利用合成孔径雷达和光学遥感数据的协同作用估算不同生长阶段的作物产量。

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Natacha I. Kalecinski , Sergii Skakun , Nathan Torbick , Xiaodong Huang , Belen Franch , Jean-Claude Roger , Eric Vermote
{"title":"利用合成孔径雷达和光学遥感数据的协同作用估算不同生长阶段的作物产量。","authors":"Natacha I. Kalecinski ,&nbsp;Sergii Skakun ,&nbsp;Nathan Torbick ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Huang ,&nbsp;Belen Franch ,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Roger ,&nbsp;Eric Vermote","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Crop yield forecasting is an essential component of crop production assessment, impacting people at the global scale down to the level of individual farms. Until now, yield forecasting has predominantly relied on optical data, particularly the maximum value of vegetation indexes. However, this approach only presents a short forecasting window, and it is essential to obtain yield estimates as early as possible in the growing season and then further improve forecasting even after the vegetation index has reached its peak. So far, optical satellite data at high-temporal resolution (1–3 days) has been actively used for real time crop yield monitoring, whereas fewer operational models make a use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR). In this study, we explore whether SAR data can capture distinct aspects of crop dynamics, providing new insights for yield estimation depending on the crop's phenological stage. We assess the efficiency of dual- (Sentinel-1) and quad-polarimetric (UAVSAR, RADARSAT-2) data to explain inter-field crop yield variability for corn, soybean, and rice over a test area in Arkansas, US (258 fields, 2019). We used optical imagery acquired by Planet/Dove-Classic, Sentinel-2, and Landsat 8, to establish a baseline performance of satellite-based indicators to explain yield variability and assess dual- and quad-polarimetric SAR data for crop yield assessment. In terms of polarimetric indexes, the results showed that in general the results for rice were mostly stable and better than the other crops (R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> ∼ 0.4 on average). The best results were obtained for the Sentinel-1 VH<sub>asc</sub> with R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> = 0.47 and RADARSAT-2 phase difference with R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> = 0.45. The results for corn performed the least with an R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> &lt;0.35 for all the indexes. The results for soybeans were more variable and were highly correlated with certain indicators such as RADARSAT-2 HV, RADARSAT-2 Volume, and RADARSAT-2 Pauli HV with R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub>&gt;0.4. We also investigated the day of year (DOY) with the maximum correlation between optical and SAR-derived features and the final yields for corn, soybean, and rice. The maximum correlation for optical features occurs over a short time between DOY 155 (June 4) and 185 (July 5) for corn and rice, and DOY 190 (July 9) and DOY 211 (July 30) for soybean, with these results being consistent across various optical-based sensors. On the contrary, the maximum correlation for SAR-derived features varied significantly and was between DOY 120 (April 30) to DOY 225 (August 13). A study of the time series parameters cross-correlation showed that the optical parameters were highly correlated, but the SAR parameters showed strong temporal decorrelation. We conducted a comparison between C-band and L-band to assess their sensitivity at each stage of growth. In this experiment, we determined that for low vegetation, the C band will be more useful at the beginning of the growth cycle, while the L band provides more information in later stages of growth. Using a random forest regression model combining SAR parameters with common difference vegetation index (DVI), we improved the error by 50% in comparison to the error using the (DVI) for corn, soybean, and rice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000373/pdfft?md5=8094bda8c58d9c01f3e5b0c68ccff1c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000373-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crop yield estimation at different growing stages using a