken to individualize care for elderly patients with higher degrees of frailty.</p></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><p>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000969/pdfft?md5=286d58ae2f11035d154d168d1b678753&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424000969-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 CONTEXTYPE II 型椎弓根骨折是第二颈椎的一种外伤性损伤,通常需要进行手术融合以防止脊柱不稳定和进一步的神经损伤。对于老年患者,临床医生通常会选择保守治疗,而不是手术治疗,因为老年患者出现并发症的风险较高。对于接受手术的患者,虚弱程度通常被用来评估术后风险。目的评估并量化高 mFI-5 老年患者与低 mFI-5 老年患者在 II 型椎体骨折融合术后哪些并发症更常见。研究设计/设置回顾性队列数据库研究。患者样本来自美国外科学院国家创伤数据库(NTDB)2017-2021年的患者。结果测量主要结果测量为死亡率和住院时间(LOS)。次要结局指标包括医院并发症(如压疮和深静脉血栓形成)和出院处置(如常规出院回家和出院到专业护理机构)。方法:在2017-2021年期间,对NTDB中所有外伤性II型穹隆骨折患者进行了查询。排除了年龄小于 65 岁、未进行手术融合或结果数据缺失的患者。mFI-5 根据是否患有慢性阻塞性肺病、慢性心力衰竭、糖尿病、高血压或功能障碍进行计算,每种情况得一分。mFI-5分为0、1或2+。根据患者的年龄、性别、种族、民族、保险类型和格拉斯哥昏迷量表,使用 k 近邻算法进行倾向得分匹配。采用学生 t 检验和皮尔逊卡方检验将 mFI-5 为 1 和 2+ 的患者与 mFI-5 为 0 的患者进行比较。结果共确定了 2278 名符合纳入和排除标准的患者,其中 457 名 mFI-5 为 0,907 名 mFI-5 为 1,914 名 mFI-5 为 2+。经过倾向评分匹配后,每个评分组均确定了 457 名患者。与 mFI-5 0 患者相比,mFI-5 1 患者的总体并发症发生率更高(77.46% vs 54.05%,p<0.01),常规出院回家的比例更低(16.63% vs 23.41%,p=0.01),出院到专业护理机构的比例更高(31.07% vs 23.63%,p=0.01)。mFI-5 2+ 患者的并发症发生率同样较高(71.33% vs 54.05%,p<0.01),常规出院回家的比例较低(9.63% vs 23.41%,p=0.01),出院到专业护理机构的比例较高(37.63% vs 23.63%,p=0.01),此外,患者的生命周期较长(12.19 vs 10.18 天,p<0.01)。结论 在接受手术融合的外伤性 II 型椎弓根骨折老年患者中,中度和高度虚弱(分别以 mFI-5 为 1 和 2+ 为指标)与术后并发症的发生率增加约 20%,以及更多患者出院前往专业护理机构有关。颈椎融合术仍是体弱程度较低的老年患者治疗II型椎体骨折的标准方法,但对于体弱程度较高的老年患者,必须更加注意个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
65. Cervical fusion in frail elderly patients with type II dens fractures: a propensity score matched analysis based on the 5-item modified frailty index

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Type II dens fractures are a traumatic injury of the second cervical vertebrae that often require surgical fusion to prevent spinal instability and further neurological insult. In elderly patients, clinicians often opt for conservative management over surgery due to an overall higher risk of complications in this population. For patients who do undergo surgery, frailty is often used to evaluate postoperative risk. The Modified Frailty Index 5 (mFI-5) is a concise metric that has been shown to have similar clinical utility as longer scales such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index and mFI-11.

PURPOSE

To evaluate and quantify which complications are more common following fusion for type II dens fractures for elderly patients with a high mFI-5 compared to those with a low mFI-5.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort database study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2017-2021.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures are mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcome measures entail hospital complications such as pressure ulcers and deep vein thrombosis and discharge disposition such as routine discharge to home and discharge to skilled nursing.

METHODS

The NTDB was queried from 2017-2021 for all patients with a traumatic type II dens fracture. Patients younger than 65 years, who did not undergo surgical fusion, or who were missing outcome data were excluded. The mFI-5 was calculated based on the presence of COPD, CHF, diabetes, hypertension, or functional impairment, with one point assigned to each. The categories were mFI-5 of 0, 1, or 2+. Propensity score matching was performed using the k-nearest neighbors algorithm based on patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, and Glasgow Coma Scale. Patients with mFI-5 of 1 and 2+ were compared with patients with mFI-5 0 using Student's t-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests.

RESULTS

A total of 2278 patients matching the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified, of which 457 had mFI-5 0, 907 had mFI-5 1, and 914 had mFI-5 2+. Following propensity score matching, 457 patients in each score group were identified. There were no significant post-match differences in outcomes between patients with mFI-5 0 and mFI-5 1. Compared to patients with mFI-5 0, patients with mFI-5 1 had a higher overall complication rate (77.46% vs 54.05%, p<0.01), lower rates of routine discharge to home (16.63% vs 23.41%, p=0.01) and higher rates of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (31.07% vs 23.63%, p=0.01). Patients with mFI-5 2+ similarly had higher complication rates (71.33% vs 54.05%, p<0.01), lower rates of routine discharge to home (9.63% vs 23.41%, p=0.01) and higher rates of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (37.63% vs 23.63%, p=0.01), and additionally had longer LOS (12.19 vs 10.18 days, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with traumatic type II dens fractures who undergo surgical fusion, both moderate and and high degrees of frailty as indicated by an mFI-5 of 1 and 2+, respectively, are associated with a roughly ∼20% increase in the incidence of postoperative complications as well as greater rates of discharge to skilled nursing facilities. Cervical fusion remains the standard of care for type II dens fractures in elderly patients with low degrees of frailty, but greater care must be taken to individualize care for elderly patients with higher degrees of frailty.

FDA Device/Drug Status

This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信