导管脱落

Peyton Mashni BS , Clare Savage MD , Michael Jax BS , Anna Maria Reiter BS , Gordon Butler MD , Joseph B. Zwischenberger MD
{"title":"导管脱落","authors":"Peyton Mashni BS ,&nbsp;Clare Savage MD ,&nbsp;Michael Jax BS ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Reiter BS ,&nbsp;Gordon Butler MD ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Zwischenberger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accidental catheter removal or drain dislodgment, including tube thoracostomy, is a common, high-risk complication in hospitalized and ambulatory patients that often necessitates an additional procedure, increased length of stay, and increased cost.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the tensile strength of pigtail catheter fixation using a simple interrupted suture, a U-stitch suture, or 2 simple interrupted skin sutures in a standardized skin model. Catheters were sutured to the skin, penetrating the collagen layer, with 1 of the 3 suture techniques and varying suture combinations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For each trial, breakage occurred at the suture or knot. The mean breakpoint varied significantly between 2 simple interrupted sutures and both the 1 simple interrupted suture and the U-stitch technique (analysis of variance post hoc test <em>P</em> &lt; .001), with the 2 simple interrupted suture technique withholding nearly 40% more force. Using the strongest suture, 0 silk, on a deceased adult sheep to secure a pigtail thoracostomy catheter yielded identical data compared with the standardized skin model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, 2 simple interrupted skin sutures to secure a pigtail catheter has very low risk with a strongly positive benefit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Catheter Fell Out\",\"authors\":\"Peyton Mashni BS ,&nbsp;Clare Savage MD ,&nbsp;Michael Jax BS ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Reiter BS ,&nbsp;Gordon Butler MD ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Zwischenberger MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accidental catheter removal or drain dislodgment, including tube thoracostomy, is a common, high-risk complication in hospitalized and ambulatory patients that often necessitates an additional procedure, increased length of stay, and increased cost.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the tensile strength of pigtail catheter fixation using a simple interrupted suture, a U-stitch suture, or 2 simple interrupted skin sutures in a standardized skin model. Catheters were sutured to the skin, penetrating the collagen layer, with 1 of the 3 suture techniques and varying suture combinations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For each trial, breakage occurred at the suture or knot. The mean breakpoint varied significantly between 2 simple interrupted sutures and both the 1 simple interrupted suture and the U-stitch technique (analysis of variance post hoc test <em>P</em> &lt; .001), with the 2 simple interrupted suture technique withholding nearly 40% more force. Using the strongest suture, 0 silk, on a deceased adult sheep to secure a pigtail thoracostomy catheter yielded identical data compared with the standardized skin model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, 2 simple interrupted skin sutures to secure a pigtail catheter has very low risk with a strongly positive benefit.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 281-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124003218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124003218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Catheter Fell Out

Background

Accidental catheter removal or drain dislodgment, including tube thoracostomy, is a common, high-risk complication in hospitalized and ambulatory patients that often necessitates an additional procedure, increased length of stay, and increased cost.

Methods

The aim of this study was to compare the tensile strength of pigtail catheter fixation using a simple interrupted suture, a U-stitch suture, or 2 simple interrupted skin sutures in a standardized skin model. Catheters were sutured to the skin, penetrating the collagen layer, with 1 of the 3 suture techniques and varying suture combinations.

Results

For each trial, breakage occurred at the suture or knot. The mean breakpoint varied significantly between 2 simple interrupted sutures and both the 1 simple interrupted suture and the U-stitch technique (analysis of variance post hoc test P < .001), with the 2 simple interrupted suture technique withholding nearly 40% more force. Using the strongest suture, 0 silk, on a deceased adult sheep to secure a pigtail thoracostomy catheter yielded identical data compared with the standardized skin model.

Conclusions

In conclusion, 2 simple interrupted skin sutures to secure a pigtail catheter has very low risk with a strongly positive benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信