synergy of SAR and optical remote sensing data\",\"authors\":\"Natacha I. Kalecinski ,&nbsp;Sergii Skakun ,&nbsp;Nathan Torbick ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Huang ,&nbsp;Belen Franch ,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Roger ,&nbsp;Eric Vermote\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Crop yield forecasting is an essential component of crop production assessment, impacting people at the global scale down to the level of individual farms. Until now, yield forecasting has predominantly relied on optical data, particularly the maximum value of vegetation indexes. However, this approach only presents a short forecasting window, and it is essential to obtain yield estimates as early as possible in the growing season and then further improve forecasting even after the vegetation index has reached its peak. So far, optical satellite data at high-temporal resolution (1–3 days) has been actively used for real time crop yield monitoring, whereas fewer operational models make a use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR). In this study, we explore whether SAR data can capture distinct aspects of crop dynamics, providing new insights for yield estimation depending on the crop's phenological stage. We assess the efficiency of dual- (Sentinel-1) and quad-polarimetric (UAVSAR, RADARSAT-2) data to explain inter-field crop yield variability for corn, soybean, and rice over a test area in Arkansas, US (258 fields, 2019). We used optical imagery acquired by Planet/Dove-Classic, Sentinel-2, and Landsat 8, to establish a baseline performance of satellite-based indicators to explain yield variability and assess dual- and quad-polarimetric SAR data for crop yield assessment. In terms of polarimetric indexes, the results showed that in general the results for rice were mostly stable and better than the other crops (R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> ∼ 0.4 on average). The best results were obtained for the Sentinel-1 VH<sub>asc</sub> with R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> = 0.47 and RADARSAT-2 phase difference with R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> = 0.45. The results for corn performed the least with an R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> &lt;0.35 for all the indexes. The results for soybeans were more variable and were highly correlated with certain indicators such as RADARSAT-2 HV, RADARSAT-2 Volume, and RADARSAT-2 Pauli HV with R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub>&gt;0.4. We also investigated the day of year (DOY) with the maximum correlation between optical and SAR-derived features and the final yields for corn, soybean, and rice. The maximum correlation for optical features occurs over a short time between DOY 155 (June 4) and 185 (July 5) for corn and rice, and DOY 190 (July 9) and DOY 211 (July 30) for soybean, with these results being consistent across various optical-based sensors. On the contrary, the maximum correlation for SAR-derived features varied significantly and was between DOY 120 (April 30) to DOY 225 (August 13). A study of the time series parameters cross-correlation showed that the optical parameters were highly correlated, but the SAR parameters showed strong temporal decorrelation. We conducted a comparison between C-band and L-band to assess their sensitivity at each stage of growth. In this experiment, we determined that for low vegetation, the C band will be more useful at the beginning of the growth cycle, while the L band provides more information in later stages of growth. Using a random forest regression model combining SAR parameters with common difference vegetation index (DVI), we improved the error by 50% in comparison to the error using the (DVI) for corn, soybean, and rice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000373/pdfft?md5=8094bda8c58d9c01f3e5b0c68ccff1c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000373-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作物产量预报是作物产量评估的重要组成部分,对全球乃至单个农场都有影响。迄今为止,产量预测主要依靠光学数据,特别是植被指数的最大值。然而,这种方法只能提供较短的预报窗口,因此必须在生长季节尽早获得产量估算,然后在植被指数达到最高值后进一步改进预报。迄今为止,高时间分辨率(1-3 天)的光学卫星数据已被积极用于实时作物产量监测,而使用合成孔径雷达(SAR)的业务模型则较少。在本研究中,我们探讨了合成孔径雷达数据能否捕捉作物动态的不同方面,从而根据作物的物候期为产量估算提供新的见解。