{"title":"使用 FEV1 与 TLC 测量限制性肺病的严重程度","authors":"Rebeca Vazquez-Nieves","doi":"10.12788/fp.0481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: No clear parameters currently exist to grade severity in restrictive lung disease as for other ventilatory diseases. This article evaluates whether total lung capacity (TLC) or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) better correlates with the symptomatology of patients with restrictive lung disease. Methods: A retrospective review of 6461 patient records at Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System in Puerto Rico was conducted, and 414 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pulmonary function test, Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, FEV 1 , and TLC data were collected for each patient. Results: We identified a stronger correlation between FEV 1 ( r = 0.25, P < .001) vs TLC ( r = 0.15, P < .001) when related to the degree of dyspnea as measured with the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale. Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that compared with TLC, FEV 1 may provide a more accurate measure of restrictive lung disease severity. Further research should look for more accurate measures of patient dyspnea in restrictive lung disease.","PeriodicalId":513268,"journal":{"name":"Federal Practitioner","volume":"62 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Restrictive Lung Disease Severity Using FEV1 vs TLC\",\"authors\":\"Rebeca Vazquez-Nieves\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: No clear parameters currently exist to grade severity in restrictive lung disease as for other ventilatory diseases. This article evaluates whether total lung capacity (TLC) or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) better correlates with the symptomatology of patients with restrictive lung disease. Methods: A retrospective review of 6461 patient records at Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System in Puerto Rico was conducted, and 414 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pulmonary function test, Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, FEV 1 , and TLC data were collected for each patient. Results: We identified a stronger correlation between FEV 1 ( r = 0.25, P < .001) vs TLC ( r = 0.15, P < .001) when related to the degree of dyspnea as measured with the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale. Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that compared with TLC, FEV 1 may provide a more accurate measure of restrictive lung disease severity. Further research should look for more accurate measures of patient dyspnea in restrictive lung disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal Practitioner\",\"volume\":\"62 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal Practitioner\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Practitioner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:与其他通气疾病一样,目前尚无明确的参数可对限制性肺疾病的严重程度进行分级。本文评估了总肺活量(TLC)或一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV 1)是否与限制性肺疾病患者的症状有更好的相关性。研究方法对波多黎各退伍军人事务加勒比医疗保健系统的 6461 份病历进行了回顾性审查,414 名患者符合纳入标准。收集了每位患者的肺功能测试、改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表、FEV 1 和 TLC 数据。结果:我们发现,FEV 1 ( r = 0.25, P < .001) 与 TLC ( r = 0.15, P < .001) 与改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale)测量的呼吸困难程度之间存在更强的相关性。结论:本研究结果表明,与 TLC 相比,FEV 1 可以更准确地测量限制性肺病的严重程度。进一步的研究应寻找限制性肺病患者呼吸困难的更准确测量方法。
Measuring Restrictive Lung Disease Severity Using FEV1 vs TLC
Background: No clear parameters currently exist to grade severity in restrictive lung disease as for other ventilatory diseases. This article evaluates whether total lung capacity (TLC) or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) better correlates with the symptomatology of patients with restrictive lung disease. Methods: A retrospective review of 6461 patient records at Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System in Puerto Rico was conducted, and 414 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pulmonary function test, Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, FEV 1 , and TLC data were collected for each patient. Results: We identified a stronger correlation between FEV 1 ( r = 0.25, P < .001) vs TLC ( r = 0.15, P < .001) when related to the degree of dyspnea as measured with the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale. Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that compared with TLC, FEV 1 may provide a more accurate measure of restrictive lung disease severity. Further research should look for more accurate measures of patient dyspnea in restrictive lung disease.