需要进一步澄清：为什么 Jetschke 等人（2023 年）低估了经偏差调整的标准化生长变化对指针年检测的功效？

IF 2.7 3区农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY

Dendrochronologia Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.dendro.2024.126240

Allan Buras

{"title":"需要进一步澄清：为什么 Jetschke 等人（2023 年）低估了经偏差调整的标准化生长变化对指针年检测的功效？","authors":"Allan Buras","doi":"10.1016/j.dendro.2024.126240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a recent communication, Jetschke et al. (2023) compared various pointer-year detection methods against the recently published (bias-adjusted) standardized growth change method (SGC and BSGC, Buras et al., 2020, 2022). Based on their comparative evaluation, Jetschke et al. (2023) pointed out specific weaknesses of the (B)SGC methods. In this short communication, I reveal their analyses to be erroneous and consequently their conclusions to be based on false grounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50595,"journal":{"name":"Dendrochronologia","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 126240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786524000778/pdfft?md5=5e14c4eb76e62dd57b3682d7d4cff37c&pid=1-s2.0-S1125786524000778-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further clarifications needed: Why Jetschke et al. (2023) underestimated the efficacy of bias-adjusted, standardized growth changes for pointer-year detection\",\"authors\":\"Allan Buras\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dendro.2024.126240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In a recent communication, Jetschke et al. (2023) compared various pointer-year detection methods against the recently published (bias-adjusted) standardized growth change method (SGC and BSGC, Buras et al., 2020, 2022). Based on their comparative evaluation, Jetschke et al. (2023) pointed out specific weaknesses of the (B)SGC methods. In this short communication, I reveal their analyses to be erroneous and consequently their conclusions to be based on false grounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dendrochronologia\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786524000778/pdfft?md5=5e14c4eb76e62dd57b3682d7d4cff37c&pid=1-s2.0-S1125786524000778-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dendrochronologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786524000778\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dendrochronologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786524000778","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在最近的一篇通讯中，Jetschke 等人（2023 年）将各种指针年检测方法与最近发表的（偏差调整）标准化生长变化方法（SGC 和 BSGC，Buras 等人，2020 年，2022 年）进行了比较。根据他们的比较评估，Jetschke 等人（2023 年）指出了 (B)SGC 方法的具体弱点。在这篇短文中，我将揭示他们的分析是错误的，因此他们的结论是建立在错误的基础之上的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Further clarifications needed: Why Jetschke et al. (2023) underestimated the efficacy of bias-adjusted, standardized growth changes for pointer-year detection

In a recent communication, Jetschke et al. (2023) compared various pointer-year detection methods against the recently published (bias-adjusted) standardized growth change method (SGC and BSGC, Buras et al., 2020, 2022). Based on their comparative evaluation, Jetschke et al. (2023) pointed out specific weaknesses of the (B)SGC methods. In this short communication, I reveal their analyses to be erroneous and consequently their conclusions to be based on false grounds.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dendrochronologia FORESTRY-GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

13.30%

发文量

审稿时长

22.8 weeks

期刊介绍： Dendrochronologia is a peer-reviewed international scholarly journal that presents high-quality research related to growth rings of woody plants, i.e., trees and shrubs, and the application of tree-ring studies. The areas covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: Archaeology Botany Climatology Ecology Forestry Geology Hydrology Original research articles, reviews, communications, technical notes and personal notes are considered for publication.