Elizabeth Kvach, Ryan O’Connell, S. Sairafi, Krystyna Holland, Nancy Wittmer
{"title":"美国县级安全网系统中变性和非二元患者进行性别确认阴道成形术后的扩张结果","authors":"Elizabeth Kvach, Ryan O’Connell, S. Sairafi, Krystyna Holland, Nancy Wittmer","doi":"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The study purpose was to report neovaginal dilation outcomes and identify factors associated with pain, dilation discontinuation, and sexual function for transgender individuals who underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty.\n \n \n \n A retrospective cohort study design was employed of transgender patients 18 years or older undergoing full-depth vaginoplasty and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) between May 2018 and April 2021 at a safety-net hospital through medical record review and an online survey developed with a patient advisory board. Exclusion criterion was minimal-depth vaginoplasty or loss to follow-up.\n \n \n \n In total, 137 patients included underwent full-depth vaginoplasty (46.7% survey response rate) 796.2 days (mean) postoperatively. Patients received 4.3 PFPT visits, with the last visit 12.4 weeks postoperatively (mean). Ninety patients (64.3%) achieved the 2 widest dilators, and 68 patients dilated to a depth of 5.5 inches or more (49.6%). The mean progression time between dilators was 5 weeks. Twenty-nine patients (21.2%) had pain preventing dilation, associated with minor or any surgical complication (OR = 5.7; 95% CI, 1.3-25.0) and posttraumatic stress disorder (P = .01), and had more PFPT visits for longer postoperatively than those without pain (P = .03). Nineteen respondents (32.2%) reported not dilating and were younger (P = .02), more likely to be lesbian, pansexual, or asexual (P = .01), and experienced depression (P = .01). Forty-four respondents (77.2%) were sexually active in the past 6 months, which was not associated with pain during dilation. However, respondents self-reporting dilation pain had greater dissatisfaction with their sex life (P = .02).\n \n \n \n Patient dilation practices following vaginoplasty differ from protocols recommended by surgeons. Dilation goals should be adapted to individual patient characteristics and needs.\n","PeriodicalId":518889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","volume":"9 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dilation Outcomes for Transgender and Nonbinary Patients Following Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty in a US County Safety-Net System\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Kvach, Ryan O’Connell, S. Sairafi, Krystyna Holland, Nancy Wittmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The study purpose was to report neovaginal dilation outcomes and identify factors associated with pain, dilation discontinuation, and sexual function for transgender individuals who underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty.\\n \\n \\n \\n A retrospective cohort study design was employed of transgender patients 18 years or older undergoing full-depth vaginoplasty and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) between May 2018 and April 2021 at a safety-net hospital through medical record review and an online survey developed with a patient advisory board. Exclusion criterion was minimal-depth vaginoplasty or loss to follow-up.\\n \\n \\n \\n In total, 137 patients included underwent full-depth vaginoplasty (46.7% survey response rate) 796.2 days (mean) postoperatively. Patients received 4.3 PFPT visits, with the last visit 12.4 weeks postoperatively (mean). Ninety patients (64.3%) achieved the 2 widest dilators, and 68 patients dilated to a depth of 5.5 inches or more (49.6%). The mean progression time between dilators was 5 weeks. Twenty-nine patients (21.2%) had pain preventing dilation, associated with minor or any surgical complication (OR = 5.7; 95% CI, 1.3-25.0) and posttraumatic stress disorder (P = .01), and had more PFPT visits for longer postoperatively than those without pain (P = .03). Nineteen respondents (32.2%) reported not dilating and were younger (P = .02), more likely to be lesbian, pansexual, or asexual (P = .01), and experienced depression (P = .01). Forty-four respondents (77.2%) were sexually active in the past 6 months, which was not associated with pain during dilation. However, respondents self-reporting dilation pain had greater dissatisfaction with their sex life (P = .02).\\n \\n \\n \\n Patient dilation practices following vaginoplasty differ from protocols recommended by surgeons. Dilation goals should be adapted to individual patient characteristics and needs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":518889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"9 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dilation Outcomes for Transgender and Nonbinary Patients Following Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty in a US County Safety-Net System
The study purpose was to report neovaginal dilation outcomes and identify factors associated with pain, dilation discontinuation, and sexual function for transgender individuals who underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty.
A retrospective cohort study design was employed of transgender patients 18 years or older undergoing full-depth vaginoplasty and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) between May 2018 and April 2021 at a safety-net hospital through medical record review and an online survey developed with a patient advisory board. Exclusion criterion was minimal-depth vaginoplasty or loss to follow-up.
In total, 137 patients included underwent full-depth vaginoplasty (46.7% survey response rate) 796.2 days (mean) postoperatively. Patients received 4.3 PFPT visits, with the last visit 12.4 weeks postoperatively (mean). Ninety patients (64.3%) achieved the 2 widest dilators, and 68 patients dilated to a depth of 5.5 inches or more (49.6%). The mean progression time between dilators was 5 weeks. Twenty-nine patients (21.2%) had pain preventing dilation, associated with minor or any surgical complication (OR = 5.7; 95% CI, 1.3-25.0) and posttraumatic stress disorder (P = .01), and had more PFPT visits for longer postoperatively than those without pain (P = .03). Nineteen respondents (32.2%) reported not dilating and were younger (P = .02), more likely to be lesbian, pansexual, or asexual (P = .01), and experienced depression (P = .01). Forty-four respondents (77.2%) were sexually active in the past 6 months, which was not associated with pain during dilation. However, respondents self-reporting dilation pain had greater dissatisfaction with their sex life (P = .02).
Patient dilation practices following vaginoplasty differ from protocols recommended by surgeons. Dilation goals should be adapted to individual patient characteristics and needs.