将信息论分析与太阳风结构的交叉相关分析和最小方差分析进行比较

Space Weather Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1029/2024sw003870
K. M. Holland, H. Nykyri, X. Ma, S. Wing
{"title":"将信息论分析与太阳风结构的交叉相关分析和最小方差分析进行比较","authors":"K. M. Holland, H. Nykyri, X. Ma, S. Wing","doi":"10.1029/2024sw003870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The space weather effects at the Earth's magnetosphere are mostly driven by the solar wind that carries the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). In this paper, we use 2 years of data in the solar wind from lunar orbiting ARTEMIS and MMS spacecraft upstream of the Earth's bow shock to study the structure of the IMF. We determine the lag times of IMF structures and their dependence on spacecraft positions by conducting an information theory analysis and comparing it with two traditional analysis methods: cross‐correlation (CC) analysis and minimum variance of magnetic field analysis (MVAB). For the events with long time intervals (i.e., >4 hr) and with small‐spatial separation between the MMS and ARTEMIS along the yGSM‐direction (i.e., <40Re, where Re is the Earth's radius), the lag times based on the CC and the mutual information (MI) analyses statistically agree with each other, with p‐values of 1.675 × 10−7 and 4.833 × 10−9, with the confidence of 95%. Both the results based on MI and CC have a large deviation from the results from MVAB. For some of the events, such a deviation could be improved by taking the fast mode speed into account; however, p‐tests showed that they were not statistically significant to the 95% confidence level.","PeriodicalId":510519,"journal":{"name":"Space Weather","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Information Theory Analysis With Cross‐Correlation and Minimum Variance Analysis of the Solar Wind Structures\",\"authors\":\"K. M. Holland, H. Nykyri, X. Ma, S. Wing\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024sw003870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The space weather effects at the Earth's magnetosphere are mostly driven by the solar wind that carries the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). In this paper, we use 2 years of data in the solar wind from lunar orbiting ARTEMIS and MMS spacecraft upstream of the Earth's bow shock to study the structure of the IMF. We determine the lag times of IMF structures and their dependence on spacecraft positions by conducting an information theory analysis and comparing it with two traditional analysis methods: cross‐correlation (CC) analysis and minimum variance of magnetic field analysis (MVAB). For the events with long time intervals (i.e., >4 hr) and with small‐spatial separation between the MMS and ARTEMIS along the yGSM‐direction (i.e., <40Re, where Re is the Earth's radius), the lag times based on the CC and the mutual information (MI) analyses statistically agree with each other, with p‐values of 1.675 × 10−7 and 4.833 × 10−9, with the confidence of 95%. Both the results based on MI and CC have a large deviation from the results from MVAB. For some of the events, such a deviation could be improved by taking the fast mode speed into account; however, p‐tests showed that they were not statistically significant to the 95% confidence level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Space Weather\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Space Weather\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024sw003870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Weather","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024sw003870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地球磁层的空间天气效应主要由携带行星际磁场(IMF)的太阳风驱动。在本文中,我们利用来自地球弓形冲击上游的月球轨道 ARTEMIS 和 MMS 航天器的两年太阳风数据来研究 IMF 的结构。我们通过信息论分析确定了 IMF 结构的滞后时间及其与航天器位置的关系,并与两种传统分析方法进行了比较:交叉相关分析(CC)和磁场最小方差分析(MVAB)。对于时间间隔较长(即大于 4 小时)且沿 yGSM 方向 MMS 和 ARTEMIS 之间空间间隔较小(即小于 40Re,Re 为地球半径)的事件,基于 CC 和互信息(MI)分析的滞后时间在统计上是一致的,P 值分别为 1.675 × 10-7 和 4.833 × 10-9,置信度为 95%。基于 MI 和 CC 的结果都与 MVAB 的结果有较大偏差。对于某些事件,考虑到快速模式速度后,这种偏差可能会有所改善;但 p 检验表明,在 95% 的置信水平下,这些偏差在统计上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Information Theory Analysis With Cross‐Correlation and Minimum Variance Analysis of the Solar Wind Structures
The space weather effects at the Earth's magnetosphere are mostly driven by the solar wind that carries the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). In this paper, we use 2 years of data in the solar wind from lunar orbiting ARTEMIS and MMS spacecraft upstream of the Earth's bow shock to study the structure of the IMF. We determine the lag times of IMF structures and their dependence on spacecraft positions by conducting an information theory analysis and comparing it with two traditional analysis methods: cross‐correlation (CC) analysis and minimum variance of magnetic field analysis (MVAB). For the events with long time intervals (i.e., >4 hr) and with small‐spatial separation between the MMS and ARTEMIS along the yGSM‐direction (i.e., <40Re, where Re is the Earth's radius), the lag times based on the CC and the mutual information (MI) analyses statistically agree with each other, with p‐values of 1.675 × 10−7 and 4.833 × 10−9, with the confidence of 95%. Both the results based on MI and CC have a large deviation from the results from MVAB. For some of the events, such a deviation could be improved by taking the fast mode speed into account; however, p‐tests showed that they were not statistically significant to the 95% confidence level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信