开放活检在假体周围关节感染诊断中的价值

Q2 Medicine
Adrik Z. Da Silva BS , Michael A. Moverman MD , Silvia M. Soule BS , Christopher D. Joyce MD , Robert Z. Tashjian MD , Peter N. Chalmers MD
{"title":"开放活检在假体周围关节感染诊断中的价值","authors":"Adrik Z. Da Silva BS ,&nbsp;Michael A. Moverman MD ,&nbsp;Silvia M. Soule BS ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Joyce MD ,&nbsp;Robert Z. Tashjian MD ,&nbsp;Peter N. Chalmers MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Determining the presence of bacteria in the shoulder prior to shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging especially in the case of revision arthroplasty. An open biopsy provides an opportunity to obtain tissue samples with minimal patient morbidity. The purpose of this study was to characterize the diagnostic utility of an open shoulder biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed at an academic medical center. All patients that underwent an open shoulder biopsy using a small proximal deltopectoral incision between 2008 and 2021 were included. Demographics, surgical history, culture results, and development of subsequent infection were recorded. Subsequent infection was defined as the development of a sinus tract, purulent drainage, or revision surgery with greater than or equal to two tissues specimens with growth of the same bacterial species. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of an open biopsy were calculated based on the development of subsequent infection. As culture positive patients were treated for their infection, positive predictive value and specificity could not be determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 55 patients that underwent 75 open biopsies. Most patients had a shoulder arthroplasty in place at the time of biopsy (69.1%), while 23.6% had an antibiotic spacer, and 7.3% had a native shoulder. Patients with a history of infection were more likely to have a spacer in place at the time of biopsy (65% vs. 0%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The sensitivity of an open biopsy was 60% and the NPV was 83% among patients with a shoulder arthroplasty with no history of infection to predict infection after revision arthroplasty. The sensitivity was 63% and NPV was 75% among patients with any history of shoulder infection. The sensitivity was 67% and the NPV was 83% among patients with an arthroplasty in place at the time of biopsy independent of prior infection. The sensitivity was 62% and the NPV was 75% among patients with an antibiotic spacer at the time of biopsy. Mean operative time was 32.2 ± 10.5 minutes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This diagnostic utility of an open shoulder biopsy is not influenced by whether there is a history of infection or whether there is currently a spacer or an arthroplasty in place, with a sensitivity between 60% and 67% and a NPV between 75% and 83%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of an open biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection\",\"authors\":\"Adrik Z. Da Silva BS ,&nbsp;Michael A. Moverman MD ,&nbsp;Silvia M. Soule BS ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Joyce MD ,&nbsp;Robert Z. Tashjian MD ,&nbsp;Peter N. Chalmers MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Determining the presence of bacteria in the shoulder prior to shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging especially in the case of revision arthroplasty. An open biopsy provides an opportunity to obtain tissue samples with minimal patient morbidity. The purpose of this study was to characterize the diagnostic utility of an open shoulder biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed at an academic medical center. All patients that underwent an open shoulder biopsy using a small proximal deltopectoral incision between 2008 and 2021 were included. Demographics, surgical history, culture results, and development of subsequent infection were recorded. Subsequent infection was defined as the development of a sinus tract, purulent drainage, or revision surgery with greater than or equal to two tissues specimens with growth of the same bacterial species. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of an open biopsy were calculated based on the development of subsequent infection. As culture positive patients were treated for their infection, positive predictive value and specificity could not be determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 55 patients that underwent 75 open biopsies. Most patients had a shoulder arthroplasty in place at the time of biopsy (69.1%), while 23.6% had an antibiotic spacer, and 7.3% had a native shoulder. Patients with a history of infection were more likely to have a spacer in place at the time of biopsy (65% vs. 0%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The sensitivity of an open biopsy was 60% and the NPV was 83% among patients with a shoulder arthroplasty with no history of infection to predict infection after revision arthroplasty. The sensitivity was 63% and NPV was 75% among patients with any history of shoulder infection. The sensitivity was 67% and the NPV was 83% among patients with an arthroplasty in place at the time of biopsy independent of prior infection. The sensitivity was 62% and the NPV was 75% among patients with an antibiotic spacer at the time of biopsy. Mean operative time was 32.2 ± 10.5 minutes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This diagnostic utility of an open shoulder biopsy is not influenced by whether there is a history of infection or whether there is currently a spacer or an arthroplasty in place, with a sensitivity between 60% and 67% and a NPV between 75% and 83%.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在肩关节置换术前确定肩部是否存在细菌是一项挑战,尤其是在翻修关节置换术中。开放式活组织检查可在患者发病率最低的情况下获取组织样本。本研究的目的是鉴定开放式肩关节活检的诊断效用。方法在一家学术医疗中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究纳入了 2008 年至 2021 年期间使用胸骨近端小切口进行开放式肩关节活检的所有患者。研究人员记录了患者的人口统计学特征、手术史、培养结果和继发感染情况。继发感染的定义是出现窦道、化脓性引流或翻修手术,且有多于或等于两个组织标本生长出相同的细菌种类。根据继发感染的情况计算开放活检的敏感性和阴性预测值(NPV)。由于培养阳性患者接受了感染治疗,因此无法确定阳性预测值和特异性。大多数患者在活检时已进行了肩关节置换术(69.1%),23.6%的患者使用了抗生素垫片,7.3%的患者使用的是原生肩关节。有感染史的患者更有可能在活检时安装了间隔器(65% vs. 0%; P <.001)。在无感染史的肩关节置换术患者中,开放活检预测翻修关节置换术后感染的灵敏度为60%,NPV为83%。在有肩关节感染史的患者中,敏感性为 63%,NPV 为 75%。在活组织检查时已完成关节置换术且无感染史的患者中,灵敏度为 67%,NPV 为 83%。活检时使用抗生素垫片的患者的敏感性为62%,NPV为75%。平均手术时间为(32.2 ± 10.5)分钟。讨论这种开放式肩关节活检的诊断效用不受是否有感染病史或目前是否安装了垫片或关节成形术的影响,灵敏度在60%至67%之间,NPV在75%至83%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of an open biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Background

