{"title":"利用免疫组化技术分析弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤,在发芽中心和非发芽中心 B 细胞亚型中识别双重表达的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤","authors":"E. J. Rani, Jasmin Scaria, P. Sathi","doi":"10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_100_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) within non-Hodgkin lymphoma has several morphologic and clinicopathologic variants. DLBCL has two prognostically important subtypes, germinal center B cell (GCB) and nongerminal center (Non-GCB) with the non-GCB having an inferior outcome. Immunohistochemical co-expression of cellular myelocytomatosis (CMYC) and BCL2 in DLBCL has poor prognosis and is considered as double-expressor lymphoma (DEL).\n \n \n \n This study was done to identify DEL using immunohistochemistry among GCB and non-GCB DLBCL and to assess their treatment response.\n \n \n \n A retrospective analysis of 97 DLBCL cases received in our department was done. Formalin-fixed paraffin blocks were used to prepare Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections, immunohistochemical subtyping (into GCB and non-GCB using CD10, BCL6, and MUM1) and further to identify DEL (using CMYC and BCL2).\n \n \n \n Analysis was done using Chi-square test (Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 18), and P <.05 was considered significant. Kaplan-Meier test was used to estimate overall survival.\n \n \n \n Of the total 97 DLBCL cases analyzed, 33 (34%) were DEL and 64 (66%) were non-DEL. Of the DEL, 13 (13.40%) were GCB subtype and 20 (20.6%) were non-GCB. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival and treatment response between DEL and non-DEL.\n \n \n \n In this study, we found that DEL constituted about one-third of the total DLBCL and within the DEL non-GCB subtype was more common. Further studies should be performed in large population to study the difference in clinical outcome.\n","PeriodicalId":18412,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma using Immunohistochemistry to Identify Double Expressor Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma among Germinal Centre and Non Germinal Centre B Cell Subtypes\",\"authors\":\"E. J. Rani, Jasmin Scaria, P. Sathi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_100_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) within non-Hodgkin lymphoma has several morphologic and clinicopathologic variants. DLBCL has two prognostically important subtypes, germinal center B cell (GCB) and nongerminal center (Non-GCB) with the non-GCB having an inferior outcome. Immunohistochemical co-expression of cellular myelocytomatosis (CMYC) and BCL2 in DLBCL has poor prognosis and is considered as double-expressor lymphoma (DEL).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study was done to identify DEL using immunohistochemistry among GCB and non-GCB DLBCL and to assess their treatment response.\\n \\n \\n \\n A retrospective analysis of 97 DLBCL cases received in our department was done. Formalin-fixed paraffin blocks were used to prepare Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections, immunohistochemical subtyping (into GCB and non-GCB using CD10, BCL6, and MUM1) and further to identify DEL (using CMYC and BCL2).\\n \\n \\n \\n Analysis was done using Chi-square test (Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 18), and P <.05 was considered significant. Kaplan-Meier test was used to estimate overall survival.\\n \\n \\n \\n Of the total 97 DLBCL cases analyzed, 33 (34%) were DEL and 64 (66%) were non-DEL. Of the DEL, 13 (13.40%) were GCB subtype and 20 (20.6%) were non-GCB. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival and treatment response between DEL and non-DEL.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this study, we found that DEL constituted about one-third of the total DLBCL and within the DEL non-GCB subtype was more common. Further studies should be performed in large population to study the difference in clinical outcome.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":18412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_100_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_100_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma using Immunohistochemistry to Identify Double Expressor Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma among Germinal Centre and Non Germinal Centre B Cell Subtypes
ABSTRACT
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) within non-Hodgkin lymphoma has several morphologic and clinicopathologic variants. DLBCL has two prognostically important subtypes, germinal center B cell (GCB) and nongerminal center (Non-GCB) with the non-GCB having an inferior outcome. Immunohistochemical co-expression of cellular myelocytomatosis (CMYC) and BCL2 in DLBCL has poor prognosis and is considered as double-expressor lymphoma (DEL).
This study was done to identify DEL using immunohistochemistry among GCB and non-GCB DLBCL and to assess their treatment response.
A retrospective analysis of 97 DLBCL cases received in our department was done. Formalin-fixed paraffin blocks were used to prepare Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections, immunohistochemical subtyping (into GCB and non-GCB using CD10, BCL6, and MUM1) and further to identify DEL (using CMYC and BCL2).
Analysis was done using Chi-square test (Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 18), and P <.05 was considered significant. Kaplan-Meier test was used to estimate overall survival.
Of the total 97 DLBCL cases analyzed, 33 (34%) were DEL and 64 (66%) were non-DEL. Of the DEL, 13 (13.40%) were GCB subtype and 20 (20.6%) were non-GCB. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival and treatment response between DEL and non-DEL.
In this study, we found that DEL constituted about one-third of the total DLBCL and within the DEL non-GCB subtype was more common. Further studies should be performed in large population to study the difference in clinical outcome.