我们评估了双极性(哨兵-1)和四极性(无人机合成孔径雷达、RADARSAT-2)数据在解释美国阿肯色州试验区(258 块田地,2019 年)玉米、大豆和水稻的田间作物产量变化方面的效率。我们利用Planet/Dove-Classic、Sentinel-2和Landsat 8获取的光学图像,建立了基于卫星的指标解释产量变异的基线性能,并评估了用于作物产量评估的双极坐标和四极坐标合成孔径雷达数据。在极坐标指标方面,结果表明,总体而言,水稻的结果基本稳定,且优于其他作物(R2adj ∼ 0.4)。Sentinel-1 VHasc 的结果最好,R2adj = 0.47,RADARSAT-2 相位差的结果最好,R2adj = 0.45。玉米的结果最差,所有指数的 R2adj 均为 0.35。大豆的结果变化较大,与某些指标高度相关,如 RADARSAT-2 HV、RADARSAT-2 Volume 和 RADARSAT-2 Pauli HV,R2adj>0.4。我们还研究了光学特征和合成孔径雷达衍生特征与玉米、大豆和水稻最终产量之间相关性最大的年份(DOY)。光学特征的最大相关性出现在玉米和水稻的第 155 个昼夜(6 月 4 日)和第 185 个昼夜(7 月 5 日)之间的短时间内,以及大豆的第 190 个昼夜(7 月 9 日)和第 211 个昼夜(7 月 30 日)之间,这些结果在各种基于光学的传感器中是一致的。相反,合成孔径雷达(SAR)衍生特征的最大相关性变化很大,在倒数第二个十年 120 日(4 月 30 日)至倒数第二个十年 225 日(8 月 13 日)之间。对时间序列参数交叉相关性的研究表明,光学参数高度相关,但合成孔径雷达参数则表现出很强的时间非相关性。我们对 C 波段和 L 波段进行了比较,以评估它们在每个生长阶段的灵敏度。在这项实验中,我们确定对于低植被而言,C 波段在生长周期的初期更有用,而 L 波段则能在生长后期提供更多信息。使用随机森林回归模型,结合合成孔径雷达参数和常见的差异植被指数(DVI),我们对玉米、大豆和水稻的误差比使用差异植被指数(DVI)的误差提高了 50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crop yield estimation at different growing stages using a synergy of SAR and optical remote sensing data

Crop yield forecasting is an essential component of crop production assessment, impacting people at the global scale down to the level of individual farms. Until now, yield forecasting has predominantly relied on optical data, particularly the maximum value of vegetation indexes. However, this approach only presents a short forecasting window, and it is essential to obtain yield estimates as early as possible in the growing season and then further improve forecasting even after the vegetation index has reached its peak. So far, optical satellite data at high-temporal resolution (1–3 days) has been actively used for real time crop yield monitoring, whereas fewer operational models make a use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR). In this study, we explore whether SAR data can capture distinct aspects of crop dynamics, providing new insights for yield estimation depending on the crop's phenological stage. We assess the efficiency of dual- (Sentinel-1) and quad-polarimetric (UAVSAR, RADARSAT-2) data to explain inter-field crop yield variability for corn, soybean, and rice over a test area in Arkansas, US (258 fields, 2019). We used optical imagery acquired by Planet/Dove-Classic, Sentinel-2, and Landsat 8, to establish a baseline performance of satellite-based indicators to explain yield variability and assess dual- and quad-polarimetric SAR data for crop yield assessment. In terms of polarimetric indexes, the results showed that in general the results for rice were mostly stable and better than the other crops (R2adj ∼ 0.4 on average). The best results were obtained for the Sentinel-1 VHasc with R2adj = 0.47 and RADARSAT-2 phase difference with R2adj = 0.45. The results for corn performed the least with an R2adj <0.35 for all the indexes. The results for soybeans were more variable and were highly correlated with certain indicators such as RADARSAT-2 HV, RADARSAT-2 Volume, and RADARSAT-2 Pauli HV with R2adj>0.4. We also investigated the day of year (DOY) with the maximum correlation between optical and SAR-derived features and the final yields for corn, soybean, and rice. The maximum correlation for optical features occurs over a short time between DOY 155 (June 4) and 185 (July 5) for corn and rice, and DOY 190 (July 9) and DOY 211 (July 30) for soybean, with these results being consistent across various optical-based sensors. On the contrary, the maximum correlation for SAR-derived features varied significantly and was between DOY 120 (April 30) to DOY 225 (August 13). A study of the time series parameters cross-correlation showed that the optical parameters were highly correlated, but the SAR parameters showed strong temporal decorrelation. We conducted a comparison between C-band and L-band to assess their sensitivity at each stage of growth. In this experiment, we determined that for low vegetation, the C band will be more useful at the beginning of the growth cycle, while the L band provides more information in later stages of growth. Using a random forest regression model combining SAR parameters with common difference vegetation index (DVI), we improved the error by 50% in comparison to the error using the (DVI) for corn, soybean, and rice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信