放射诱导的淋巴细胞减少症是食道癌化放疗后生存率的一个因果中介因素

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yiqing Chen MSc , Yan Chu PhD , Peter S.N. van Rossum MD, PhD , Clemens Grassberger PhD , Steven H. Lin MD, PhD , Radhe Mohan PhD , Brian P. Hobbs PhD
{"title":"放射诱导的淋巴细胞减少症是食道癌化放疗后生存率的一个因果中介因素","authors":"Yiqing Chen MSc ,&nbsp;Yan Chu PhD ,&nbsp;Peter S.N. van Rossum MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Clemens Grassberger PhD ,&nbsp;Steven H. Lin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Radhe Mohan PhD ,&nbsp;Brian P. Hobbs PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is common during chemoradiation therapy. Severe lymphopenia is associated with reduced survival. Proton beam therapy (PBT), with its substantially more compact dose distributions, spares circulating lymphocytes and immune organs at risk to a greater extent than photon therapy. Recent studies comparing PBT to photon radiation therapy, specifically intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for esophageal cancer (EC), showed that the incidence of grade 4 RIL (G4RIL) is significantly reduced among patients receiving PBT for EC. However, whether the extent of this reduction has a direct causative link with improved survival is unknown. This study applies causal mediation analysis to answer this question.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We retrospectively assessed 734 patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy for biopsy-proven EC from 2004 to 2017. To address the potential for bias in the choice of radiation modality, propensity score analysis was used to evaluate and reduce imbalances between the PBT and IMRT cohorts. Causal mediation analysis was applied to decompose the total effect of radiation modality on overall survival (OS) into indirect (mediated through G4RIL) and direct effects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that PBT was associated with a significantly lower incidence of G4RIL and prolonged OS compared with IMRT (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.60; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). In the propensity-matched cohort of 506 patients (253 PBT, 253 IMRT), G4RIL risk reduction with PBT versus IMRT translated into a 5% reduction in the relative rate of death (<em>P</em> = .032). Mediation of G4RIL explained ∼14.5% of the difference in OS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>G4RIL was found to mediate survival; however, a statistically significant direct effect of PBT on survival was not observed. In other words, the statistical significance of survival benefit from protons over photons in this EC cohort was lost in the absence of G4RIL risk reduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 101579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001428/pdfft?md5=8700e3d1bb3a630172295360a8a952bf&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001428-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia is a Causal Mediator of Survival After Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophagus Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Yiqing Chen MSc ,&nbsp;Yan Chu PhD ,&nbsp;Peter S.N. van Rossum MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Clemens Grassberger PhD ,&nbsp;Steven H. Lin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Radhe Mohan PhD ,&nbsp;Brian P. Hobbs PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is common during chemoradiation therapy. Severe lymphopenia is associated with reduced survival. Proton beam therapy (PBT), with its substantially more compact dose distributions, spares circulating lymphocytes and immune organs at risk to a greater extent than photon therapy. Recent studies comparing PBT to photon radiation therapy, specifically intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for esophageal cancer (EC), showed that the incidence of grade 4 RIL (G4RIL) is significantly reduced among patients receiving PBT for EC. However, whether the extent of this reduction has a direct causative link with improved survival is unknown. This study applies causal mediation analysis to answer this question.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We retrospectively assessed 734 patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy for biopsy-proven EC from 2004 to 2017. To address the potential for bias in the choice of radiation modality, propensity score analysis was used to evaluate and reduce imbalances between the PBT and IMRT cohorts. Causal mediation analysis was applied to decompose the total effect of radiation modality on overall survival (OS) into indirect (mediated through G4RIL) and direct effects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that PBT was associated with a significantly lower incidence of G4RIL and prolonged OS compared with IMRT (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.60; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). In the propensity-matched cohort of 506 patients (253 PBT, 253 IMRT), G4RIL risk reduction with PBT versus IMRT translated into a 5% reduction in the relative rate of death (<em>P</em> = .032). Mediation of G4RIL explained ∼14.5% of the difference in OS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>G4RIL was found to mediate survival; however, a statistically significant direct effect of PBT on survival was not observed. In other words, the statistical significance of survival benefit from protons over photons in this EC cohort was lost in the absence of G4RIL risk reduction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001428/pdfft?md5=8700e3d1bb3a630172295360a8a952bf&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001428-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的放疗诱导的淋巴细胞减少症(RIL)在化疗期间很常见。严重的淋巴细胞减少与生存率降低有关。质子束疗法(PBT)的剂量分布更为紧凑,与光子疗法相比,它能在更大程度上避免循环淋巴细胞和免疫器官遭受风险。最近的研究比较了质子束疗法和光子放射疗法,特别是针对食管癌(EC)的调强放射疗法(IMRT),结果表明,接受质子束疗法治疗食管癌的患者中,4级RIL(G4RIL)的发生率明显降低。然而,这种降低的程度是否与生存率的提高有直接的因果关系尚不清楚。本研究采用因果中介分析法来回答这一问题。方法和材料我们回顾性评估了2004年至2017年接受同期化放疗治疗的734例活检证实EC患者。为了解决放射模式选择中可能存在的偏倚,我们使用倾向评分分析来评估和减少PBT和IMRT队列之间的不平衡。结果我们发现,与 IMRT 相比,PBT 与 G4RIL 发生率显著降低和 OS 延长相关(几率比 0.41;95% CI,0.28-0.60;P < .001)。在 506 例患者(253 例 PBT,253 例 IMRT)的倾向匹配队列中,PBT 与 IMRT 相比,G4RIL 风险降低了 5%,相对死亡率降低了 5%(P = .032)。结论发现 G4RIL 对生存有中介作用;但是,没有观察到 PBT 对生存有统计学意义的直接影响。换句话说,在这个欧共体队列中,质子比光子对生存的益处在统计学上的意义因 G4RIL 风险降低而丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia is a Causal Mediator of Survival After Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophagus Cancer

Purpose

Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is common during chemoradiation therapy. Severe lymphopenia is associated with reduced survival. Proton beam therapy (PBT), with its substantially more compact dose distributions, spares circulating lymphocytes and immune organs at risk to a greater extent than photon therapy. Recent studies comparing PBT to photon radiation therapy, specifically intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for esophageal cancer (EC), showed that the incidence of grade 4 RIL (G4RIL) is significantly reduced among patients receiving PBT for EC. However, whether the extent of this reduction has a direct causative link with improved survival is unknown. This study applies causal mediation analysis to answer this question.

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively assessed 734 patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy for biopsy-proven EC from 2004 to 2017. To address the potential for bias in the choice of radiation modality, propensity score analysis was used to evaluate and reduce imbalances between the PBT and IMRT cohorts. Causal mediation analysis was applied to decompose the total effect of radiation modality on overall survival (OS) into indirect (mediated through G4RIL) and direct effects.

Results

We found that PBT was associated with a significantly lower incidence of G4RIL and prolonged OS compared with IMRT (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.60; P < .001). In the propensity-matched cohort of 506 patients (253 PBT, 253 IMRT), G4RIL risk reduction with PBT versus IMRT translated into a 5% reduction in the relative rate of death (P = .032). Mediation of G4RIL explained ∼14.5% of the difference in OS.

Conclusions

G4RIL was found to mediate survival; however, a statistically significant direct effect of PBT on survival was not observed. In other words, the statistical significance of survival benefit from protons over photons in this EC cohort was lost in the absence of G4RIL risk reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信