乳腺癌患者每日锥形束计算机断层扫描临床靶体积的个性化深度学习模型

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Joonil Hwang MS , Jaehee Chun PhD , Seungryong Cho PhD , Joo-Ho Kim MS , Min-Seok Cho MS , Seo Hee Choi MD , Jin Sung Kim PhD
{"title":"乳腺癌患者每日锥形束计算机断层扫描临床靶体积的个性化深度学习模型","authors":"Joonil Hwang MS ,&nbsp;Jaehee Chun PhD ,&nbsp;Seungryong Cho PhD ,&nbsp;Joo-Ho Kim MS ,&nbsp;Min-Seok Cho MS ,&nbsp;Seo Hee Choi MD ,&nbsp;Jin Sung Kim PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Herein, we developed a deep learning algorithm to improve the segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) on daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in breast cancer radiation therapy. By leveraging the Intentional Deep Overfit Learning (IDOL) framework, we aimed to enhance personalized image-guided radiation therapy based on patient-specific learning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We used 240 CBCT scans from 100 breast cancer patients and employed a 2-stage training approach. The first stage involved training a novel general deep learning model (Swin UNETR, UNET, and SegResNET) on 90 patients. The second stage used intentional overfitting on the remaining 10 patients for patient-specific CBCT outputs. Quantitative evaluation was conducted using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), and independent samples <em>t</em> test with expert contours on CBCT scans from the first to 15th fractions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>IDOL integration significantly improved CTV segmentation, particularly with the Swin UNETR model (<em>P</em> values &lt; .05). Using patient-specific data, IDOL enhanced the DSC, HD, and MSD metrics. The average DSC for the 15th fraction improved from 0.9611 to 0.9819, the average HD decreased from 4.0118 mm to 1.3935 mm, and the average MSD decreased from 0.8723 to 0.4603. Incorporating CBCT scans from the initial treatments and first to third fractions further improved results, with an average DSC of 0.9850, an average HD of 1.2707 mm, and an average MSD of 0.4076 for the 15th fraction, closely aligning with physician-drawn contours.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Compared with a general model, our patient-specific deep learning-based training algorithm significantly improved CTV segmentation accuracy of CBCT scans in patients with breast cancer. This approach, coupled with continuous deep learning training using daily CBCT scans, demonstrated enhanced CTV delineation accuracy and efficiency. Future studies should explore the adaptability of the IDOL framework to diverse deep learning models, data sets, and cancer sites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 101580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400143X/pdfft?md5=fa284c9d2a447b04df74792bf283ebdb&pid=1-s2.0-S245210942400143X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized Deep Learning Model for Clinical Target Volume on Daily Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"Joonil Hwang MS ,&nbsp;Jaehee Chun PhD ,&nbsp;Seungryong Cho PhD ,&nbsp;Joo-Ho Kim MS ,&nbsp;Min-Seok Cho MS ,&nbsp;Seo Hee Choi MD ,&nbsp;Jin Sung Kim PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Herein, we developed a deep learning algorithm to improve the segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) on daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in breast cancer radiation therapy. By leveraging the Intentional Deep Overfit Learning (IDOL) framework, we aimed to enhance personalized image-guided radiation therapy based on patient-specific learning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We used 240 CBCT scans from 100 breast cancer patients and employed a 2-stage training approach. The first stage involved training a novel general deep learning model (Swin UNETR, UNET, and SegResNET) on 90 patients. The second stage used intentional overfitting on the remaining 10 patients for patient-specific CBCT outputs. Quantitative evaluation was conducted using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), and independent samples <em>t</em> test with expert contours on CBCT scans from the first to 15th fractions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>IDOL integration significantly improved CTV segmentation, particularly with the Swin UNETR model (<em>P</em> values &lt; .05). Using patient-specific data, IDOL enhanced the DSC, HD, and MSD metrics. The average DSC for the 15th fraction improved from 0.9611 to 0.9819, the average HD decreased from 4.0118 mm to 1.3935 mm, and the average MSD decreased from 0.8723 to 0.4603. Incorporating CBCT scans from the initial treatments and first to third fractions further improved results, with an average DSC of 0.9850, an average HD of 1.2707 mm, and an average MSD of 0.4076 for the 15th fraction, closely aligning with physician-drawn contours.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Compared with a general model, our patient-specific deep learning-based training algorithm significantly improved CTV segmentation accuracy of CBCT scans in patients with breast cancer. This approach, coupled with continuous deep learning training using daily CBCT scans, demonstrated enhanced CTV delineation accuracy and efficiency. Future studies should explore the adaptability of the IDOL framework to diverse deep learning models, data sets, and cancer sites.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400143X/pdfft?md5=fa284c9d2a447b04df74792bf283ebdb&pid=1-s2.0-S245210942400143X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400143X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400143X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们开发了一种深度学习算法,用于改进乳腺癌放射治疗中每日锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描的临床靶体积(CTV)分割。通过利用有意深度过拟合学习(IDOL)框架,我们旨在根据患者的具体学习情况,提高个性化图像引导放疗的效果。方法与材料我们使用了来自 100 名乳腺癌患者的 240 张 CBCT 扫描图像,并采用了两阶段训练方法。第一阶段是在 90 名患者身上训练新型通用深度学习模型(Swin UNETR、UNET 和 SegResNET)。第二阶段对剩余的 10 名患者进行有意的过度拟合,以获得患者特定的 CBCT 输出结果。使用骰子相似系数 (DSC)、豪斯多夫距离 (HD)、平均表面距离 (MSD) 和独立样本 t 检验对 CBCT 扫描的第一至第十五分段的专家轮廓进行了定量评估。利用患者的特定数据,IDOL 增强了 DSC、HD 和 MSD 指标。第 15 部分的平均 DSC 从 0.9611 提高到 0.9819,平均 HD 从 4.0118 mm 下降到 1.3935 mm,平均 MSD 从 0.8723 下降到 0.4603。与一般模型相比,我们基于特定患者深度学习的训练算法显著提高了乳腺癌患者 CBCT 扫描的 CTV 分割准确性。这种方法与使用每日 CBCT 扫描进行的持续深度学习训练相结合,提高了 CTV 划分的准确性和效率。未来的研究应探索 IDOL 框架对不同深度学习模型、数据集和癌症部位的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalized Deep Learning Model for Clinical Target Volume on Daily Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

