{"title":"宗教与种姓交汇处的健康差异:印度的证据","authors":"Biplab Kumar Datta , Shriya Thakkar","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The provisions and recognition of Schedule Castes (SCs), the constitutional term for the Dalits in India, have been exclusively extended to Hindus, Buddhists, and Sikhs (HBS). Omission of Dalit Muslims and Christians (MC) from the SC category stripped them of the affirmative action benefits tied with the SC status. This study aimed to explore how such differential treatment might play a role in differential health outcomes in Dalit women in India.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Drawing data on 177,346 Dalit women, aged 20 to 49 years, from two successive nationally representative surveys, we assessed the differential likelihood of hypertension and diabetes, between MC- and HBS- Dalit women. Accounting for birth cohort-, survey wave-, and state of residence- fixed effects, along with socioeconomic conditions and cardiometabolic risk factors, we obtained adjusted odds of having hypertension and diabetes in MC women. To check the validity of our results, we conducted similar analyses using data on 170,889 Scheduled Tribe (ST) women, another marginalized group, whose ST-status recognition were not tied to religion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that Dalit MC women were 1.13 (95% CI: 1.03–1.25) and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.05–1.36) times more likely to have hypertension and diabetes, respectively, compared to Dalit HBS women. Conversely, no statistically significant differential likelihood of these conditions was observed between MC and HBS women in the ST sample.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our investigation thus, indicated a potential link at the crossroads of religion and caste that may contribute to the health disparities among marginalized women in India.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000224/pdfft?md5=1a72cad904fb9b30a72822d49d7d4d12&pid=1-s2.0-S2772653324000224-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health disparity at the intersection of religion and caste: Evidence from India\",\"authors\":\"Biplab Kumar Datta , Shriya Thakkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The provisions and recognition of Schedule Castes (SCs), the constitutional term for the Dalits in India, have been exclusively extended to Hindus, Buddhists, and Sikhs (HBS). Omission of Dalit Muslims and Christians (MC) from the SC category stripped them of the affirmative action benefits tied with the SC status. This study aimed to explore how such differential treatment might play a role in differential health outcomes in Dalit women in India.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Drawing data on 177,346 Dalit women, aged 20 to 49 years, from two successive nationally representative surveys, we assessed the differential likelihood of hypertension and diabetes, between MC- and HBS- Dalit women. Accounting for birth cohort-, survey wave-, and state of residence- fixed effects, along with socioeconomic conditions and cardiometabolic risk factors, we obtained adjusted odds of having hypertension and diabetes in MC women. To check the validity of our results, we conducted similar analyses using data on 170,889 Scheduled Tribe (ST) women, another marginalized group, whose ST-status recognition were not tied to religion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that Dalit MC women were 1.13 (95% CI: 1.03–1.25) and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.05–1.36) times more likely to have hypertension and diabetes, respectively, compared to Dalit HBS women. Conversely, no statistically significant differential likelihood of these conditions was observed between MC and HBS women in the ST sample.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our investigation thus, indicated a potential link at the crossroads of religion and caste that may contribute to the health disparities among marginalized women in India.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000224/pdfft?md5=1a72cad904fb9b30a72822d49d7d4d12&pid=1-s2.0-S2772653324000224-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标印度宪法对贱民(SC)的规定和承认只适用于印度教徒、佛教徒和锡克教徒(HBS)。将达利特穆斯林和基督徒(MC)排除在在册种姓之外,使他们失去了与在册种姓身份相联系的平权行动利益。本研究旨在探讨这种差别待遇如何对印度达利特妇女的不同健康结果产生影响。方法我们从连续两次具有全国代表性的调查中提取了 177,346 名年龄在 20 至 49 岁之间的达利特妇女的数据,评估了穆斯林达利特妇女和锡克教徒达利特妇女患高血压和糖尿病的不同可能性。考虑到出生队列、调查波次和居住州的固定效应,以及社会经济条件和心脏代谢风险因素,我们得出了 MC 妇女患高血压和糖尿病的调整后几率。为了检验结果的有效性,我们利用另一个边缘化群体--170,889 名贱民部落(ST)妇女的数据进行了类似的分析,这些妇女的 ST 地位认定与宗教信仰无关。结果我们发现,与贱民 HBS 妇女相比,贱民 MC 妇女患高血压和糖尿病的几率分别高出 1.13 倍(95% CI:1.03-1.25)和 1.19 倍(95% CI:1.05-1.36)。结论因此,我们的调查表明,在宗教和种姓的交叉点上存在着一种潜在的联系,可能会导致印度边缘化妇女在健康方面的差异。
Health disparity at the intersection of religion and caste: Evidence from India
Objective
The provisions and recognition of Schedule Castes (SCs), the constitutional term for the Dalits in India, have been exclusively extended to Hindus, Buddhists, and Sikhs (HBS). Omission of Dalit Muslims and Christians (MC) from the SC category stripped them of the affirmative action benefits tied with the SC status. This study aimed to explore how such differential treatment might play a role in differential health outcomes in Dalit women in India.
Methods
Drawing data on 177,346 Dalit women, aged 20 to 49 years, from two successive nationally representative surveys, we assessed the differential likelihood of hypertension and diabetes, between MC- and HBS- Dalit women. Accounting for birth cohort-, survey wave-, and state of residence- fixed effects, along with socioeconomic conditions and cardiometabolic risk factors, we obtained adjusted odds of having hypertension and diabetes in MC women. To check the validity of our results, we conducted similar analyses using data on 170,889 Scheduled Tribe (ST) women, another marginalized group, whose ST-status recognition were not tied to religion.
Results
We found that Dalit MC women were 1.13 (95% CI: 1.03–1.25) and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.05–1.36) times more likely to have hypertension and diabetes, respectively, compared to Dalit HBS women. Conversely, no statistically significant differential likelihood of these conditions was observed between MC and HBS women in the ST sample.
Conclusion
Our investigation thus, indicated a potential link at the crossroads of religion and caste that may contribute to the health disparities among marginalized women in India.