Determining the presence of bacteria in the shoulder prior to shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging especially in the case of revision arthroplasty. An open biopsy provides an opportunity to obtain tissue samples with minimal patient morbidity. The purpose of this study was to characterize the diagnostic utility of an open shoulder biopsy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed at an academic medical center. All patients that underwent an open shoulder biopsy using a small proximal deltopectoral incision between 2008 and 2021 were included. Demographics, surgical history, culture results, and development of subsequent infection were recorded. Subsequent infection was defined as the development of a sinus tract, purulent drainage, or revision surgery with greater than or equal to two tissues specimens with growth of the same bacterial species. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of an open biopsy were calculated based on the development of subsequent infection. As culture positive patients were treated for their infection, positive predictive value and specificity could not be determined.

Results

We identified 55 patients that underwent 75 open biopsies. Most patients had a shoulder arthroplasty in place at the time of biopsy (69.1%), while 23.6% had an antibiotic spacer, and 7.3% had a native shoulder. Patients with a history of infection were more likely to have a spacer in place at the time of biopsy (65% vs. 0%; P < .001). The sensitivity of an open biopsy was 60% and the NPV was 83% among patients with a shoulder arthroplasty with no history of infection to predict infection after revision arthroplasty. The sensitivity was 63% and NPV was 75% among patients with any history of shoulder infection. The sensitivity was 67% and the NPV was 83% among patients with an arthroplasty in place at the time of biopsy independent of prior infection. The sensitivity was 62% and the NPV was 75% among patients with an antibiotic spacer at the time of biopsy. Mean operative time was 32.2 ± 10.5 minutes.

Discussion

This diagnostic utility of an open shoulder biopsy is not influenced by whether there is a history of infection or whether there is currently a spacer or an arthroplasty in place, with a sensitivity between 60% and 67% and a NPV between 75% and 83%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信