Herein, we developed a deep learning algorithm to improve the segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) on daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in breast cancer radiation therapy. By leveraging the Intentional Deep Overfit Learning (IDOL) framework, we aimed to enhance personalized image-guided radiation therapy based on patient-specific learning.

Methods and Materials

We used 240 CBCT scans from 100 breast cancer patients and employed a 2-stage training approach. The first stage involved training a novel general deep learning model (Swin UNETR, UNET, and SegResNET) on 90 patients. The second stage used intentional overfitting on the remaining 10 patients for patient-specific CBCT outputs. Quantitative evaluation was conducted using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), and independent samples t test with expert contours on CBCT scans from the first to 15th fractions.

Results

IDOL integration significantly improved CTV segmentation, particularly with the Swin UNETR model (P values < .05). Using patient-specific data, IDOL enhanced the DSC, HD, and MSD metrics. The average DSC for the 15th fraction improved from 0.9611 to 0.9819, the average HD decreased from 4.0118 mm to 1.3935 mm, and the average MSD decreased from 0.8723 to 0.4603. Incorporating CBCT scans from the initial treatments and first to third fractions further improved results, with an average DSC of 0.9850, an average HD of 1.2707 mm, and an average MSD of 0.4076 for the 15th fraction, closely aligning with physician-drawn contours.

Conclusion

Compared with a general model, our patient-specific deep learning-based training algorithm significantly improved CTV segmentation accuracy of CBCT scans in patients with breast cancer. This approach, coupled with continuous deep learning training using daily CBCT scans, demonstrated enhanced CTV delineation accuracy and efficiency. Future studies should explore the adaptability of the IDOL framework to diverse deep learning models, data sets, and cancer sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信