{"title":"小细胞肺癌（SCLC）分级预后评估的有效性检验以及针对 SCLC 脑转移患者的新指标建议","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>We performed a validity test of a recently-reported, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) graded prognostic assessment (GPA) system for SCLC patients with brain metastases (BMs). Thereafter, we created a new prognostic index, the SCLC Grade, for such patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We studied 508 SCLC patients selected from among nearly 7000 consecutive patients undergoing gamma knife SRS for BMs since 1998.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the SCLC GPA, there were no median survival time (MST) differences among pairs of the neighboring subgroups. Therefore, the 508 patients were randomly divided into the two series, i.e., a test (340 patients) and a validity (168) series. In the test series, five factors were identified by univariable analyses as favoring longer survival (rounded lower 95 % CI of the HR was at least 1.3): Sex, Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor numbers, primary tumor status and extracerebral metastases. This new index is the sum of scores (0 and 1) of these five factors: SCLC-Grade 4–6 (score of 4, 5 or 6), 2–3 (2 or 3), and 0–1 (0 or 1). This new system showed highly statistically significant MST differences among subclasses. Next, this SCLC-Grade was applied to the verification series. Consistent results were obtained, i.e., there were highly statistically significant MST differences among subclasses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our validity test results for the SCLC GPA demonstrated this system to not precisely reflect the outcomes of SCLC patients with BMs. Our results suggest the herein-proposed SCLC-Grade to have superior prognostic value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000971/pdfft?md5=c0b81453b4a2b570145c50f0bf387d63&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000971-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity test of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) graded prognostic assessment and proposal of a new index for patients with brain metastases from SCLC\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>We performed a validity test of a recently-reported, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) graded prognostic assessment (GPA) system for SCLC patients with brain metastases (BMs). Thereafter, we created a new prognostic index, the SCLC Grade, for such patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We studied 508 SCLC patients selected from among nearly 7000 consecutive patients undergoing gamma knife SRS for BMs since 1998.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the SCLC GPA, there were no median survival time (MST) differences among pairs of the neighboring subgroups. Therefore, the 508 patients were randomly divided into the two series, i.e., a test (340 patients) and a validity (168) series. In the test series, five factors were identified by univariable analyses as favoring longer survival (rounded lower 95 % CI of the HR was at least 1.3): Sex, Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor numbers, primary tumor status and extracerebral metastases. This new index is the sum of scores (0 and 1) of these five factors: SCLC-Grade 4–6 (score of 4, 5 or 6), 2–3 (2 or 3), and 0–1 (0 or 1). This new system showed highly statistically significant MST differences among subclasses. Next, this SCLC-Grade was applied to the verification series. Consistent results were obtained, i.e., there were highly statistically significant MST differences among subclasses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our validity test results for the SCLC GPA demonstrated this system to not precisely reflect the outcomes of SCLC patients with BMs. Our results suggest the herein-proposed SCLC-Grade to have superior prognostic value.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000971/pdfft?md5=c0b81453b4a2b570145c50f0bf387d63&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000971-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000971\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity test of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) graded prognostic assessment and proposal of a new index for patients with brain metastases from SCLC
Background and purpose
We performed a validity test of a recently-reported, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) graded prognostic assessment (GPA) system for SCLC patients with brain metastases (BMs). Thereafter, we created a new prognostic index, the SCLC Grade, for such patients.
Materials and methods
We studied 508 SCLC patients selected from among nearly 7000 consecutive patients undergoing gamma knife SRS for BMs since 1998.
Results
In the SCLC GPA, there were no median survival time (MST) differences among pairs of the neighboring subgroups. Therefore, the 508 patients were randomly divided into the two series, i.e., a test (340 patients) and a validity (168) series. In the test series, five factors were identified by univariable analyses as favoring longer survival (rounded lower 95 % CI of the HR was at least 1.3): Sex, Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor numbers, primary tumor status and extracerebral metastases. This new index is the sum of scores (0 and 1) of these five factors: SCLC-Grade 4–6 (score of 4, 5 or 6), 2–3 (2 or 3), and 0–1 (0 or 1). This new system showed highly statistically significant MST differences among subclasses. Next, this SCLC-Grade was applied to the verification series. Consistent results were obtained, i.e., there were highly statistically significant MST differences among subclasses.
Conclusions
Our validity test results for the SCLC GPA demonstrated this system to not precisely reflect the outcomes of SCLC patients with BMs. Our results suggest the herein-proposed SCLC-Grade to have superior prognostic value.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
