比较因果随机森林和线性回归来估算组织因素与重症监护室效率的独立联系

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Leonardo S.L. Bastos , Safira A. Wortel , Ferishta Bakhshi-Raiez , Ameen Abu-Hanna , Dave A. Dongelmans , Jorge I.F. Salluh , Fernando G. Zampieri , Gastón Burghi , Silvio Hamacher , Fernando A. Bozza , Nicolette F. de Keizer , Marcio Soares
{"title":"比较因果随机森林和线性回归来估算组织因素与重症监护室效率的独立联系","authors":"Leonardo S.L. Bastos ,&nbsp;Safira A. Wortel ,&nbsp;Ferishta Bakhshi-Raiez ,&nbsp;Ameen Abu-Hanna ,&nbsp;Dave A. Dongelmans ,&nbsp;Jorge I.F. Salluh ,&nbsp;Fernando G. Zampieri ,&nbsp;Gastón Burghi ,&nbsp;Silvio Hamacher ,&nbsp;Fernando A. Bozza ,&nbsp;Nicolette F. de Keizer ,&nbsp;Marcio Soares","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Parametric regression models have been the main statistical method for identifying average treatment effects. Causal machine learning models showed promising results in estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in causal inference. Here we aimed to compare the application of causal random forest (CRF) and linear regression modelling (LRM) to estimate the effects of organisational factors on ICU efficiency.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of 277,459 patients admitted to 128 Brazilian and Uruguayan ICUs over three years. ICU efficiency was assessed using the average standardised efficiency ratio (ASER), measured as the average of the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) and the standardised resource use (SRU) according to the SAPS-3 score. Using a causal inference framework, we estimated and compared the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) of seven common structural and organisational factors on ICU efficiency using LRM with interaction terms and CRF.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The hospital mortality was 14 %; median ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 2 and 7 days, respectively. Overall median SMR was 0.97 [IQR: 0.76,1.21], median SRU was 1.06 [IQR: 0.79,1.30] and median ASER was 0.99 [IQR: 0.82,1.21]. Both CRF and LRM showed that the average number of nurses per ten beds was independently associated with ICU efficiency (CATE [95 %CI]: −0.13 [-0.24, −0.01] and −0.09 [-0.17,-0.01], respectively). Finally, CRF identified some specific ICUs with a significant CATE in exposures that did not present a significant average effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In general, both methods were comparable to identify organisational factors significantly associated with CATE on ICU efficiency. CRF however identified specific ICUs with significant effects, even when the average effect was nonsignificant. This can assist healthcare managers in further in-dept evaluation of process interventions to improve ICU efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing causal random forest and linear regression to estimate the independent association of organisational factors with ICU efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo S.L. Bastos ,&nbsp;Safira A. Wortel ,&nbsp;Ferishta Bakhshi-Raiez ,&nbsp;Ameen Abu-Hanna ,&nbsp;Dave A. Dongelmans ,&nbsp;Jorge I.F. Salluh ,&nbsp;Fernando G. Zampieri ,&nbsp;Gastón Burghi ,&nbsp;Silvio Hamacher ,&nbsp;Fernando A. Bozza ,&nbsp;Nicolette F. de Keizer ,&nbsp;Marcio Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Parametric regression models have been the main statistical method for identifying average treatment effects. Causal machine learning models showed promising results in estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in causal inference. Here we aimed to compare the application of causal random forest (CRF) and linear regression modelling (LRM) to estimate the effects of organisational factors on ICU efficiency.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of 277,459 patients admitted to 128 Brazilian and Uruguayan ICUs over three years. ICU efficiency was assessed using the average standardised efficiency ratio (ASER), measured as the average of the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) and the standardised resource use (SRU) according to the SAPS-3 score. Using a causal inference framework, we estimated and compared the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) of seven common structural and organisational factors on ICU efficiency using LRM with interaction terms and CRF.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The hospital mortality was 14 %; median ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 2 and 7 days, respectively. Overall median SMR was 0.97 [IQR: 0.76,1.21], median SRU was 1.06 [IQR: 0.79,1.30] and median ASER was 0.99 [IQR: 0.82,1.21]. Both CRF and LRM showed that the average number of nurses per ten beds was independently associated with ICU efficiency (CATE [95 %CI]: −0.13 [-0.24, −0.01] and −0.09 [-0.17,-0.01], respectively). Finally, CRF identified some specific ICUs with a significant CATE in exposures that did not present a significant average effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In general, both methods were comparable to identify organisational factors significantly associated with CATE on ICU efficiency. CRF however identified specific ICUs with significant effects, even when the average effect was nonsignificant. This can assist healthcare managers in further in-dept evaluation of process interventions to improve ICU efficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624002314\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624002314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的参数回归模型一直是确定平均治疗效果的主要统计方法。在因果推理中,因果机器学习模型在估计异质性治疗效果方面显示出了良好的效果。在此,我们旨在比较因果随机森林(CRF)和线性回归模型(LRM)的应用,以估计组织因素对重症监护室效率的影响。重症监护室的效率采用平均标准化效率比(ASER)进行评估,ASER是根据SAPS-3评分得出的标准化死亡率(SMR)和标准化资源使用率(SRU)的平均值。利用因果推理框架,我们使用带交互项的 LRM 和 CRF 估算并比较了七个常见结构和组织因素对 ICU 效率的条件平均治疗效果(CATE)。总体中位 SMR 为 0.97 [IQR: 0.76,1.21],中位 SRU 为 1.06 [IQR: 0.79,1.30],中位 ASER 为 0.99 [IQR: 0.82,1.21]。CRF和LRM均显示,每10张病床的平均护士人数与ICU效率独立相关(CATE [95 %CI]:分别为-0.13 [-0.24, -0.01]和-0.09 [-0.17,-0.01])。最后,CRF 确定了一些特定的 ICU,这些 ICU 在暴露方面具有显著的 CATE,但平均效应并不显著。然而,CRF 能识别出具有显著效果的特定 ICU,即使平均效果并不显著。这有助于医疗管理人员进一步深入评估流程干预措施,以提高重症监护室的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing causal random forest and linear regression to estimate the independent association of organisational factors with ICU efficiency

Purpose

Parametric regression models have been the main statistical method for identifying average treatment effects. Causal machine learning models showed promising results in estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in causal inference. Here we aimed to compare the application of causal random forest (CRF) and linear regression modelling (LRM) to estimate the effects of organisational factors on ICU efficiency.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 277,459 patients admitted to 128 Brazilian and Uruguayan ICUs over three years. ICU efficiency was assessed using the average standardised efficiency ratio (ASER), measured as the average of the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) and the standardised resource use (SRU) according to the SAPS-3 score. Using a causal inference framework, we estimated and compared the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) of seven common structural and organisational factors on ICU efficiency using LRM with interaction terms and CRF.

Results

The hospital mortality was 14 %; median ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 2 and 7 days, respectively. Overall median SMR was 0.97 [IQR: 0.76,1.21], median SRU was 1.06 [IQR: 0.79,1.30] and median ASER was 0.99 [IQR: 0.82,1.21]. Both CRF and LRM showed that the average number of nurses per ten beds was independently associated with ICU efficiency (CATE [95 %CI]: −0.13 [-0.24, −0.01] and −0.09 [-0.17,-0.01], respectively). Finally, CRF identified some specific ICUs with a significant CATE in exposures that did not present a significant average effect.

Conclusion

In general, both methods were comparable to identify organisational factors significantly associated with CATE on ICU efficiency. CRF however identified specific ICUs with significant effects, even when the average effect was nonsignificant. This can assist healthcare managers in further in-dept evaluation of process interventions to improve ICU efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信